New urban frontiers: Periurbanization and (re)territorialization in Southeast Asia

The Design of Frontier Spaces: Control and Ambiguity

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 193-211

  Leaf, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085793109     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315615424-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Angel, S. 2012. Planet of Cities. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln institute of Land Policy.
2. Browder, J.O., James R.B., and Joseph, L.S. 1995. “Patterns of development on the metropolitan fringe: Urban fringe expansion in Bangkok, Jakarta, and Santiago.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), pp. 310-27.
3. Douglass, M. 1991. “Planning for environmental sustainability In the extended Jakarta Metropolitan Region.” in N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, and T.G. McGee (eds) 1991. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
4. Douglass, M. and Huang, L., 2007. “Globalizing the city in Southeast Asia: Utopia on the edge—the case of Phu My Hung, Saigon.” International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 3(2), pp. 1-42.
5. Fforde, A. and de Vylder, S. 1996. From Plan to Market: The Economic Transition in Vietnam. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. Friedmann, J. 2002. The Prospect of Cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Gainsborough, M. 2003. Changing Political Economy of Vietnam: The Case of Ho Chi Minh City. London/New York: Routledge Curzon.
8. Harms, E.L. 2006. Saigon’s Edge: Transforming Time and Space on Ho Chi Minh City’s Rural Urban Margin. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Department of Anthropology.
9. HCMC Statistical Office. 2008. Ho Chi Minh City Statistical Yearbook2007. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
10. Hsing, Y. 1998. Making Capitalism in China: The Taiwanese Connection. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Kelly, P.F. 1999. “Everyday urbanization: The social dynamics of development in Manila’s extended metropolitan region” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2) pp. 283-303.
12. Kim, A.M. 2008. Learning to be Capitalists: Entrepreneurs in Vietnam’s Transition Economy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Leaf, M. 1994. “Legal Authority in an Extralegal Setting: The Case of Land Rights in Jakarta, indonesia” Journal of Planning Education and Research, Fall, pp. 12-18.
14. Leaf, M. 2002. “A Tale of Two Villages: Globalization and Peri-Urban Change in China and Vietnam” Cities, 19(1), pp. 23-31.
15. Malesky, E. 2006. “Gerrymandering—Vietnamese Style: The Political Motivations behind the Creation of New Provinces in Vietnam” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, September 3, 2006.
16. McGee, T.G. 1991. “The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis” in N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, and T.G. McGee (eds) 1991. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 3-26.
17. McGee, T.G. 1995. “Metrofitting the emerging mega-urban regions of ASEAN: An overview” in T.G. McGee and i.M. Robinson (eds) 1995. The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 3-26.
18. Vandergeest, P. and Peluso N. 1995. “Territorialization and State Power in Thailand” Theory and Society, 24, pp. 385-426.
19. Waibel, M. 2004. “The development of Saigon South New Urban Area. A sign of an increasing internationalization and polarization in Vietnamese society” Pacific News, 22, pp. 10-13.
20. Waibel, M. 2006. “The Production of Urban Space in Vietnam’s Metropolis in the course of Transition: internationalization, Polarization and Newly Emerging Lifestyles in Vietnamese Society” TRIALOG—A Journal for Planning and Building in the Third World, 89(2), pp. 43-8.
21. Webster, D. 2002. “On the Edge: Shaping the Future of Peri-Urban Asia.” Discussion paper, Asia/Pacific Research Center. Stanford: Stanford University.