Should deliberative democrats defend the judicial enforcement of social rights?

Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 233-252

  Gargarella, Roberto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD TORCUATO DI TELLA   (Argentina)

^b CHR MICHELSEN INSTITUTE   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086958842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315258249-30     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bhagwati, P. (1985), ‘Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 23, pp. 561–77.
2. Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
3. Bork, R.H. (1997), The Tempting of America (New York: Free Press).
4. Cepeda, M. (2004), ‘Judicial Activism in a Violent Context’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 3, special issue, pp. 529–700.
5. Cohen, J. (1989), ‘The Economic Basis of a Deliberative Democracy’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 6(2), pp. 25–50.
6. Cooley, T. (1868), A Treatise on Constitutional Limitations (Boston: Little Brown and Co).
7. Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth).
8. Easterbrook, F.H. (1992), ‘Abstraction and Authority’, University of Chicago Law Review, 59, pp. 349–80.
9. Elster, J. (ed.) (1998), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10. Ely, J. (1980), Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
11. Fabre, C. (2000), Social Rights under the Constitution. Government and the Decent Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12. Fiss, O. (1976) ‘Groups and the Equal Protection Clause’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5, pp. 107–77.
13. Forbath, W. (1999), ‘Caste, Class and Equal Citizenship’, Michigan Law Review, 98, pp. 1–91.
14. Gloppen, S. (2006), ‘Analyzing the Role of Courts in Social Transformation’, in P. Domingo, R. Gargarella and T. Roux (eds), Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies (Aldershot: Ashgate), forthcoming.
15. Habermas, J. [1992] (1996), Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
16. Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J. (1999), The Federalist Papers, ed. C. Rossiter (New York: Mentor).
17. Held, D. (1997), Models of Democracy (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
18. Hunt, P. (1996), Reclaiming Social Rights (Sydney: Dartmouth).
19. Kramer, L. (2001), ‘Foreword: We the Court’, The Supreme Court, 2000 Term, Harvard Law Review, 115(4), pp. 16–74.
20. Manin, B. (1987), ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’, Political Theory, 15(3), pp. 338–68.
21. Michelman, F. (1987), ‘Possession vs Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property’, Iowa Law Review, 72, pp. 1319–50.
22. Michelman, F. (1998), ‘The Constitution, Social Rights and Reason’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 14, pp. 499–507.
23. Nino, C.S. (1991), The Ethics of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
24. Nino, C.S. (1996), The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
25. Sandel, M. (1996), Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
26. Scott, C. and Macklem, P. (1992), ‘Constitutional Ropes of Sand or Justiciable Guarantees? Social Rights in a New South African Constitution’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141(1), pp. 1–148.
27. Sunstein, C. (1985), ‘Interest Groups in American Public Law’, Stanford Law Review, 38, pp. 29–87.
28. Sunstein, C. (1999), One Case at a Time. Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
29. Sunstein, C. (2004), The Second Bill of Rights (New York: Basic Books).
30. Thompson, D. (1999). ‘Democratic Theory and Global Society’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(2), pp. 111–25.
31. Waldron, J. (1999), Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
32. Walzer, M. (1981), ‘Philosophy and Democracy’, Political Theory, 9, pp. 379–99.