Do firms produce better quality research with greater academic collaboration?

Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Kumaramangalam, Kartik ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Collaboration; Research

Indexed keywords

RESEARCH;

ACADEMIC SCIENCE; BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTORS; COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; PUBLIC-PRIVATE INTERACTIONS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY; SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 85088715417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2005.18783554     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Cockburn, I., Henderson, S.S. (1998). Absorptive capacity, Co-authoring behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, June.
2. Gittelman, M., Kogut, B. (2003). Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 336.
3. Greene, W. (1981). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment. Econometrica, 49,795-798.
4. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-61.
5. Lewison, G., Cottrell, R., Lucocq, B., Dawson, G., (2003). Mapping the Landscape, National Biomedical Research Outputs, 1988-95. Wellcome Trust, Policy Report No. 9.
6. Lewison, G., Paraje, G. (2004). The classification of biomedical journals by research level. Scientometrics, Vol. 60, No 2, 145-157.
7. Murray, F. (2002): Innovation as Co-evolution of Scientific and Technological Networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, Vol 31, 1389-1403.