Low-order response surface modeling of wind tunnel data over truncated inference subspaces

41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  DeLoach, Richard ^a   Erickson, G E ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC CONFIGURATIONS; ANGLE OF ATTACK; DELTA WING AIRCRAFT; NASA; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WINGS;

AERODYNAMIC RESPONSE; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; LOW-ORDER POLYNOMIALS; NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER; NON-PARAMETRIC TECHNIQUES; PIECEWISE-CONTINUOUS; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; VEHICLE CONFIGURATION;

WIND TUNNELS;

EID: 85088342488     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-456     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. DeLoach, R. "Improved Quality in Aerospace Testing Through the Modern Design of Experiments (invited). " AIAA 2000-0825. 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV. Jan 2000.
2. DeLoach, R. "The Modern Design of Experiments: A Technical and Marketing Framework (invited)" AIAA 2000-2691. 21st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference. Denver, CO. Jun 19-22, 2000.
3. DeLoach, R. "MDOE Perspectives on Wind Tunnel Testing Objectives" AIAA 2002-2796 22nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference. St. Louis, MO. Jun 24-26, 2002.
4. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Khuri, A. I and Cornell, J. A. (1996). Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
7. DeLoach, R. "Tailoring Wind Tunnel Data Volume Requirements Through the Formal Design Of Experiments" AIAA-98-2884. 20th Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Conference. Albuquerque, NM. Jun 1998.
8. Box, G. E. P., and K. B. Wilson (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 13, 1.
9. DeLoach, R. "Applications of Modern Experiment Design to Wind Tunnel Testing at NASA Langley Research Center" AIAA-0713 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, Jan 1998.
10. Kegelman, J. T. "Recent Cycle Time Reduction at Langley Research Center" AIAA 99-0178, 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, Jan 1999.
11. Hemsch, M. J. "Development and Status of Data Quality Assurance Program at NASA Langley Research Center-Toward National Standards. " AIAA 96-2214. 19th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, June 1996.
12. Hemsch, M., et al. "Langley Wind Tunnel Data Quality Assurance-Check Standard Results (Invited). " AIAA 2000-2201. 21st AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, Denver, CO. 19-22 June 2000.
13. DeLoach, R. "Tactical Defenses Against Systematic Variation in Wind Tunnel Testing" AIAA 2002-0885. 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, NV. January 14-17, 2002.
14. Fisher, R. A. (1966). The Design of Experiments, 8th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
15. DeLoach, R. "Blocking: A Defense Against Long-Period Unexplained Variance in Aerospace Ground Testing" AIAA-2003-0650 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, Jan 2003.
16. Draper, N. R., and H. Smith: Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1981.
17. Montgomery, D. C., and E. A. Peck: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1992.
18. Hocking, R. R.: Methods and Applications of Linear Models, Regression and the Analysis of Variance, Sec 10. 3. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1996.