School and program evaluation

Handbook of Educational Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 926-944

  Baker, Eva L ^a   Niemi, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084881938     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203053874-39     Document Type: Chapter

References (199)

1. Aaron, H. J. (1978). Politics and the professors: The great society in perspective. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Aguirre-Mufioz, Z., Baker, E. L., Wittrock, M. C., Niemi, D., & Lee, J. J. (1994). Assessing the effects of instruction of text structure and background knowledge integration on content understanding in high school history. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
3. Alkin, M. C. (1969). Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment, 2, 2-7.
4. Alkin, M. C., Daillak, R., & White, P. (1979). Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference? (Vol. 76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Alkin, M. C., & Ellett, F. S., Jr. (1979). The importance of category systems in evaluation theory: A personal viewpoint. CEDR Quarterly, 12(3), 3-5.
6. Alkin, M. C., & House, E. R. (1992). Evaluation of programs. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.), Vol. 2, pp. 462-467. New York: Macmillan.
7. Aschbacher, P. R. (1991). Humanitas: A thematic curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 16-19.
8. Aschbacher, P. R. (1994, June). Bridging the gaps between large and small scale assessment in break-the-mold schools: The Los Angeles Learning Centers approach. Paper presented at the CCSSO National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Albuquerque, NM
9. Association of Independent Colleges and Schools. (1980). Accreditation standards: Policies, procedures, and criteria. Washington, DC: Accrediting Commission of the Association of Independent Colleges and Schools.
10. Atwood, N., & Baker, E. L. (1984). Magnet schools as voluntaiy desegregation programs: A three-year evaluation perspective (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 230). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
11. Baker, E. L. (1973). The technology of instructional development. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 245-285). Chicago: Rand McNally.
12. Baker, E. L. (1976). Evaluation of the California Early Childhood Education Program. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
13. Baker, E. L. (1994a). Learning-based assessments of history understanding [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 97-106.
14. Baker, E. L. (1994b, July). Quality school portfolio assessment. Paper presented at the AMP LEARN training session at Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.
15. Baker, E. L., Alkin, M., Russo, N., & Doby, W. (1981). Magnet schools evaluation. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unified School District.
16. Baker, E. L., & Alkin, M. C, (1973). ERIC/AVCR annual review paper: Formative evaluation of instructional development. AVCommunication Review, 21(4), 389-418.
17. Baker, E. L., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1994). The Apple classrooms of tomorrow: The UCLA evaluation studies (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 353). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
18. Baker, E. L., Niemi, D., Novak, J., & Herl, H. (1992). Hypertext as a strategy for teaching and assessing knowledge representation. In S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Drammer, & J. J. G. van Merrifinboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments (pp. 365-384). Heidelberg: Springer.
19. Baker, E. L., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (Eds.). (1994). Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Baker, E. L., & Stites, R. (1991, April). Trends in testing in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
21. Baxter, G. P., Glaser, R., & Raghavan, K. (1994). Analysis of cognitive demand in selected alternative science assessments (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 382). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
22. Bennett, R. E. (1993). On the meanings of constructed response. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Bennett, S. (1994, June). Illustrative strategies for collecting and using data on opportunity to learn from the 1993 California State Assessment in Mathematics. Paper presented at die Special Workshop on State Use of Opportunity to Learn Data, CCSSO National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Albuquerque, NM.
24. Berliner, D., Fisher, C., Filby, N., & Marliave, R. (1978). Executive summary of Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.
25. Berliner, D. C., & Tikunoff, W. J. (1976). The California Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study: Overview of the ethnographic study. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 24-30.
26. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children (the Binet-Simon scale) (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
27. Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. New York: Longman, Green.
28. Boruch, R. F. (1991). The president’s mandate: Discovering what works and what works better. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, pp. 147-167). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
29. Britton, B. (1991, April). Pushing around mental representations by revising texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30. Brooks, P. E., & Herman, J. L. (1991). LA’s BEST: An after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340 807)
31. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Mussen handbook of child psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, Cognitive development, 77-166). New York: Wiley.
32. Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed,), Culture communication and cognition (pp. 273-305). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
34. Brownell, W. A. (1964). Arithmetical abstractions: The movement toward conceptual maturity under differing systems of instruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Bums, II. (1994). Inventing technology assessments on local area networks: An estimate of the importance of motives and collaborative workplaces. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr., & E. L. Baker (Eds.), Technology assessment in software applications (pp. 235-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Burstein, L., & McDonnell, L. (1994, April). Validity of opportunity to learn measurements. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
37. Burstein, L., & Winters, L. (1994, June). Models for collecting and using data on opportunity to learn at the state level: OTL options for the CCSSO SCASS science assessment. Paper presented at the Workshop on Models for Collecting and Using Opportunity to Learn at the State Level, CCSSO National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Albuquerque, NM.
38. Campbell, D.T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409-428.
39. Campbell, D. T. (1971). Methods for the experimenting society. Paper presented at a meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, and at a meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
40. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
41. Chen, H., & Rossi, P. H. (1980). The multi-goal, theory driven approach to evaluation: A model linking basic and applied social science. Social Forces, 59, 106-122.
42. Chen, H., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7, 283-302.
43. Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organization. New York: Basic Books.
44. Cohen, D. K. (1975). The value of social experiments. In A. M. Rivlin & P. M. Timpane (Eds.), planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? (pp. 147-175). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
45. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
46. Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R., Jr. (1986). Program evaluation: The worldly science. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 193-232.
47. Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1976). Evaluation research in education. New York: Irvington.
48. Crandall, D. P, (1983, November). The teacher’s role in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 6-9.
49. Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672-683.
50. Cronbach, L.J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Cronbach, L. J. (1994, September). On the uncertainty of assessment results. Paper presented at the 1994 CRESST Conference, Getting Assessment Right! Los Angeles, CA.
52. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dombusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., & Weiner, S. S. (1981). Toward reform of program evaluation (2nd éd.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53. Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (Eds.). (1969). Research for tomorrow’s schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. National Academy of Education, Committee on Educational Research. New York: Macmillan.
54. Cuttance, P. (1994). Quality assurance in education systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 99-112.
55. Datta, L. (1975). Design of the Head Start Planned Variation experiment. In A. M. Rivlin & P. M. Timpane (Eds.), Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? (pp. 79-99). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
56. Education at a glance: OECD Indicators. (1993). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
57. Eisner, E. W. (1991). Taking a second look: Educational connoisseurship revisited. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, pp. 169-187). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
58. Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
59. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965: Improving America’s Schools Act. Public Law No. 103-227 (1994).
60. Elfin, M. (Ed.). (1994, September). America’s best graduate schools: The latest word on admissions, entrance tests and job prospects (Special issue). U.S. News & World Report.
61. Elmore, R. (1975). Design of the Follow Through experiment. In A. M. Rivlin & P. M. Timpane (Eds.), Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? (pp. 23-45). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
62. Fisher, R. A. (1951). The design of experiments (6th ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
63. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
64. Gelman, R., & Greeno, J. G. (1989). On the nature of competence: Principles for understanding in a domain. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 125-186).
65. Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 17, 519-521.
66. Glaser, R. (1965). Toward a behavioral science base for instructional design. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learning, II. Data and directions (pp. 771-809). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
67. Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., & Bransford, J. (1994). Assessing programs that invite thinking. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
70. Hemphill, J. K. (1969). The relationships between research and evaluation studies. In R. W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means (68th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II, pp. 189-220). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
71. Herman, J. L. (Ed.). (1987). CSE program evaluation kit (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72. Hively, W., Patterson, H. L., & Page, S. (1968). A universe defined system of arithmetic achievement lests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 275-290.
73. Holland, J. G. (1967). A quantitative measure for programmed instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 87-102.
74. Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior: A program for self-instruction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75. Horst, D. P., Tallmadge, G. K., & Wood, C. T. (1975). A practical guide to measuring project impact on student achievement (No. 1 in a series of monographs on evaluation in education). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
76. House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
77. House, E. R., Glass, G. V, McLean, L. D., & Walker, D. F. (1978). No simple answer: Critique of the Follow Through evaluation. In T. D. Cook, M. L. Del Rosario, K. M. Hennigan, M. M. Mark, & W. M. K. Trochim (Eds.), Evaluation studies: Review annual (Vol. 3, pp. 611-640). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
78. Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. Jaeger, R. M. (1980). On combining achievement test data through NCE scaled scores (USOE Contract No. 300-76-0095). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
80. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
81. Kerlinger, F. M., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
82. Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children’s strategies and errors: A report of the Strategies and Errors in Secondary Mathematics project. Philadelphia: NFER-Nelson.
