The rise of PES in Brazil: From pilot projects to public policies

Handbook of Ecological Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 450-472

  Coudel, Emilie ^a   Ferreira, Joice ^b   Amazonas, Mauricio de Carvalho ^c   Eloy, Ludivine ^d   Hercowitz, Marcelo ^e   Mattos, Luciano ^f   May, Peter ^g   Muradian, Roldan ^h   Piketty, Marie Gabriell ^a   Toni, Fabiano ^c  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b EMBRAPA AMAZÔNIA ORIENTAL   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^d CNRS   (France)

^e Economia Ecologica e Gestao Socioambiental   (Brazil)

^f EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^g FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^h FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087739980     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783471416.00022     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Abers, R. and Keck, M., 2009. Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil's participatory water policy. Politics & Society 37(2), 289-314.
2. Andersson, K., Gibson, C. and Lehoucq, F., 2006. Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development 34(3), 576-95.
3. Assunfao, J., Gandour, C. and Rocha, R., 2012. Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: Prices or policies? Climate Policy Initiative working paper, Nucleo de Avaliafao de Politicas Climaticas, PUC-Rio de Janeiro.
4. Barbosa, V., 2012. Codigo Florestal pode 'reflorestar' area maior que Sao Paulo. Exame. Available at: http://exame.abril.com.br/meio-ambiente-e-energia/noticias/
5. codigo-florestal-pode-reflorestar-area-maior-que-sao-paulo.
6. Barreto, P. and Araujo, E., 2012. O Brasil Atingira sua Meta de Redufao do Desmatamento?, Belem: Imazon.
7. B0gelund P., 2007. Making green discourses matter in policy-making: Learning from discursive power struggles within the policy area of car taxation. Ecological Economics 63(1), 78-92.
8. Borner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Tito, M., Pereira, L. and Nascimento, N., 2010. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics 69, 1272-82.
9. Borner, J., Wunder, S., Reimer, F., Bakkegaard, R., Viana, V., Tezza, J., Pinto, T., Lima, L. and Marostica, S., 2013. Promoting Forest Stewardship in the Bolsa Floresta Programme: Local Livelihood Strategies and Preliminary Impacts. Rio de Janeiro: CIFOR, Manaus: FAS, Bonn: ZEF.
10. Brannstrom, C., 2004. Decentralising water resource management in Brazil. The European Journal of Development Research 16(1), 214-34.
11. Corbera, E., Soberanis, C. and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 68, 743-61.
12. Costa, R., 2008. Pagamento por servifos ambientais: Limites e oportunidades para o desen- volvimento sustentavel da agricultura familiar na Amazonia Brasileira. PhD Ciencia Ambiental, Universidade de Sao Paulo.
13. Dos Santos, R. and Vivan, J., 2012. Pagamentospor Servifos Ecossistemicos em Perspectiva Comparada: Recomendafoespara tomada de Decisao. Brasilia: MMA.
14. Eloy, L., Coudel, E. and Toni, F., 2013. Implementando pagamentos por servifos ambientais no Brasil: Caminhos para uma reflexao critica. Sustentabilidade em Debate 4(1), 21-42.
15. Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, 663-74.
16. Gatzweiler, F., 2006. Organizing a public ecosystem service economy for sustaining biodiversity. Ecological Economics 59(3), 296-304.
17. Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. and Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1209-18.
18. Guedes, F.B. and Seehusen, S. (eds) 2011. Pagamentos por Servifos Ambientais na Mata Atlantica: Lifoes Aprendidas e Desafios. Brasilia: MMA.
19. Guedes, F.B., Belchior, C., Tafuri, A. and Seehusen S., 2013. Lifoes Aprendidas na Conservafao e Recuperafao da Mata Atlantica: Sistematizafao de Desafios e Melhores Praticas dos Projetos-pilotos de Pagamentos por Servifos Ambientais. Brasilia: MMA.
20. Hall, A., 2008. Better RED than dead: Paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363, 1925-32.
21. Larson, A. and Ribot, J., 2009. Lessons from forestry decentralisation, in: Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds), Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, pp. 175-87.
22. Le Coq, J.F., Pesche, D., Legrand, T., Froger, G. and Saenz-Segura, F., 2012. La mise en politique des services environnementaux: La genese du Programme de paiements pour services environnementaux au Costa Rica. VertigO 12(3).
23. Lemos, M. and De Oliveira, J., 2004. Can water reform survive politics? Institutional change and river basin management in Ceara, Northeast Brazil. World Development 32(12), 2121-37.
24. Mattos, L. 2010. Decisbes sobre usos da terra e dos recursos naturais na agricultura familiar amazonica: O caso do Proambiente. PhD Instituto de Economia, Unicamp.
