Preparing language arts teachers in a time of reform

Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 407-416

  Grossman, Pamela L ^a   Valencia, Sheila W ^a   Hamel, Frederick L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b The University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085806665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611161-47     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Alvermann, D.E. (1990). Reading teacher education. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
2. Applebee, A.N. (1974). Tradition and reform in the teaching of English: A history, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Applebee, A. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.) The teaching of writing. 85th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. (pp. 95-113). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Applebee, A.N. (1994). Toward thoughtful curriculum: Fostering discipline-based conversation. English Journal, 83(3), 45-52.
5. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Ball, D.L., & Mosenthal, J.H. (1990). The construction of new forms of teaching: Subject matter knowledge in in-service teacher education (Report No. 90-8). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
7. Barnes, S., Barnes, D., & Clarke, S. (1984). Versions of English. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
8. Bednar, M.R. (1991, December). Teacher cognitian: Preservice knowledge and reflections about the reading process. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
9. Blanton, W.E., & Moorman, G.B. (1985). The devil’s advocate: Field experiences: Aids or impediments to classroom reading instruction. Reading Research and Instruction, 25(1), 56-59.
10. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11. Choy, S.P., Bobbitt, S.A.., Henke, R.R., Medrich, E.A., Horn, L.J., & Lieberman, J. (1994).American’s teachers: Profile of a profession. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
12. Clift, R.T. (1987). English teacher or English major: Epistemological differences in the teaching of English. English Education, 19(4), 229-236.
13. Clift, R.T. (1991). Learning to teach English—maybe: A study of knowledge development, Journal of Teacher Education, 42(5), 357-372.
14. Clift, R.T., Merg, L., & Eggerding, S. (1994). Mixed messages in learning to teach English. Teaching and Teaching Education, 10(3), 265-279.
15. Cross, D., & Paris S. (1988). Developmental and instructional analysis of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(20), 131-142.
16. Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 733-740.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Davies, K.S. (1990). Novice teachers: Do they use what we teach them? Reading Horizons, 30(2), 24-34.
19. DeFord, D. (1985). Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(3), 351-367.
20. Dewey, J. (1904/1965). The relation of theory and practice in education. In M. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary history (pp. 140-171). New York: Teachers College press.
21. Dixon, J. (1969). Growth through English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M.S., Vavrus, L.G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987), Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 347-368.
23. Durkin, D. (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4). 481-533.
24. Elbow, P. (1990). What is English? Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Evans, A.D., & Johnson, C.S. (1991, March).Theoretical orientations and content knowledge of pre-service reading teachers: A preliminary investigation into cognitive apprenticeships. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Pacific Northwest Research and Evaluation Conference, Vancouver, WA.
26. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers CollegeRecord, 87(1), 53-65.
27. Florio-Ruane, S., & Lensmire, T. (1990). Transforming future teachers’ ideas about writing instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(3), 277-289.
28. Florio-Ruane, S. (1994). The future teachers’ autobiography club. Preparing educators to support literacy learning in cutturally diverse classrooms. English Education, 26(1), 52-66.
29. Fox, D.L. (1995). From English major to English teacher: Two case studies. English Journal, 84(2), 17-25.
30. Gambell, T.J. (1991). University education students’ self-perceptions of writing. Canadian Journal of Education, 16(4), 420-433.
31. Gardner, N., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). T eaching for understanding— within and across the disciplmes. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 14-18.
32. Gere, A.R. (Ed.). (1992). Language and reflection: An integrated approach to teaching English. New York: Macmillan.
33. Gomez, M.L. (1990). Learning to teach writing; Untangling the tensions between theory and practice. (ERIC Document No. ED322 101).
34. Gomez, M.L., & Comeaux, M.A. (1990). Start with the stone—not the bole: Matching novices needs with an appropriate program of induction. (ERIC Document No. Ed 327 541).
35. Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Graff, G. (1987). Professing literature: An institutional history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Grossman, P.L. (1991). What are we talking about anyhow? Subject matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2) Subject matter knowledge. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
39. Grossman, P, L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 171-179.
40. Grossman, P.L. (1993). English as context: English in context. (Tech. Rep. #593-2). Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University. Stanford, CA.
41. Grossman, P.L., & Shulman, L. (1994). Knowing, believing, and the teaching of English. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 3-22). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
42. Guthrie, J., Seifert, M., & Mosberg, L. (1983). Research synthesis in reading: Topics, audiences, and citation rates. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(1), 16-27.
43. Hermann, B.A., & Sarracino, J. (1993). Restructuring a preservice literacy method course: Dilemmas and lessons learned. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 96-106.
44. Hiebert, E.H., & Colt, J. (1989). Patterns of literature-based reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 43(1), 14-20.
