The architect as artist or scientist?: A modest proposal for the architect-As-Cultivator

Culture-Meaning-Architecture: Critical reflections on the work of Amos Rapoport

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 127-149

  Groat, Linda N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085447510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315200248-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Ahrentzen, S. and L. Groat 1992 “Rethinking Architectural Education: Patriarchal Conventions and Alternative Visions from the Perspective of Faculty Women.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 9/2: 95-111
2. Anthony, K. 1991 Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Design Studio. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold
3. Barrett, R. 1998 Liberating the Corporate Soul. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann
4. Beckley, R. 1984 “The studio is where a professional architect learns to make judgments.” Architectural Record October: 101; 105
5. Boyer, E. and L. Mitgang 1996 Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation
6. Cahoone, L. 1988 The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture, and AntiCulture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
7. Cuff, D. 1989 “Through the Looking Glass.” in R. Ellis and D. Cuff Eds. Architects' People. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
8. Cuff, D. 1991 Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
9. Fisher, T. 1994 “Can This Profession Be Saved?” Progressive Architecture 2/94: 4449; 84
10. Fuller, T. Ed. 1989 The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
11. Groat, L. 1993 “Rescuing Architecture from the Cul-de-Sac.” Journal of Architectural Education 45/3: 138-146
12. Groat, L. 1994 “Architecture's Resistance to Diversity: A Matter of Theory as Much as Practice.” Journal of Architectural Education 47/1: 3-10
13. Groat, L. and Ahrentzen, S. 1996 “Reconceptualizing Architectural Education for a More Diverse Future: Perceptions and Visions of Architectural Students.” Journal of Architectural Education 49/3: 166-183.
14. Groat, L. and S, Ahrentzen 1997 “Voices for Change in Architectural Education: Seven Facets of Transformation from the Perspective of Faculty Women.” Journal of Architectural Education 50/4: 271-285
15. Meyers, C. and T. Jones 1993 Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
16. Montgomery, S. and L. Groat 1999 “Student Learning Styles and Their Implications for Teaching.” CRLT Occasional Papers 10 Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan
17. Newman, O. 1973 Defensible Space. New York, NY: Macmillan
18. Pearson, C. 1998 “How to succeed with Expanded Services.” Architectural Record 1/98: 50-55
19. Rapoport, A. 1984 “Architectural education: There is an urgent need to reduce or eliminate the dominance of the studio.” Architectural Record October: 110; 103
20. Rapoport, A. 1995 “The Nature of Design.” Practices 3/4: 33-43
21. Reich, R. 1991 The Work of Nations. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf
22. Rochberg-Halton, E. 1986 Meaning and Modernity: Social Theory in Pragmatic Attitude. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
23. Sutton, S. 1992 “Power, Knowledge and the Art of Leadership.” Progressive Architecture 5/92: 65-68
24. Toulmin, S. 1990 Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York, NY: Free Press
25. Whyte, W. 1980 The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation
26. Wilshire, B. 1990 The Moral Collapse of the University. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press