83. Komoski, K. (1975). Instructional materials: Do they or don’t they? Learning, 3(7), 92-93.
84. Komoski, K. (1987). Beyond innovation: The systemic integration of technology into the curriculum. Educational Technology, 27(9), 21-25.
85. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
86. Leahy, P. (1991) A multi-year formative evaluation of IBM’s “Writing to Read” program. Reading Improvement, 28(4), 257-264.
87. Levin, H. M. (1983). Cost-effectiveness: A primer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
88. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89. Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
90. Linn, R. L. (1980). Evaluation of Title I via the RMC models: A critical review. In E. L. Baker & E. S. Quellmalz (Eds.), Educational testing and evaluation: Design, analysis, and policy (pp. 121-142). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
91. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1992, Winter). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Evaluation Comment, pp. 2-9.
92. Lozier, G. G., & Teeter, D. J. (1993, Summer). Six foundations of total quality management. New Directions for Institutional Research, (78), 5-11.
93. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1960). Teaching machines: An introductory overview. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book (pp. 5-22). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
94. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1965). Assessing the effectiveness of instructional programs. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning, II: Data and directions (pp. 267-320). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
95. Lumsdaine, A. A., & Bennett, C. A. (Eds.). (1975). Evaluation and experiment: Some critical issues in assessing social programs. New York: Academic Press.
96. Madaus, G. F., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). (1989). Educational evaluation: Classic works of Ralph W. Tyler. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
97. Markle, S. M. (1965). Programmed instruction in English. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book (pp. 546-583). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
98. McDonnell, L. M., Burstein, L., Ormseth, T., Catterall, J. S., & Moody, D. (1990). Discovering what schools really teach: Designing improved coursework indicators. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
99. McKnight, C. C. (1987). The underachieving curriculum. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
100. McLaughlin, M. W. (1975). Evaluation and reform: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
101. Messick, S. (1989). Validity, In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
102. Millman, J. (1974). Criterion-referenced measurement. In W. J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education (pp. 309-397). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
103. Morris, L. L. (Ed.). (1978). Program evaluation kit. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
104. Mullis, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H., & Phillips, G. W. (1991). The state of mathematics achievement: NAEP’s 1990 assessment of the nation and the trial assessment of the states (Report No. 21-ST-04, prepared by Educational Testing Service). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
105. Mumane, R. J., & Raizen, S. A. (Eds.). (1988). Improving indicators of the quality of science and mathematics education in grades K-12 (Committee on Indicators of Precollege Science and Mathematics Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
106. Muthen, B. (1986). Some uses of structural equation modelingin validity studies: Extending IRTto external variables using SIMS results. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 293 888)
107. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
108. Newmann, F. M. (1991). Linking restructuring to authentic student achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 458-463.
109. Ni, Y-J. (1993). Applying CRESST history assessment specifications and scoring rubrics to upper elementary level history assessment (Project Report). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
110. Niemi, D. (1994a). Assessing fifth-grade students’ fraction understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
111. Niemi, D. (1994b). Teachers understanding of the link between instruction and assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
112. Noble, A. J., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Measurement-driven reform: The more things change, the more they stay the same (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 373). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
113. Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117-154.
114. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
115. Oakes, J. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181-199.
116. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Baker, E. L. (Eds.). (1994). Technology assessment in software applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
117. Pace, R. C. (1986). Quality, content, and context in the assessment of student learning and development in college (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 256). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
118. Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
119. Patton, M. Q. (1988). The evaluator’s responsibility for utilization. Evaluation Practice, 9(2), 5-24.
120. Petry, B., Mouton, H., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). A lesson based on the Gagne-Briggs theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 11-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Phillips, S. E. (1994, September). Legal and political issues surrounding performance assessment. Symposium conducted at the 1994 CRESST Conference, University of California, Los Angeles.
122. Popham, W. J. (1967). Development of a performance test of teaching proficiency. Los Angeles: University of California.
123. Popham, W. J. (1975). Educational evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
124. Popham, W. J. (1988). Educational evaluation (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
125. Popham, W. J., & Baker, E. L. (1970). Systematic instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
126. Popham, W. J., & Husek, T. R. (1969). Implications of criterion-referenced measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 6(1), 1-9.
127. Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 73(1), 13-29.
