Hierarchical file systems are dead

Proceedings of HotOS 2009 - 12th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Seltzer, Margo ^a   Murphy, Nicholas ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILE ORGANIZATION;

DESIGN FILES; FILE SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; NAMESPACES; SEARCH CAPABILITIES; SEARCH-BASED;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 85092634409     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Jfs. http://oss.software.ibm.com/jfs.
2. Veritas sanpoint direct file access.
3. Layering in provenance systems. In Proceedings of the 2009 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (San Diego, CA, June 2009), USENIX Association.
4. The beagle project. http://beagle-project.org/Main Page.
5. CHISNALL, D. Zfs uncovered. http://www.informit. com/articles/article.aspx?p=712746, April 2007.
6. GALLI, R. Journal file systems in linux. 50-56.
7. Hfs plus volume format. http://developer.apple. com/technotes/tn/tn1150.html.
8. The design and implementation of the inversion file system. In Proceedings of the 1993 USENIX Winter Conference (1993), pp. 205-218.
9. KNUTH, D. The Art of Computer Programming Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
10. Lucene. http://lucene.apache.org/.
11. MACCORMACK, A., RUSNAK, J., AND BALDWIN, C. Y. The impact of component modularization on design evolution: Evidence from the software industry.
12. MACDONALD, J. Reiser4 transaction design document. http: //lwn.net/2001/1108/a/reiser4-transaction. php3.
13. MCKUSICK, M. K., JOY, W. N., LEFFLER, S. J., AND FABRY, R. S. A fast file system for unix. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 2 (1984), 181-197.
14. NAGLE, D., FACTOR, M. E., IREN, S., NAOR, D., RIEDEL, E., RODEH, O., AND SATRAN, J. The ansi t10 object-based storage standard and current implementation. IBM Journal of Research and Development 52, 4 (July 2008), 401-411.
15. OLSON, J. Enhance your apps with file system transactions. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163388.aspx.
16. OLSON, M. A., BOSTIC, K., AND SELTZER, M. I. Berkeley DB. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, FREENIX Track (Monterey, CA, June 1999).
17. SCHMUCK, F., AND WYLIE, J. Experience with transactions in quicksilver. ACM SIGOPS Operating System Review 25, 5 (October 1991), 239-253.
18. SELTZER, M., AND STONEBRAKER, M. Transaction support in read optimized and write optimized file systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (1990), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 174-185.
19. Semantic file systems. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (October 1991), pp. 16-25.
20. SOLARIS. Zfs source tour. http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/#DMU.
21. Working with spotlight. http://developer.apple.com/macosx/spotlight.html.
22. STEIN, L. Stupid file systems are better. In HOTOS'05: Proceedings of the 10th conference on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005), USENIX Association, pp. 5-5.
23. STONEBRAKER, M. Operating system support for database management. Commun. ACM 24, 7 (1981), 412-418.
24. STONEBRAKER, M., AND CETINTEMEL, U. "one size fits all": An idea whose time has come and gone". In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (Tokyo, Japan, April 2005), IEEE Computer Society Press.
25. SWEENEY, A., SWEENEY, A., DOUCETTE, D., HU, W., ANDERSON, C., NISHIMOTO, M., AND PECK, G. Scalability in the xfs file system. In In Proceedings of the 1996 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (1996), pp. 1-14.
26. Windows search. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/desktopsearch/default.mspx.
27. The xapian project. http://www.xapian.org/.