Why companies rent green: CSR and the role of real estate

Academy of Management 2009 Annual Meeting: Green Management Matters, AOM 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Eichholtz, Piet ^a   Kok, Nils ^a   Quigley, John M ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Green labeling; Real estate

Indexed keywords

BANKING INDUSTRY; CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GREEN LABELING; LITERATURE REVIEWS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REAL ESTATE; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

OFFICE BUILDINGS;

EID: 85087999655     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44248224     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717-737.
2. Eichholtz, P. M. A., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. 2009. Doing Well by Doing Good: Green Office Buildings. Working Paper, Institute of Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
3. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. 2007. The Price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms of Markets. Working Paper, Sauder School of Business,Vancouver.
4. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2002. Corporate Boards and Outside Stakeholders as Determinants of Environmental Litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5): 399-415. (Pubitemid 34452921)
5. Kats, G. 2003. Green Buildings Costs and Financial Benefits. Boston: Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.
6. Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. 2000. Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3): 299-311.
7. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. 1995. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5): 120-134.
8. Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691-718.