The TIPSTER SUMMAC text summarization evaluation

9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 77-85

  Mani, Inderjeet ^a   House, David ^a   Klein, Gary ^a   Hirschman, Lynette ^a   Firmin, Therese ^b   Sundheim, Beth ^c  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c Naval Command   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEXT PROCESSING;

ASSESSMENT TASKS; AUTOMATED EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC TEXT SUMMARIZATION; DECISIONS MAKINGS; F-SCORE; INTRINSIC METHODS; RELEVANCE ASSESSMENTS; SPEED UP; TEXT LENGTH; TEXT SUMMARISATION;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85089921824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Brandow, R., K. Mitze, and L. Rau. 1994. Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. Information Processing and Management, 31(5).
2. Carletta, J., A. Isard, S. Isard, J. C. Jowtko, G. Doherty-Sneddon, and A. H. Anderson. 1997. The Reliability of a Dialogue Structure Coding Scheme. Computational Linguistics, 23, 1, 13-32.
3. Edmundson, H.P. 1969. New methods in automatic abstracting. The Association for Computing Machinery, 16(2).
4. Harman, D.K. and E.M. Voorhees. 1996. The fifth text retrieval conference (trec-5). National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST SP 500-238.
5. Jing, H., R. Barzilay, K. McKeown, and M. Elhadad. 1998. Summarization evaluation methods: Experiments and analysis, in Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization, Spring 1998, Technical Report, AAAI, 1998.
6. Kupiec, J. Pedersen, and F. Chen. 1995. A trainable document summarizer. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGIR Conference (SIGIR'95).
7. Mani, I. and E. Bloedorn. 1997. Multi-document Summarization by Graph Search and Merging. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97), Providence, RI, July 27-31, 1997, 622-628.
8. Maybury, M. 1995. Generating Summaries from Event Data. Information Processing and Management, 31,5, 735-751.
9. Minel, J-L., S. Nugier, and G. Piat. 1997. How to appreciate the quality of automatic text summarization. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M., eds., Proceedings of the ACL/EACL'97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization.
10. Morris, A., G. Kasper, and D. Adams. 1992. The Effects and Limitations of Automatic Text Condensing on Reading Comprehension Performance. Information Systems Research, 3(1).
11. Paice, C. 1990. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects. Information Processing and Management, 26(1).
12. Rath, G.J., A. Resnick, and T.R. Savage. 1961. The formation of abstracts by the selection of sentences. American Documentation, 12(2).
13. Salton, G., A. Singhal, M. Mitra, and C. Buckley. 1997. Automatic Text Structuring and Summarization. Information Processing and Management, 33(2).
14. Sparck-Jones, K. 1998. Summarizing: Where are we now? where should we go? Mani, I. and Maybury, M., eds., Proceedings of the ACL/EACL'97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization.
15. Tombros, A., and M. Sanderson. 1998. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval, in Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGIR Conference (SIGIR'98), 2-10.
16. Voorhees, Ellen M. 1998. Variations in Relevance Judgments and the Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-98), Melbourne, Australia. 315-323.