An international comparison of the factors affecting environmental strategy and performance

Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Darnall, Nicole ^a   Henriques, Irene ^b   Sadorsky, Perry ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Environmental strategy; Institutional theory; Resource based view of the firm

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EQUATIONS OF STATE;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS); ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; PROACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM; RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

COMMERCE;

EID: 85085399693     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2005.18783305     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Coglianese C. & Nash J. (eds.). 2001. Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
2. Cordano M. & Frieze I.H. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers. The Academy of Management Journal, 43: 627-641.
3. Ghemawat P. 1986. Sustainable advantage. Harvard Business Review, 64: 53-58.
4. Hart, S. 1995. A 'natural' resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 986-1014.
5. Henriques I. & Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381-395.
6. Hoffman A. 2000. Competitive Environmental Strategy: A Guide to the Changing Business Landscape. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
7. King A. & Lenox M. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 798-716.
8. Meyer, J.W. & Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
9. Nakamura M., Takahashi T. & Vertinsky I. 2001. Why Japanese firms choose to certify. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42: 23-52.
10. Netherwood A. 1998. Environmental management systems, in Welford, R. (ed.), Corporate Environmental Management 1, (Chapter 3). London: Earthscan.
11. Oliver C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 697-713.
12. Porter M. & van der Linde C. 1995. Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review 73: 120-38.
13. Rivera J. 2002. Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35: 333-360.
14. Sarkis J. & Kitazawa S. 2000. The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous reduction programs. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20: 225-248.
15. Sharma S. & Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729-753.