Prediction of speech reception for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss

Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 421-431

  Rankovic, Christine M ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085435328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315789392-33     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI 53.5). (1969). American national standards methods for the calculation of the articulation index. New York: Author.
2. Byrne, D., & Dillon, H. (1986). The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear and Hearing, 7, 257-265.
3. Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Schaefer, A. B. (1989). Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 355-364.
4. Dubno, J. R., & Schaefer, A. B. (1992). Comparison of frequency-selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2100-2121.
5. Dugal, R. L., Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1980). Implications of previous research for the selection of frequency-gain characteristics. In G. A. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (Eds.), Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance (pp. 379-403). Baltimore: University Park Press.
6. Fletcher, H. (1952). The perception of sounds by deafened persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 490-497.
7. Fletcher, H. (1953). Speech and hearing in communication. New York: Krieger.
8. French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 90-119.
9. Hirsh, I. J., Reynolds, E. G., & Joseph, M. (1954). Intelligibility of different speech materials. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 530-538.
10. Kamm, C. A., Dirks, D. D., & Bell, T. S. (1985). Speech recognition and the articulation index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 281-288.
11. Ludvigsen, C. (1987). Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1162-1171.
12. McCandless, G. A., & Lyregaard, P. E. (1983). Prescription of Gain/Output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hearing Instruments, 34(1), 16-21.
13. Pavlovic, C. V. (1984). Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1253-1258.
14. Rankovic, C. M. (1989). An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
15. Rankovic, C. M. (1991). An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 391-402.
16. Rankovic, C. M., Zurek, P. M., & Freyman, R. L. (1991). Potential benefits of varying the frequency-gain characteristic for speech reception in noise for hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90 (1), 2319.
17. Skinner, M. W. (1980). Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: Effects of high-frequency compensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 306-317.
18. Zurek, P. M., & Delhome, L. A. (1987). Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1548-1559.