45. Hillocks, G. Jr. (1986).Research on written composition. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
46. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160-189.
47. Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow‘s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group Inc.
48. Holt-Reynolds, D., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1993, April). How do prospective teachers think about literature and the teaching of literature (Tech. Rep.). National Center for Research on Teacher Learnings, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
49. Johnston, P.H., et al. (1990). Teachers’ evaluations of teaching and learning in literacy and literature (Report Series 3-4). Albany, NY: Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature.
50. Langer, J.A., & Applebee, A.N. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education. Vol. 13 (pp. 171-194). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
51. Lanier, J.E., & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed., pp. 527-569). New York: Macmillan.
52. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. McEwan, H. (1992). Five metaphors for English. English Education, 24, 101-128.
54. Meyer, R.J. (1993, December). Preservice teachers’ literacy autobiographies and teacher development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
55. Michelson, S., Duffy, G.G., & Lasovage, J. (1984). An exploration of preservice teachers’ conceptual change during reading methods instruction, In G.H. McNinch (Ed.), Reading teacher education. Fourth yearbook of the American reading forum, (pp. 13-16). Athens, GA: American reading forum. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED290134).
56. Moore, B., & Harris, B. (1986). An assessment of preserviceteachers’ knowledge of instructional strategies for teaching phonics. (ERIC Document No. ED298 445).
57. O’Donnell, R.C. (1979). Research in the teaching of English: Some observations and questions. English Education, 10(3), 181-183.
58. Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
59. Pearson, P.D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol 2 (pp. 815-860). New York: Longman.
60. Pultorak, E.G. (1993). Facilitating reflective thought in novice teacheis. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 288-295.
61. Quisenberry, J. B, (1981). English teacher preparation: What’s happening? English Education, 13(2), 70-77.
62. Resnick, L.B., & Resnick, D.L. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. Gifford & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Future assessments: Changing views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 37-75). Boston: Kluwer.
63. Ritchie, J., & Wilson, D. (1993). Dual apprenticeships: Subverting and supporting critical teaching. English Education, 25(2), 67-83.
64. Scharer, P.L., Freeman, E.B., Lehman, B.A., & Allen, V.G. (1993). Literacy and literature in elementary classrooms: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.) Examining central issues, in literacy research, theory, and practice (pp. 359-366). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
65. Schmidt, W., & Kennedy, M. (1990). Teachers’ and teacher candidates’ beliefs about subject matter and about teaching responsibilities (Research Report). Office of Educational Research on Teacher Education.
66. Shanahan, T. (1994). Teachers thinking, teachers knowing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; National Conference on Research in English.
67. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-20.
68. Sirotnik, K.A., & Goodlad, J.I. (1988). School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns, New York: Teachers College Press.
69. Smith, J., DiSessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1993/1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
70. Sperling, M. (1994). Moments remembered, moments displayed: Narratization, metaphor and the experience of teaching. English Education, 26(3), 142-156.
71. Spiro, R.J., Carlson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., & Anderson, D.K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-Structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441) Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
72. Stansell, J.C. (1994). Reflection, resistance, and research among preservice teachers studying their literacy histories: Lessons for literacy teacher education. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.). Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice, Forty-third yearbook of the national reading conference. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
73. Tyson, H. (1994). Who will teach the children? Progress and resistance in teacher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74. Valencia, S.W., Hiebert, E.H., & Afflerbach, P.P. (1994). Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
75. Wallhausen, H.A. (1990). The effect of first teacher education courses on students’ perception of the reading process. (ERIC Document No. ED 322 490).
76. Walmsley, S.A. (1980). What elementary teachers know about writing. Language Arts, 57(7), 732-734.
77. Walmsley, S.A. (1992). Reflections on the state of elementary literature instruction. Language Arts, 69(7), 508-514.
78. Walmsley, S.A., & Walp, T.P. (1989). Teaching literature in elementary school: A report of a project on the elementary school antecedents of secondary school literature instruction (Report Series 1.3). Albany, NY: Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature.
79. Wham, M.A. (1993). The relationship between undergraduate course work and beliefs about reading instruction. Journal of Research and Development of Education, 27(1), 9-17.
80. White, B., & Smith, M.W. (1994). Metaphors in English education: Putting things in perspective, English Education, 26(3), 158-176.
81. Williams, P.L., Reese, C.M., Campbell, J.R., Mazzeo, J., & Phillips, G.W. (1994). 1994 NAEP Reading; A first look—Findings from the national assessment of educational progress. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.
82. Zarrillo, J. (1989). Teachers’ interpretations of literature-based reading. The Reading Teacher, 41(1), 22-28.