Speech prosody as articulated communicative functions

Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Xu, Yi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISM; COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS; ENCODINGS; PROSODICS; SPEECH PROSODY;

SPEECH;

EID: 85089834653     PISSN: 23332042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Chen, Y.; Xu, Y., in press. Production of weak elements in speech-Evidence from f0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. To appear in Phonetica.
2. Cho, T., 2004. Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. J. Phonetics 32, 141-176.
3. Fougeron, C.; Keating, P. A., 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3728-3740.
4. Fujisaki, H., this session. The roles of physiology, physics and mathematics in modeling prosodic features of speech.
5. Hirst, D. J. 2005. Form and function in the representation of speech prosody. Speech Communication 46, 334-347.
6. Jakobson, R.; Fant, G.; Halle, M., 1963. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
7. Kochanski, G.; Shih, C., 2003. Prosody modeling with soft templates. Speech Commun. 39, 311-352.
8. Kohler, K. J., 2004. Prosody Revisited-FUNCTION, TIME, and the LISTENER in Intonational Phonology. Proc. Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 171-174.
9. Kohler, K. J., this session. What is emphasis and how is it coded?
10. Liu, F.; Xu, Y., 2005. Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation. Phonetica 62, 70-87.
11. Mixdorff, H., 2004. Quantitative tone and intonation modeling across languages. Proc. International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing, 137-142.
12. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph. D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
13. Pierrehumbert, J.; Hirschberg, J., 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication. P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack. (eds.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 271-311.
14. Pierrehumbert, J., 2000. Tonal elements and their alignment. In Prosody: Theory and Experiment-Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce. M. Horne. (eds.) London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 11-36.
15. Prom-on, S.; Xu, Y.; Bundit T., this volume. Functionaloriented articulatory modeling of tones and intonations.
16. Rump, H. H.; Collier, R., 1996. Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Lang. Speech 39, 1-17.
17. Thorsen, N. G., 1980. A study of the perception of sentence intonation-Evidence from Danish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 1014-1030.
18. Wightman, C. W., 2002. ToBI or not ToBI. Proc. Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence, France. pp. 25-29.
19. Xu, Y., 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. J. Phonetics 27, 55-105.
20. Xu, Y., 2005. Speech Melody as Articulatorily Implemented Communicative Functions. Speech Commun. 46, 220-251.
21. Xu, Y.; Wang, Q. E., 2001. Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Commun. 33, 319-337.
22. Xu, Y.; Xu, C. X., 2005. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. J. Phonetics 33, 159-197.
23. Xu, Y.; Xu, C. X.; Sun, X., 2004. On the Temporal Domain of Focus. Proc. Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 81-84.