Alternative methodology for diagnostic assessment of written and verbal responses to works of art

Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 239-257

  Stavropoulos, Carol Susann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085803669     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611161-31     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Alexander, S. (1978). Marc Chagall: A biography. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
2. Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 315-344.
3. Alvermann, D.E., Smith, L.C., & Readence, J.E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(4), 420-436.
4. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Arnason, H.H. (1976). History of modern art: Painting, sculpture, architecture. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
6. Barrett, T. (1990), Criticizing photographs: An introduction to understanding images. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
7. Barrett, T. (1994a). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
8. Barrett, T. (1994b). Principles for interpreting art. Art Education, 47(5), 8-13.
9. Bolliger, H. (1957). Marc Chagall: The graphic works. London: Thames & Hudson.
10. Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
11. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1078-1089.
12. Briere, M. (1988). Art image (Vols. 1-6). Champlain, NY: Art Image.
13. Brommer, G.F. (1982). Discovering art history. Worcester, MA: Davis.
14. Carney, J.D. (1994). A historical theory of art criticism. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28(1), 13-29.
15. Chagall, B. (1973). First encounter. New York: Schocken Books.
16. Chapman, L.H. (1987). Discover art (Vols. 1-6). Worcester, MA: Davis.
17. Chapman, L.H. (1992). A world of images. Worcester, MA: Davis.
18. Clark, G.A., Day, M.D., & Greer, W.D. (1987). Discipline-based art education: Becoming students of art. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21(2), 129-196.
19. Compton, S. (1985). Chagall. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
20. Confrey, J. (1987). Misconceptions across subject matters: Science, mathematics and programming. In J.D. Novak (Ed.), Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 81-106). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Crespelle, J.P. (1970). Chagall New York: Coward-McCann, Inc.
22. dc la Croix, H., & Tansey, R.G. (1980). Gardener’s art through the ages. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
23. DeMauro, G.E. (1989). The least and most difficult content areas on the NTE speciality area test in art education. Visual Arts Research, 75(1), 48-54.
24. Dooling, D.J., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 216-222.
25. Efland, A. (1990). An approach to the assessment of art learnings. Arts and Learning Research, 8(1), 50-65.
26. Efland, A., Koroscik, J., & Parsons, M. (1991). Assessing art learning based on the novice-expert paradigms: A progress report. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Art Education Association, Atlanta.
27. Feldman, E.B. (1967). Varieties of visual experience. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
28. Feldman, E.B, (1994). Practical art criticism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Feltovich, P.J., Spiro, R.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1988). The nature of conceptual understanding in biomedicine: The deep structure of complex ideas and the development of miscanceptions, (Technical Report No. 440). Center for the Study of Reading. Urban Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
30. Fichner-Rathus, L. (1986). Understanding art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. French, M. (1992). Effectiveness of a DBAE program: Pre- and posttest SDP analysis of written statements from three elementary classrooms. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Ohio State University.
33. Getty Center for Education in the Arts (1991, March). Progress report on regional institute project on student assessment, Unpublished report, The Ohio Partnership for the Visual Arts, The Ohio State University.
34. Guba, E.G. (1978), Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation (CSE Monograph series in evaluation, No. 8). Los Angeles: University of California.
35. Hamblen, K.A. (1988). If it is to be tested, it will be taught: A rationale worthy of examination. Art Education, 4l (5), 59-62.
36. Herberholz, B., & Hanson, L. (1990). Early childhood art Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
37. Herberholz, D., & Herberholz, B. (1990). Artworks for elementary teachers: Developing artistic and perceptual awareness. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
38. Hobbs, J., & Salome, R. (1991). The visual experience. Worcester, MA: Davis.
39. Hubbard, G, (1987). Art in action (Vols. 1-8). San Diego, CA: Coronado.
40. Hubbard, G., & Rouse, M.J. (1981). Art: Meaning, method and media(Vols. 1-5). Chicago: Benefic Press.
41. Hurwitz, A., & Day, M. (1991). Children and their art. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
42. Jager, N. (Ed.). (1970). Russian art of the revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn Museum of Art.
43. Kamensky, A. (1989). Chagall: The Russian years 1907-1922. New York: Rizzoli.
44. Kirk, J., & Miller, M.L. (1990). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Koroscik, J.S. (1982). The effects of prior knowledge, presentation time, and task demands on visual arts processing. Studies in Art Education, 23(3), 13-22.
46. Koroscik, J.S. (1988). The acquisition of art knowledge: A theoretical framework for curriculum development in art education (Grant No. 8720287). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
47. Koroscik, J.S. (1990a). The function of domain-specific knowledge in understanding works of art. Inheriting the Theory: New Voices and Multiple Perspectives on DBAE. Proceeding of a national invitational seminar sponsored by the Getty Center for Education in the Arts. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Trust.
