An assessment of CFD prediction of drag and other longitudinal characteristics

39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Tinoco, Edward N ^a  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLE OF ATTACK; ANGLE OF ATTACK INDICATORS; COMMERCE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FORECASTING; IGNITION; LIFT; STRUTS; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT; WINGS;

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; AIRCRAFT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN DECISIONS; LONGITUDINAL FORCE; PITCHING MOMENTS; PREDICTION ACCURACY; TRANSONIC CONDITIONS; WING-BODY CONFIGURATIONS;

AERODYNAMIC DRAG;

EID: 85087595763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-1002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Rubbert, P. E and Tinoco, E. N., Impact of Computational Methods on Aircraft Design, AIAA-83-2060, August 1983.
2. Bengelink, R. L., and Rubbert, P. E., The impact of CFD on the Airplane Design Process: Today and Tomorrow, SAE Aerospace Engineering, March 1992
3. Jameson Antony, Re-Engineering the Design Process through Computation, AIAA-97-0641, January 1997.
4. Tinoco, E.N., The Changing Role of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Aircraft Development, AIAA-98-2512, June 1998.
5. Pfeiffer Neal J., The Use of CFD in the Design Process for Configuration Drag, AIAA-2000-0380, January 2000.
6. Cosner, R. R., Assessment of Vehicle Performance Predictions Using CFD, AIAA-2000-0384, January 2000.
7. Peavey, Charles C, Drag Prediction for Military Aircraft Using CFD, AIAA-2000-0383. January 2000.
8. Samant, S. S., Bussoletti, J. E., Johnson, F. T., Burkhart, R. H., Everson, B. L., Melvin, R. G., and Young, D. P., TRANAIR: A Computer Code for Transonic Analysis of Arbitrary Configurations, AIAA-87-0034, January 1987.
9. Bieterman, M.B., R. G. Melvin, F. T. Johnson, J. E. Bussoletti, D. P. Young, W. P. Huffman, C. L. Hilmes, and M. Drela, Boundary Layer Coupling in a General Configuration Full Potential Code, BCSTECH-94-032, August 1994.
10. Vatsa, V.N., Sanetrik, M.D., and Parlette, E. B., Development of a Flexible and Efficient Multigrid-Based Multiblock Flow Solver, AIAA 93-0677, 1993.
11. Yu, N. J. Su, T. Y., and Wilkinson, W. M., Multiblock Grid Generation Process of Complex Configuration Analysis Using Navier-Stokes Solvers, AIAA-96-1995, June 1996.
12. Van der Vooren, J., and Sloof, J.W., CFD-Based Drag Prediction: State-of-the-Art, Theroy, Prospects, NLR TP 90247 U, September 1992.
13. Hunt, David L., and Cummings Russell M., Determination of Drag from Three-Dimensional Viscous and In viscid Flowfield Computations, AIAA-97-2257, June 1997.
14. Van Dam, C.P., Recent Experience with Different Methods of Drag Prediction, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 35, pp 751-798, Pergamon Press, 1999.
15. ESDU data sheet 97016, ESDU International, 1997.
16. Cook, T. A., Measurements of the Boundary Layer and Wake of Two Aerofoil Sections at High Reynolds and High-Subsonic Mach Numbers, RAE Tech. Rept. TR 71127, June 1971.
17. Kroo, I.M., and Smith, S.C, Computation of Induced Drag With Nonplanar and Deformed Wakes, SAE Transactions, SAE Paper 901933, September 1990.
18. Steger, J.L., and Baldwin, B.S., Shock Waves and Drag in the Numerical Calculation of Isentropic Transonic Flow, NASA TN D-6997, October 1972.
19. Smith, Mathew F. User-Friendly CFD: Application to TRANAIR for Analysis of Transport Aircraft, SAE-985574, September 1998.
20. Purcell, Timothy W., and Om, Deepak, TRANAIR Packaging for Ease-of-Use in Wing Design, SAE-985575, September 1998.
21. Wilkinson, W. M., Lines, T. R., and Yu, N. J., Navier-Stokes Calculations For Massively Separated Flows, AIAA-96-2383, June 1996.
22. Roger, S.E., Roth, K., Cao, H.V., Nash, S.M., and Baker, M.D., Computational of a Boeing 777 Aircraft in Landing Configuration, AIAA-2000-4221, August 2000.