Deriving function-failure similarity information for failure-free rotorcraft component design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2002, Pages 121-131

  Roberts, Rory A ^a   Stone, Robert B ^a   Tumer, Irem Y ^b  

^a Architectural and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Failure analysis; Failure free component design; Function failure commonality; Functional decomposition for product design; Functional modeling

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; AIRCRAFT; PRODUCT DESIGN; ROTORS;

ROTORCRAFTS;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 85087594601     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2002/dfm-34166     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Collins, J.A., B.T. Hagan, and H.M. Bratt, The failure-experience matrix: A useful design tool. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1976. August: p. 1074-1079.
2. Mitchell, J.S., Introduction to machinery analysis and monitoring. 2nd ed. 1993: PennWell Books.
3. Carter, A.D.S., Mechanical Reliability and Design. 1997: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Smith, J.D., Gear Noise and Vibration. 1999: Marcel Dekker.
5. McAdams, D. and K.L. Wood. Quantitative measures for design by analogy, in Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2000. Baltimore, MD: ASME.
6. Tumer, I.Y. and R.B. Stone. Analytical method for mapping function to failure during high-risk component development, in Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2001. Pittsburgh, PA: ASME.
7. Stone, R.B., K.L. Wood, and R.H. Crawford. Product architecture development with quantitative functional models, in Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 1999. Las Vegas, NV: ASME.
8. Stone, R.B., K.L. Wood, and R.H. Crawford, Using quantitative functional models to develop product architectures. Design Studies, 2000. 21(3): p. 239-260.
9. Harris, F.D., E.F. Kasper, and L.E. Iseler, U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997. 2000.
10. Shafer, J., Fundamentals of Helicopter Maintenance. 1980, Basin, WY: Aviation Maintenance Publishers, Inc.
11. Huff, E.M., I.Y. Tumer, and M. Mosher. An experimental comparison of transmission vibration responses from OH58C and AH1 helicopters, in American Helicopter Society's 57th Annual Forum. 2001. Washington, D.C.
12. Arterburn, D.R., Personal Communications. 2001: NASA Ames Research Center.
13. NTSB, National Transportation Safety Board, http://www.ntsb.gov. 2001.
14. Stone, R.B. and K.L. Wood, Development of a Functional Basis for Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000. 122(December): p. 359-370.
15. Arunajadai, S.G., R.B. Stone, and I.Y. Tumer. A framework for creating a function-based design tool for failure mode identification, in Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences DETC2002/DTM34018. 2002.
16. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S. and Wood, K., 2002, "A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts," Research in Engineering Design, 13(2):65-82.
17. Little, A., D. McAdams and K. Wood. Functional Analysis: A Fundamental Empirical Study for Reverse Engineering, Benchmarking and Redesign in Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 1997. Sacramento, CA: ASME.
18. McAdams, D., R. Stone, and K. Wood. Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs. Research in Engineering Design, 1999. 11(1):p.1-19.