IHS-GTF: A fusion method for optical and synthetic aperture radar data

Remote Sensing

Volumn 12, Issue 17, 2020, Pages 1-20

  Shao, Zhenfeng ^a   Wu, Wenfu ^a   Guo, Songjing ^b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF GEOSCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Image fusion; Impervious surface; Optical and SAR; Pixel saliency

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; IMAGE FUSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; OVERALL ACCURACIES; RADIATION INFORMATION; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER; SPECTRAL DISTORTIONS; SPECTRAL INFORMATION;

RADAR IMAGING;

EID: 85095118988     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs12172796     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Shao, Z.; Zhou, W.; Deng, X.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, Q. Multilabel Remote Sensing Image Retrieval Based on Fully Convolutional Network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2020, 13, 318–328. [CrossRef]
2. Dekker, R.J. Texture Analysis and Classification of ERS SAR Images for Map Updating of Urban Areas in The Netherlands. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41, 1950–1958. [CrossRef]
3. Shao, Z.; Tang, P.; Wang, Z.; Saleem, N.; Yam, S.; Sommai, C. BRRNet: A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Building Extraction From High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1050. [CrossRef]
4. Samadhan, C.K.; Priti, P.R. Pixel Level Fusion Techniques for SAR and Optical Images: A Review. Inf. Fusion 2020, 59, 13–19.
5. Pohl, C.; Van Genderen, J. Multisensor Image Fusion in Remote Sensing: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 823–854. [CrossRef]
6. Shao, Z.; Pan, Y.; Diao, C.; Cai, J. Cloud Detection in Remote Sensing Images Based on Multiscale Features-Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2019, 57, 4062–4076. [CrossRef]
7. Zhenfeng, S.; Juan, D.; Lei, W.; Yewen, F.; Neema, S.; Qimin, C. Fuzzy AutoEncode Based Cloud Detection for Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 311.
8. Calabresi, G. The Use of ERS SAR for Flood Monitoring: AN Overall Assessment. In Proceedings of the Second ERS Application Workshop, London, UK, 6–8 December 1995; pp. 237–241.
9. Floyd, M.H.; Xia, Z.G. SAR applications in human settlement detection, population estimation and urban land use pattern analysis: A status report. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1997, 35, 79–85.
10. Joshi, N.; Baumann, M.; Ehammer, A.; Reiche, J. A review of the application of optical and radar remote sensing data fusion to land use mapping and monitoring. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 70. [CrossRef]
11. Gamba, P.; Dell’Acqua, F. Fusion of radar and optical data for identification of human settlements. In Remote Sensing Impervious Surface; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 143–159.
12. Guo, Q.; Li, A.; Zhang, H.Q.; Feng, Z.K. Remote Sensing Image Fusion Based on Discrete Fractional Random Transform for Modified IHS. Pet. Chem. 2013, XL-7/W1, 19–22. [CrossRef]
13. Pal, S.K.; Majumdar, T.J.; Bhattacharya, A.K. ERS-2 SAR and IRS-1C LISS III data fusion: A PCA approach to improve remote sensing based geological interpretation. Isprs J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2007, 61, 281–297. [CrossRef]
14. Abd, M.S.; Norwati, M.; Nasir, S.M.; Azura, H.N.; Abdul, H.M.R. Comparison of Classification Techniques on Fused Optical and SAR Images for Shoreline Extraction: A Case Study at Northeast Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. J. Comput. Sci. 2016, 12, 399–411.
15. Dupas, C. SAR and LANDSAT TM image fusion for land cover classification in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Domain. Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. 2000, 33, 96–103.
16. Chandrakanth, R.; Saibaba, J.; Varadan, G.; Raj, P.A. Feasibility of high resolution SAR and multispectral data fusion. In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24–29 July 2011.
17. Do, M.N.; Member; Ieee; Fellow; Ieee. The Contourlet Transform: An Efficient Directional Multiresolution Image Representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. A Publ. IEEE Signal Process. Soc. 2006, 14, 2091–2106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Wu, W.; Guo, S.; Cheng, Q. Fusing optical and synthetic aperture radar images based on shearlet transform to improve urban impervious surface extraction. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2020, 14, 1. [CrossRef]
19. Chen, S.; Zhang, R.; Su, H.; Tian, J.; Xia, J. SAR and Multispectral Image Fusion Using Generalized IHS Transform Based on à Trous Wavelet and EMD Decompositions. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 737–745. [CrossRef]
