Optimal cross–borehole tomographic geometries

1998 SEG Annual Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages

  Curtis, A ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES;

INFORMATION MEASURES; OPTIMAL GEOMETRY; RECEIVER ARRAY; SURFACE SOURCES; TOMOGRAPHIC; VELOCITY STRUCTURE; WEIGHTED VECTOR;

TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85088068262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1820602     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Barth, N., and Wunsch, C., 1990, Oceanographic experiment design by simulated annealing: J. Phys. Oceanog., 20, 1249–1263.
2. Box, G. E. P. and Lucas, H. L., 1959, Design of experiments in non–linear situations: Biometrika, 46, 77–90.
3. Curtis, A. and Snieder, R., 1997, Reconditioning inverse problems using the genetic algorithm and revised parameterization: Geophysics, 62, 5, 1524–1532.
4. John, R. C. St. and Draper, N. R., 1975, D–optimality for regression designs: A review: Technometrics, 17, 15–23.
5. Kijko, A., 1977, An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional seismic network — I: Pageoph., 115, 999–1009.
6. Maurer, H. and Boerner, D. E., 1998, Optimized and robust experimental design: A non–linear application to EM sounding: Geophys. J. Int., 132, 458–468.
7. Smith, M. L., Scales, J. A. and Fischer, T. L., 1992, Global search and genetic algorithms: The Leading Edge, January, 22–26.