An empirical study of method inlining for a Java just-in-time compiler

Proceedings of the 2nd Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium, JAVA VM 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Suganuma, Toshio ^a   Yasue, Toshiaki ^a   Nakatani, Toshio ^a  

^a IBM RESEARCH TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; HEURISTIC METHODS; NETWORK SECURITY; OPTIMIZATION; VIRTUAL MACHINE;

AUTOMATIC OPTIMIZATION; DIRECTED METHODS; DYNAMIC COMPILATION; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INSTRUMENTATION CODE; JUST IN TIME COMPILERS; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; SITE DISTRIBUTION;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE;

EID: 85093111577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, and P.F. Sweeney. Adaptive Optimizations in the Jalapeño JVM. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, pp. 47-65, Oct. 2000.
2. M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, and P.F. Sweeney. Adaptive Optimizations in the Jalapeño JVM: The Controller's Analytical Model. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, FDDO-3, Dec. 2000.
3. M. Arnold. Online Instrumentation and Feedback-Directed Optimization of Java. Technical Report DCS-TR-469, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, Nov. 2001.
4. M. Arnold, S. Fink, V. Sarkar, and P.F. Sweeney. A Comparative Study of Static and Profile-Based Heuristics for Inlining. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Dynamic and Adaptive Compilation and Optimization, Jan. 2000.
5. A. Ayers, R. Gottlieb, and R. Schooler. Aggressive Inlining. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 134-145, Jun. 1997.
6. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia. Dynamo: A Transparent Dynamic Optimization System. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 1-12, Jun. 2000.
7. P.P. Chang, S.A. Mahlke, W.Y. Chen, and W.W. Hwu. Profile-Guided Automatic Inline Expansion for C Programs. Software Practice and Experience 22(5), pp. 349-369, May 1992.
8. W.Y. Chen, P.P. Chang, T.M. Conte, and W.W. Hwu. The Effect of Code Expanding Optimizations on Instruction Cache Design. IEEE Transactions on Computer 42(9), pp. 1045-1057, Sep. 1993.
9. M. Cierniak, G.Y. Lueh, and J.M. Stichnoth. Practicing JUDO: Java Under Dynamic Optimizations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 13-26, Jun. 2000.
10. J. Dean, and C. Chambers. Training Compilers for Better Inlining Decisions. Technical Report 93-05-05, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, May 1993.
11. D. Detlefs, and O. Agesen. Inlining of Virtual Methods. In The 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, ECOOP, Lecture Note in Computer Science, 1628, pp. 258-277, 1999.
12. D. Grove, J. Dean, C. Garrett, and C. Chambers. Profile-Guided Receiver Class Prediction. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, pp. 108-123, Oct. 1995.
13. R.E. Hank, W.W. Hwu, and B.R. Rau. Region-Based Compilation: An Introduction and Motivation. In Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Microarchitecture, pp. 158-168, Dec. 1995.
14. U. Hölzle. Adaptive Optimization for SELF: Reconciling High Performance with Exploratory Programming. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, CS-TR-94-1520, Aug. 1994.
15. K. Ishizaki, M. Kawahito, T. Yasue, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. A Study of Devirtualization Techniques for a Java Just-In-Time Compiler. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, pp. 294-310, Oct. 2000.
16. O. Kaser, and C.R. Ramakrishman. Evaluating Inlining Techniques. Computer Languages, 24(2) pp. 55-72, 1998.
17. C. Krintz, and B. Calder. Using Annotations to Reduce Dynamic Optimization Time. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 156-167, Jun. 2001.
18. M. Mock, C. Chambers, and S. Eggers. Calpa: A Tool for Automating Selective Dynamic Compilation. In Proceedings of 33rd International Conference on Microarchitecture, pp. 1-12, Dec. 2000.
19. T. Ogasawara, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. A Study of Exceptions and its Dynamic Optimization for Java. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, pp. 83-95, Oct. 2001.
20. M. Paleczny, C. Vick, and C. Click. The Java HotSpot Server Compiler. In Proceedings of the Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium (JVM'01), pp. 1-12, Apr. 2001.
21. R.W. Schiefler. An Analysis of Inline Substitution for a Structured Programming Language. Communications of the ACM, 20(9), pp. 647-654, Sep. 1977.
22. Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. SPECjvm98 and SPECjbb2000 benchmarks available at http://www.spec.org/osg.
23. T. Suganuma, T. Yasue, M. Kawahito, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. A Dynamic Optimization Framework for a Java Just-In-Time Compiler. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, pp. 180-194, Oct. 2001.
24. J. Whaley. A Portable Sampling-Based Profiler for Java Virtual Machines. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Java Grande Conference, pp. 78-87, Jun. 2000.