48. Koroscik, J.S. (1990b). Novice-expert differences in understanding and misunderstanding art and their implications for student assessment in art education. Arts and Learning Research, 8(1), 639.
49. Koroscik, J.S. (1992-1993). Assessing student learning in the visual arts: Application of a theoretical model. Arts and Learning Research, 10(1), 5-15.
50. Koroscik, J.S. (1993). Learning in the visual arts: Implications for preparing art teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 94(5), 9, 10, 20-25.
51. Koroscik, J.S., Osmond, A.H., & DeSouza, I. (1988). The function of verbal mediation in comprehending works of art: A comparison of three cultures. Studies in Art Education, 29(2), 91-102.
52. Koroscik, J.S., Short, G., Stavropoulos, C., & Fortin, S. (1992). Frameworks for understanding art: The function of comparative art contexts and verbal cues. Studies in Art Education, 33(3), 154-164.
53. Krathwohl, D.R. (1988). How to prepare a research proposal: Guidelines for funding and dissertations in the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Syracuse University Press.
54. Leedy, P.D. (1989). Practical research: Planning and design. New York: Macmillan.
55. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. In M.T.H, Chi, R. Glaser & M.J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Linderman, M.G. (1990). Art in the elementary school: Drawing, painting and creating for the classroom. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
57. Linn, M.C. (1985). The cognitive consequences of programming instruction in classrooms. Educational Researcher, 14(5), 14-29.
58. Makarius, M. (1988). Chagall New York: Portland House.
59. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-104). New York: Macmillan.
60. Miller, B.F., & Keane, C.B. (1972). Encyclopedia and dictionary of medicine and nursing, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
61. Mittler, G. (1994). Art in focus (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
62. Mittler, G., & Ragans, R. (1992a). Exploring art. Lake Forest, IL: Macmillan.
63. Mittler, G., & Ragans, R. (1992b). Understanding art. Lake Forest, IL: Macmillan.
64. National Teacher Examination (1987). Programs bulletin of information, 1987-88. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
65. Nickerson, R.S. (1985). Understanding understanding. American Journal of Education, 93, 201-239.
66. O’Neal, J. (1992). Wanted: Deep understandings. Update, 34(3), 1-6.
67. Parsons, M.J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Parsons, M.J. (1990). A comparison of novice-expert and developmental paradigms in terms of their use in work on the assessment of student learning in an education. Arts and Learning Research, 8(1), 30-49.
69. Parsons, M.J. (1992). Cognition as interpretation in art education. In B. Reimer & R. Smith (Eds.), 91st Yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Arts and aesthetic knowing (chap. IV). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education and University of Chicago Press.
70. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71. Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G. (1987). Transfer and teaching thinking. In D.N. Perkins, J. Lochhead & J. Bishop (Eds.), Thinking: The second conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Perkins, D.N., & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 303-326.
73. Pontbriand, C. (Ed.). (c. 1990). Festival internationale de novelle dance. Canada: Editions Parachute.
74. Prawat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 1-41.
75. Preble D., & Preble, S. (1985). Arforms. New York: Harper & Row.
76. Ragans, R. (1995). Arttalk (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
77. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 42-50.
78. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113-142.
79. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
80. Smith, R.A. (Ed.). (1989). Discipline-based art education. Origins. meaning, and development. Urbana-Champaign IL.: University of Illinois Press.
81. Stavropoulos, C.S. (1992). A diagnostic profile of art understandings based on verbal responses to works of art. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
82. Stavropoulos, C.S. (1992-1993a). Alternative methodology for assessing student learning in visual arts: The diagnostic profile of art understandings. Arts and Learning Research, 10(1), 16-32.
83. Stavropoulos, C.S. (1992-1993b). Characterizing the cognitive complexity of students’ written statements about works of art: An alternative assessment strategy. Arts and Learning Research, 10(1), 33-47.
84. Stavropoulos, C.S. (1994). Distinguishing the effectiveness of a writing intensive DBAE curriculum: A quasi-experimental study comparing three elementary classrooms’ written responses to a work of art. Arts and Learning Research, 11(1), 25-40.
85. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
86. Sweeney, J. (1946). Marc Chagall New York: Simon & Schuster.
87. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51-67.
88. Wachowiak, F., & Clements, R.D. (1993). Emphasis art: A quality art program for elementary and middle schools (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
89. West, S, (1990). Chagall. New York: Gallery Books.
90. Wilson, P.T., & Anderson, R.C. (1986). What they don’t know will hurt them: The role of prior knowledge in comprehension. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 31-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.