The murder of Thomas Sandles: Meanings of a mid-nineteenth-century infanticide

Infanticide: Historical Perspectives on Child Murder and Concealment, 1550-2000

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 149-167

  Arnot, Margaret L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85088472403     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Margaret L. Arnot, 'Understanding women committing newborn child murder in Victorian England', in Shani D'Cruze (ed.), Everyday Violence in Britain, 1850-1950 (London, Longman, 2000), pp. 55-69.
2. Margaret L. Arnot, 'Infant death, child care and the state: the baby-farming scandal and the first infant life protection legislation of 1872', Continuity and Change, 9 (1994), 271-311.
3. Alfred S. Taylor, A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence (London, John Churchill, 1844), pp. 501 and 514
4. Theodoris Romeyn Beck and John B. Beck, Elements of Medical Jurisprudence, 7th edn, (London, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1842), p. 671.
5. V.A.C. Gatrell, The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People 1770-1868 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 540.
6. Carlo Ginzburg, The Cheese and The Worms (London, Routledge, 1980)
7. Carlo Ginzburg, 'Microhistory: two or three things that I know about it', Critical Inquiry, 20 (1993), 10-35
8. E. Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1980)
9. Giovanni Levi, 'On microhistory', in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991), pp. 93-113.
10. E. Muir and R. Ruggiero, Microhistory and the Lost Peoples of Europe (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).