An initial benefits assessment of distributed air/ground traffic management concept elements

AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Forum

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Hasan, Shahab ^a   Leiden, Ken ^b   Mondoloni, Stephane ^c   Kozarsky, Daniel ^d   Green, Steven M ^d  

^a LMI   (United States)

^b Micro Analysis & Design Inc   (United States)

^c CSSI   (United States)

^d NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRPORT SECURITY; NASA;

CONFLICT DETECTION; DISTRIBUTED AIR/GROUND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTS; ECONOMIC VALUATION; HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL; NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM; TRAJECTORY MODELING; TRAJECTORY NEGOTIATION; TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION;

TRAJECTORIES;

EID: 85086494961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-6806     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Research Plan for Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management, Version 1.1, October 6, 1999.
2. Green, S., Bilimoria, K., and Ballin, M. G., Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management for En Route Flight Operations, Air Traffic Control Quarterly, Special Issue on Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management, Volume 9, Number 4, December, 2001.
3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2002), DAG-TM Concept Element 5 En Route Free Maneuvering Operational Concept Description, Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Project, NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA.
4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2003), DAG-TM Concept Element 6 En Route Trajectory Negotiation Operational Concept Description, Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Project, NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA.
5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2002), DAG-TM Concept Element 11 Terminal Arrival: Self-Spacing for Merging and in-trail Separation Operational Concept Description, Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Project, NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA.
6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2003), Single-Year, NAS-Wide Benefits Assessment of DAG-TM CEs 5, 6, and 11, Version 3.1, Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Project, NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA.
7. Hasan, S., Leiden, K., Mondoloni, S., and Pollack, J., A Methodology for Benefits Assessments of Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management, 47th Annual Air Traffic Control Association Conference Proceedings, Fall 2002, pp. 64-68.
8. Leiden, K., Kopardekar, P., and Green, S., Controller Workload Analysis Methodology to Predict Increases in Airspace Capacity, AIAA 2003-6808, November 2003.
9. Long, D., Eckhause, J., and Hasan, S., Using Enabled Throughput Instead of Reduced Delay to Quantify Capacity Improvement Benefits, AIAA 2003-6809, November 2003.
10. Mondoloni, S., Breunig, T., Green, S., and Kozarsky, D., Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management (DAG-TM) Benefit Mechanisms, AIAA 2003-6807, November 2003.
11. Federal Aviation Administration, Operational Evolution Plan, Version 5.0, available at http://www.faa.gov/programs/oep/
12. Office of Management and Budget, Circular A-94, Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs, October 1992.
13. Federal Aviation Administration, Airport Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance, Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (APO), December 1999.
14. Federal Aviation Administration, Economic Values for Evaluation of Federal Aviation Administration Investment and Regulatory Programs, FAA-APO-98-8, 1998.