25. Mattos, L. and Hercowitz, M. (eds) 2011. Economia do Meio Ambiente e Servifos Ambientais: Estudo aplicado a Agricultura Familiar, as Populafoes Tradicionais e aos Povos Indigenas. Brasilia: Embrapa.
26. May, P.H., Millikan, B. and Gebara, M., 2011. The context of REDD+ in Brazil: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional paper 55. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
27. Milne, S. and Adams, B., 2012. Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community- level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Development and Change 43(1), 133-58.
28. Miteva, D., Pattanayak, S. and Ferraro, P., 2012. Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn't. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28, 69-92.
29. MMA - Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, 2011. REDD+: Documento-sintese com Subsidios de Multiplos Atorespara a Preparafao de uma Estrategia Nacional, Brasilia: MMA.
30. MMA - Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, 2012. REDD+ Relatorio de Painel Tecnico do MMA sobre Financiamento, Beneficios e Cobeneficios, Brasilia: MMA.
31. Mohammed, E., Porras, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Lima, L., Soares, A., Neto, J.T. and Viana, V. 2013. Assessing preferences for compensation packages using the discrete choice method: The case of the Bolsa Floresta program in Amazonas, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 15(4), 1-8.
32. Mosse, D. 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35(4), 639-71.
33. Moutinho, P., Stella, O., Lima, A., Christovam, M., Alencar, A., Castro, I. and Nepstad, D., 2011. REDD no Brasil: Um Enfoque Amazonico. Fundamentos, Criterios e Estruturas Institucionaispara um Regime Nacional de REDD. Brasilia: CGEE/SAE.
34. Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N. and May, P.H., 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69(1), 1202-208.
35. Nagendra, H. and Ostrom, E., 2012. Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons 6(2), 104-33.
36. Pagiola, S. and Platais, G., 2004. Payments for environmental services, Environment Strategy Notes no. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37. Pagiola, S., Carrascosa, H. and Taffarello, D. (eds) 2012. Experiencias de Pagamentos por Servifos Ambientais no Brasil. Sao Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente de Sao Paulo.
38. Pavan, M. and Cenamo, M., 2012. REDD+ nos Estados da Amazonia: Mapeamento de Iniciativas e Desafiospara Integragao com a Estrategia Brasileira. Brasilia: MMA.
39. Pesche, D., Meral, P., Hrabanski, M. and Bonin, M., 2012. Ecosystem services: Emergence of new paradigms within the economics of ecosystem, in R. Muradian and L. Rival (eds) Governing the Provision of Environmental Services. Dordrecht: Springer.
40. Phelps, J., Webb, E. and Agrawal, A., 2010. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328(5976), 312-3.
41. Sandbrook, C., Nelson, F., Adams, W. and Agrawal, A., 2010. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 44(03), 330-34.
42. Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L. and Nobre, C., 2003. Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol: A new proposal. Paper presented at COP 9, 1-12 December, Milan, Italy.
43. Santos, P., Brito, B., Maschietto, F., Osorio, G. and Monzoni, M., 2012. Marco regulatorio sobre pagamento por servifos ambientais no Brasil. Belem: Imazon.
44. Schneider, C., Coudel, E., Cammelli, F. and Sablayrolles, P. (2015). Small-scale farmers' needs to end deforestation: Insights for REDD+ in Sao Felix do Xingu (Para, Brazil). International Forestry Review 17(S1), 124-42.
45. Shi, T., 2004. Ecological economics as a policy science: Rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability. Ecological Economics 48(1), 23-36.
46. Silva, R. and Silva, J., 2006. Avaliagao Economica da Politica de Subsidio sobre a Produgao de Borracha Natural no Periodo de 1999 a 2006. Rio Branco: Universidade Federal do Acre.
47. Tejeiro, G. and Stanton, M., 2014. Sistemas Estaduais de Pagamento por Servigos Ambientais: Diagnostico, Ligoes Aprendidas e Desafios para a Futura Legislagao. Sao Paulo: Instituto o Direito por um Planeta Verde.
48. Toni, F., 2011. Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil. Forests, 2(1), 66-85.
49. Toni, F. and Kaimowitz, D., 2003. Municipios e Gestao Florestal na Amazonia. Natal: A.S. Editores.
50. Westman, W.E., 1977. How much are nature's services worth? Science 197(4307), 960-64.
51. Wunder, S., Borner, J., Rugnitz Tito, T. and Pereira, L., 2008. Pagamentos por Servigos Ambientais: Perspectivas para a Amazonia Legal. Brasilia: MMA.