IP-UML: A methodology for quality improvement based on information product maps and unified modeling language

Information Quality

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 115-131

  Scannapieco, Monica ^a   Pernici, Barbara ^b   Pierce, Elizabeth ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Information Quality Improvement; IP Map; Methodology; UML

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086510960     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Ballou, D.P.; Wang, R.Y.; Pazer, H.; and Tayi, G.K. 1988. "Modeling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality." Management Science 44, no. 4 (April): 462-484.
2. Batini, C., and Mecella, M. 2001. "Enabling Italian e-Government Through a Cooperative Architecture." IEEE Computer 2, no. 34: 40-46.
3. English, L. 1999. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. New York: Wiley & Sons.
4. Falorsi, P.D.; Pallara, S.; Pavone, A.; Alessandroni, A.; Massella, E.; and Scannapieco, M. 2003. "Improving the Quality of Toponymic Data in the Italian Public Administration." In Proceedings of the ICDT '03 Workshop on Data Quality in Cooperative Information Systems (DQCIS '03), ed. T. Catarci, 71-75. Rome, Italy: Università di Roma.
5. Gamma, E.; Helm, R.; Johnson, R.; and Vlissides, J. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object Oriented Software. Boston: Addison Wesley.
6. Kobryn, C. 1999. "UML 2001: A Standardization Odyssey." Communications of the ACM 42, no. 10 (October): 29-38.
7. Object Management Group (OMG). 2003. www.omg.org (August 6).
8. Pierce, E.M. 2001. "Using Control Matrices to Evaluate Information Product Maps." In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Information Quality, ed. E.M. Pierce and R. Katz-Haas, 412-423. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Redman, T.C. 1996. Data Quality for the Information Age. Boston: Artech House.
10. Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I.; and Booch, G. 1998. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Boston: Addison Wesley.
11. Shankaranarayan, G.; Wang, R.Y.; and Ziad, M. 2000. "Modeling the Manufacture of an Information Product with IP Map." In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Quality, ed. B. Klein and D. Rossin, 1-16. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. Stevens, P., and Pooley, R. 1999. Using UML: Software Engineering with Objects and Components. Boston: Addison Wesley.
13. Storey, V.C., and Wang, R.Y. 1998. "An Analysis of Quality Requirements in Database Design." In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Information Quality, ed. I. Chengular-Smith and L. Pipino, 64-87. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14. UML: Unified Modeling Language Specification. 2003. Version 1.5, OMG document formal/03-03-01. Available at: www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm.
15. Wang, R.Y. 1988. "A Product Perspective on Total Data Quality Management." Communication of the ACM 41, no. 2 (February): 58-65.
16. Wang, R.Y.; Ziad, M.; and Lee, Y.W. 2001. Data Quality. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
17. Warmer, J. B., and Kleppe, A.G. 1999. The Object Constraint Language-Precise Modeling with UML. Boston: Addison Wesley.