20. Byun, Y.; Choi, J.; Han, Y. An Area-Based Image Fusion Scheme for the Integration of SAR and Optical Satellite Imagery. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2013, 6, 2212–2220. [CrossRef]
21. Zhang, W.; Yu, L. SAR and Landsat ETM+ image fusion using variational model. In Proceedings of the 2010–2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering, Chengdu, China, 12–13 June 2010. [CrossRef]
22. Yin, Z. Fusion algorithm of optical images and SAR with SVT and sparse representation. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 2015, 8, 1123–1141. [CrossRef]
23. Wen, X.; Li, C. Feature Level Image Fusion for SAR and Optical Images. In Proceedings of the IET International Conference on Information Science & Control Engineering, Shenzhen, China, 18 January 2012.
24. Ma, J.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Huang, J. Infrared and visible image fusion via gradient transfer and total variation minimization. Inf. Fusion 2016, 31, 100–109. [CrossRef]
25. Xu, R.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H. Urban Impervious Surfaces Estimation From Optical and SAR Imagery: A Comprehensive Comparison. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2017, 10, 4010–4021. [CrossRef]
26. Lin, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H.; Gamba, P.E.; Liu, X. Incorporating synthetic aperture radar and optical images to investigate the annual dynamics of anthropogenic impervious surface at large scale. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 242, 111757. [CrossRef]
27. Shao, Z.; Fu, H.; Fu, P.; Yin, L. Mapping urban impervious surface by fusing optical and SAR data at the decision level. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 945. [CrossRef]
28. Xu, H. Analysis of impervious surface and its impact on Urban heat environment using the normalized difference impervious surface index (NDISI). Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2010, 76, 557–565. [CrossRef]
29. Yang, J.; Sun, J.; Ge, Q.; Li, X. Assessing the impacts of urbanization-associated green space on urban land surface temperature: A case study of Dalian, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 22, 1–10. [CrossRef]
30. Weng, Q.; Lu, D.; Schubring, J. Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 89, 467–483. [CrossRef]
31. Wang, J.; Zhan, Q.M.; Guo, H.G.; Jin, Z.C. Characterizing the spatial dynamics of land surface temperature-impervious surface fraction relationship. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2016, 45, 55–65. [CrossRef]
32. Shao, Z.; Fu, H.; Li, D.; Altan, O.; Cheng, T. Remote sensing monitoring of multi-scale watersheds impermeability for urban hydrological evaluation. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 232, 111338. [CrossRef]
33. Yu, H.F.; Zhao, Y.L.; Fu, Y.C. Optimization of Impervious Surface Space Layout for Prevention of Urban Rainstorm Waterlogging: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019, 16, 3613. [CrossRef]
34. Yu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Li, L. Spatiotemporal variance assessment of urban rainstorm waterlogging affected by impervious surface expansion: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3761. [CrossRef]
35. Shao, Z.; Li, C.; Li, D.; Altan, O.; Zhang, L.; Ding, L. An Accurate Matching Method for Projecting Vector Data into Surveillance Video to Monitor and Protect Cultivated Land. Isprs Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 448. [CrossRef]
36. Carper, W.; Lillesand, T.; Kiefer, P. The use of intensity-hue-saturation transformations for merging SPOT panchromatic and multispectral image data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1990, 56, 459–467.
37. Chan, T.F.; Esedoglu, S. Aspects of total variation regularized L1 function approximation. Siam J. Appl. Math. 2005, 65, 1817–1837. [CrossRef]
38. Li, S.; Kang, X.; Hu, J. Image Fusion With Guided Filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013, 22, 2864–2875. [PubMed]
39. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H. Improving the impervious surface estimation with combined use of optical and SAR remote sensing images. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 141, 155–167. [CrossRef]
40. Breiman, L.; Breiman, L.; Cutler, R.A. Random Forests Machine Learning. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 2, 199–228.
41. Zhang, H.; Xu, R. Exploring the optimal integration levels between SAR and optical data for better urban land cover mapping in the Pearl River Delta. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf. 2018, 64, 87–95. [CrossRef]
42. Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Lin, H.; Zheng, Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, Y. A manifold learning approach to urban land cover classification with optical and radar data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 172, 11–24. [CrossRef]