Statistical analysis of CFD solutions from the drag prediction workshop

40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Hemsch, Michael J ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC CONFIGURATIONS; AVIATION; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; SUBSONIC AERODYNAMICS; WIND TUNNELS;

APPLIED AERODYNAMICS; CODE DEVELOPERS; COMPUTATIONAL TESTS; DESIGN POINTS; DRAG PREDICTION; STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF RESULTS; STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK; TECHNICAL COMMITTEES;

AERODYNAMIC DRAG;

EID: 85086489238     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-842     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Redeker, G., "DLR-F4 Wing Body Configuration", in Chapter B of A Selection of Experimental Test Cases for the Validation of CFD Codes, AGARD-AR-303 Vol. II, August 1994.
2. Redeker, G., Muller, R., Ashill, P. R., Elsenaar, A., and Schmitt, V., "Experiments on the DLR-F4 Wing Body Configuration in Several European Wind Tunnels", in Chapter 2 of Aerodynamic Data Accuracy and Quality: Requirements and Capabilities in Wind Tunnel Testing, AGARD-CP-429, July 1988.
3. Elsholz, E., "The DLR-F4 Wing/Body Configuration", in ECARP-European Computational Aerodynamics Research Project: Validation of turbulence Models, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 58, 1997, p.429-450.
4. Anon., Presentations made at the June 2001 AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop, http://www.aiaa.org/tc/apa/dragpredworkshop/ Final_Schedule_and_Results.html, Accessed November 27, 2001.
5. Rakowitz, M., Schwamborn, D., Sutcliffe, M., Eisfeld, B., Bleeke, H., and Fassbender, J., "Structured and Unstructured Computations on the DLR-F4 Wing-Body Configuration", AIAA-2002-0837, January 2002.
6. Mavriplis, Dimitri, and Levy, David W., "Transonic Drag Prediction Using an Unstructured Multigrid Solver", AIAA-2002-0838, January 2002.
7. Pirzadeh, Shahyar Z., "Assessment of Unstructured-Grid Software TetrUSS for Drag Prediction on DLR-F4 Configuration", AIAA-2002-0839, January 2002.
8. Vassberg, John, Buning, Pieter G., and Rumsey, Christopher L., "Drag Prediction for the DLR-F4 Wing/Body Using OVERFLOW and CFL-3D on an Over-set Mesh", AIAA-2002-0840, January 2002.
9. Levy, David W., "Summary of Data from the AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop", AIAA-2002-0841, January 2002.
10. Steinle, F., and Stanewsky, E., Wind Tunnel Flow Quality and Data Accuracy Requirements, AGARD-AR-184, November 1982.
11. Carter, E. C, and Pallister, K. C, "Development of Testing Techniques in a Large Transonic Wind Tunnel to Achieve a Required Drag Accuracy and Flow Standards for Modern Civil Transports", Chapter 11 in Aerodynamic Data Accuracy and Quality: Requirements and Capabilities in Wind Tunnel Testing, AGARD-CP-429, July 1988.
12. Vassberg, John, "Enhancement of AGARDAR-303 Data", http://www. aiaa. or g/tc/apa/dragpred workshop/ Final_Schedule_and_Results.html, Accessed November 27, 2001. Presented at June 2001 AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop, Anaheim CA.
13. Moffat, R. J., "Contributions to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis", Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 104, June 1982, p. 250-260.
14. Hatton, Les, "The T Experiments: Errors in Scientific Software", IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, April-June 1997, p. 27-38.
15. Hatton, Les, and Roberts, Andy, "How Accurate is Scientific Software?", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 10, October 1994, p. 785-797.
16. Knight, John G, and Leveson, Nancy G., "An Experimental Evaluation of the Assumption of Independence in Multiversion Programming", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, January 1986, p. 96-109.
17. Anon., U. S. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ANSI/NCSL Z540-2-1997, October 1997.
18. Youden, W. J., "Enduring Values", Technometrics, Vol. 14, No.1, February 1972, p. 1-11.
19. Youden, W. J., "Systematic Errors in Physical Constants", Physics Today, September 1961, p. 32-43.
20. von Mises, Richard, Probability, Statistics and Truth, Dover 1981.
21. Wheeler, Donald J., and Chambers, David S., Understanding Statistical Process Control, 2nd Ed., SPC Press, 1992.
22. Wheeler, Donald J., Advanced Topics in Statistical Process Control: The Power of Shewhart's Charts, SPC Press, 1995.
23. Croarkin, Carroll, and Tobias, Paul (Eds.), NIST/Sematech Engineering Statistics Handbook. (online) http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. Accessed September 28, 2001.
24. Mandel, John, The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data, Dover 1984.
25. Anon., Manual on Presentation of Data and Control Chart Analysis: 6th Edition, ASTM Manual Series: MNL 7, 1995.
26. Tufte, Edward R., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd Ed., Graphics Press, 2001.
27. Mosteller, Frederick, and Tukey, John W., Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics, Addison-Wesley, 1977.
28. Muller, Jorg W., "Possible Advantages of a Robust Evaluation of Comparisons", J. Res. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol. 105, No. 4, July-August 2000, p. 551-555.
29. Wheeler, Donald J., Understanding Industrial Experimentation, 2nd Ed., SPC Press, 1990.
30. Montgomery, Douglas C., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd Ed., Wiley, 1996.
31. Coleman, H. W., and Stern, F., "Uncertainties and CFD Code Validation", J. Fluids Engineering, Vol. 119, December 1997, p. 795-803.
32. Coleman, H. W., and Steele, W. G., Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, Wiley 1989.