How to decide whether to run one more cycle in efficient global optimization

12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Chaudhuri, Anirban ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^a   Watson, Layne T ^b  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; ITERATIVE METHODS;

EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; ENGINEERING SYSTEMS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; STOPPING CRITERIA; SURROGATE-BASED OPTIMIZATION; TRADITIONAL GOALS;

AVIATION;

EID: 85086489281     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-5668     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, and Wynn HP, "Design and analysis of computer e periments, " Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 409-435, 1989.
2. Simpson TW, Peplinski JD, Koch PN, and Allen JK, "Meta-models for computer based engineering design: survey and recommendations, " Engineering with Computers, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 129-150, 2001.
3. Jin R, Du X, and Chen W, "The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty, " Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 25 (2), pp. 99-116, 2003.
4. Quiepo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, and Tucker, PK, "Surrogate-based analysis and optimization, " Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 1-28, 2005.
5. Kleijnen JPC, Sanchez SM, Lucas TW, and Cioppa TM, "A user's guide to the brave new world of designing simulation e periments, " INFORMS Journal on Computing, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 263-289, 2005.
6. Wang GG and Shan S, Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 129 (4), pp. 370-380, 2007.
7. Simpson TW, Toropov V, Balabanov V, and Viana FAC, "Design and analysis of computer e periments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review of how far we have come-or not, " 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, Canada, September 10-12. AIAA 2008-5802, 2008.
8. Forrester AIJ and Keane AJ, "Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, " Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 45 (1-3), pp. 50-79, 2009.
9. Viana FAC, Gogu C, and Haftka RT, "Making the most out of surrogate models: tricks of the trade, " ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, August 16-18, 2010, DETC2010-28813.
10. Jones D, Schonlau M, and Welch W, "Efficient global optimization of e pensive black-bo functions, " Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 13 (4), pp. 455-492, 1998.
11. Jones DR, "A ta onomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces, " Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 21 (4), pp. 345-383, 2001.
12. Henkenjohann N, "An efficient sequential optimization approach based on the multivariate e pected improvement criterion, " Quality Engineering, Vol. 19 (4), pp. 267-280, 2007.
13. Ponweiser W, Wagner T, and Vincze M, "Clustered multiple generalized e pected improvement: a novel infill sampling criterion for surrogate models, " IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Hong Kong, 2008.
14. Ginsbourger D, Le Riche R, and Carraro L, "A multi-points criterion for deterministic parallel global optimization based on kriging, " International Conference on Nonconvex Programming, Rouen, France, 2007.
15. Ginsbourger D, Le Riche R, and Carraro L, "Kriging is well-suited to parallelize optimization, " Computational Intelligence in Expensive Optimization Problems, Vol. 2, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 131-162, 2010.
16. st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference, Orlando, USA, April 12-15, 2010, AIAA 2010-3090.
17. th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, USA, September 13-15, 2010, AIAA 2010-9392.
18. th AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialist Conference, Honolulu, USA, April 23-26, 2012 (forthcoming).
19. Zielinski K, Laur R, "Stopping Criteria for a Constrained Single-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, " Informatica, Vol. 31, pp. 51-59, 2007.
20. Schwefel Hans-Paul, Evolution and Optimum Seeking, John Wiley and Sons, 1995.
21. Schonlau M, "Computer e periments and global optimization, " Ph. D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 100-108, 1997.
22. Sasena MJ, "Fle ibility and Efficiency Enhancements for Constrained Global Design Optimization with Kriging Appro imations, " Ph. D. Thesis, University of Michigan, pp. 30, 2002.
23. Price KV, Storn RM, and Lampinen JA, Differential Evolution: A practical Approach to Global Optimization, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.
24. Schutte JF, Haftka RT, and Fregly BJ, "Improved global convergence probability using multiple independent optimizations, " International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 678-702, 2007.
25. Jones DR, Pertunen CD, Stuckman BE, "Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant, " Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 79 (1), pp 157-181, 1993.
26. Mckay MD, Beckman RJ, and Conover WJ, "A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables from a computer code, " Technometrics, Vol. 21, pp. 239-245, 1979.