Contextualizing technology and communication in a corporate setting

Nonacademic Writing: Social Theory and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 305-324

  Hansen, Craig J ^a  

^a METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85096268663     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Blyler, N. R., & Thralls, C. (1992). Professional communication: The social perspective.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Brady, L. (1993). A contextual theory for business writing. Journal of Business Communication, 7(4), 452-471
3. Cross, G. (1990). A Bahktian exploration of factors affecting the collaborative writing of an executive letter of an annual report. Research in the Teaching of English, 24(2), 173-202.
4. Doheny-Farina, S. (1991). Creating a text/creating a company: The role of a text in the rise and decline of a new organization. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 306-335). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Duin, A. H., & Hansen, C. J.. (1994). Computer networks as social construction and social interaction: An overview. In C. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Computers and literacy (pp. 89-112). New York: Modern Language Association.
6. Cintron, R. (1993). Wearing a pith helmet at a sly angle: Or, can writing researchers do ethnography in a postmodern era? Written Communication, 10(3), 371-412.
7. Elmore, G. (1991). Planning and developing a multimedia learning environment. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 19(7), 83-90.
8. Hansen, C. J. (1992). Communication technologies in corporate settings. Bulletin of the Association ofBusiness Communication, 60(4), 3-9.
9. Hansen, C. J. (1995). Writing the project team: Authority and intertextuality in a corporate setting. Journal of Business Communication, 32(2), 103-123.
10. Herndl, C. (1991). Writing ethnography: Representation, rhetoric, and institutional practices. College English, 53(3), 320-332.
11. Horn, W. D. (1993). Network collaboration with UNIX. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(4), 413-429.
12. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response. Written Communication, 8(4), 509-532.
13. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Rice, R., & Danowski, J. (1993). Is it really just like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voice mail users. Journal of Business Communication, 30(4), 369-399.
15. Slatin, J. (1990). Reading hypertext: Order and coherence in a new medium. College English, 52(8), 870-883.
16. Spilka, R. (1990). Orality and literacy in the workplace: Process and text-based strategies for multiple-audience adaptation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4(1), 44-67.
17. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Stygall, G. (1991). Texts in oral contexts: The “transmission” of jury instructions in an Indiana trial. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 234-255). Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
19. Thralls, C. (1992). Rites and ceremonials: Corporate video and construction of social realities in modern organizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(4), 381-402.
20. Winsor, D. (1989). An engineer’s writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6(3), 270-285.
21. Witte, S. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9(2), 237-308.