Comparison of approximation models with merit functions for design optimization

8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Chung, Hyoung Seog ^a   Alonso, Juan J ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; INTERPOLATION; SUPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

APPROXIMATION MODEL; AUTOMATIC MESH GENERATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; MODELING TECHNIQUE; SECOND ORDER RESPONSE SURFACES; SUPERSONIC BUSINESS JETS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYTIC;

MESH GENERATION;

EID: 85085778832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-4754     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Thomas A. Zang and Lawrence L. Green. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Techniques: Implications and Opportunities for Fluid Dynamics, 30th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, Viginia, AIAA 99-3798, June 1999
2. Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski and Raphael T. Haftka Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developments, 34th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 96-0711, January 1996.
3. th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Missouri, AIAA 98-4759, September 1998
4. Anthony A. Giunta and Layne T. Watson A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial Versus Interpolating Models, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Missouri, AIAA 98-4758, September 1998.
5. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Michell, and H. P. Wynn Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Statistical Science Vol 4. No.4, pp. 409-453, 1989
6. Timothy W. Simpson, Timothy M. Mauery, John J. Korte and Farrokh Mistree Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models in the Multidisciplinary Design of an Aerospike Nozzle, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Missouri, AIAA 98-4755, September 1998
7. Virginia Torczon and Michael W. Trosset Using Approximation to Accelerate Engineering Design Optimization, ICASE Report 98-33, Hampton, Virginia, 1998
8. Raymond H. Myers and Douglas C. Montgomery Response Surface Methodology'.Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley, New York, 1995.
9. J. R. Koehler and A. B. Owen Computer Experiments, Handbook of Statistics Vol. 13, pp. 261-308, Elsevier Science, New York, eds. S. Ghosh and C. R. Rao
10. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and E. Turkel Numerical Solutions of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods with Runge-Kutta Time Stepping Schemes, AIAA Paper 81-1259, Jan. 1981.
11. UA. Jameson Multigrid Algorithms for Compressible Flow Calculations, Lecture Note in Mathematics edited by W. Hackbusch and V. Trottenberg, Vol. 1228, Springer-Verlag, 1986.
12. Philip E. Gill, Walter Murray and Michael A. Saunders User's Guide for SNOPT 5.3: A Fortran Package for Largescale Nonlinear Programming, Technical Report SOL 98-1 Dept. of Engineering Economic Systems and Operations Research, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1998
13. James J. Reuther, Antony Jameson, and Juan J. Alonso Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers, Part I, Journal of Aircraft Vol 36, No 1, January-February, 1999
14. MATLAB User's Guide for Unix Workstations, The Math Works, Inc. Mass., August 1992, January-February, 1999
15. G. E. Box, and K. B. Wilson, On the experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 13, 1-45.
16. G. E. Box, and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley, New York, NY, 1987.