128. Provus, M. M. (1969). Evaluation of ongoing programs in the public school system. In R. W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means. (68th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II, pp. 242-283). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
129. Pullin, P. (1982). Minimum competency testing, the denied diploma, and the pursuit of educational opportunity and educational adequacy (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 180). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
130. Raizen, S. A., & Jones, L. V. (Eds.). (1985). Indicators of precollege education in science and mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 273)
131. Redfield, D. L. (1990). Evaluating the broad educational impact of an arts education program: The case of the Music Center of Los Angeles County’s Artists-in-Residence program. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 578)
132. Rein, M., & White, S. H. (1977, Fall). Can policy research help policy? Public Interest, 49, 119-136.
133. Resnick, L. B. (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
134. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1989, October). Tests as standards of achievement in schools. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh
135. Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 421)
136. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1990). Tests as standards of achievement in schools. The uses of standardized tests in American education: Proceedings of the 1989 ETS Invitational Conference. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
137. Rice, J. M. (1893). The public-school system of the United States. New York: Century.
138. Rice, J. M. (1913). Scientific management in education. New York: Amo Press.
139. Rivlin, A. M., & Timpane, P. M. (1975). Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
140. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1983). Unintended consequences: Regulating the quality of subsidized day care. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3(1), 14-30.
141. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Wright, S. R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
142. Salasin, S. (1980). The evaluator as an agent of change. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 7, 1-9.
143. Schenck, E. A., & Beckstrom, S. (1993). Chapter 1 School Ade Project Study (Contract Nos. LC91027001 & LC91028001). Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corp.
144. Schlesinger, J. R. (1963). Quantitative analysis and national security. In Captain G. F. Smale (Ed.), National security management: A commentary on defense management, industrial College of the Armed Forces. Washington, DC: Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
145. Schmidt, W. (1993a). Survey of mathematics and science opportunities (Research Report Series No. 56, TIMSS: Concepts, Measurements and Analyses. Draft document delivered to the International Coordinating Center). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
146. Schmidt, W. (1993b). Survey of mathematics and science opportunities (Research Report Series No. 57, TIMSS: Curriculum Analysis-A Content Analytic Approach. Draft document delivered to the International Coordinating Center). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
147. Schütz, R. E. (1970). Programmatic instructional development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 055 431)
148. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation (American Educational Research Association monograph series on evaluation, No. 1, pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
149. Scriven, M. (1973). Goal-free evaluation. In E. R. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 319-328). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
150. Scriven, M. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
151. Scriven, M. (1991). Beyond formative and summative evaluation. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II, pp. 19-64). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
152. Scriven, M. (1994). Evaluation as a discipline. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 147-166.
153. Shadish, R. J., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, R, C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
154. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (Eds.). (1989). Indicators for' monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
155. Shavelson, R. J., & Stasz, C. (1980). Some methods for representing structure of concepts in prose material. In J. Hartley (Ed.), The psychology of written communication. New York: Nichols.
156. Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (Eds.). (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis.
157. Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace’s School: Redesigning the American high school. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
158. Skinner, B. F. (1954, Spring). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24: 86-97.
159. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Reading effects of IBM's “Writing to Read” program: A review of evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 1-11.
160. Slavin, R. E., & Braddock, J. H. I. (1993). Ability grouping: On the wrong track. College Board Review, 168, 11-17.
161. Smith, E. R., & Tyler, R. W. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper.
162. Smith, M. S. (1975). Evaluation findings in Head Start Planned Variation. In A. M. Rivlin & P. M. Timpane (Eds.), Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? (pp. 101-111). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
163. Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). London: Falmer Press.
164. Stake, R. E. (1973). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
165. Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5-8.
166. Stake, R. E. (1983). Stakeholder influence in the evaluation of Cities-in-Schools. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (pp. 15-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
167. Stake, R. E. (1991). Retrospective on “The countenance of educational evaluation.” In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds,), Evaluation and education at quarter century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II, pp. 67-88). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
168. Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case studies in science education. Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation.
169. Steffe, L. P., & Parr, R. B. (1968). The development of the concepts of ratio and fraction in the fourth, fifth and sixth years of the elementary school (Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning Technical Report No. 49). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
170. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1991). Professional standards and ethics for evaluators. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. II, pp. 249-282). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
171. Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
172. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Webster, W. J. (1981). An analysis of alternatives to evaluation. In H. E. Freeman & M. A. Solomon (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (6, pp. 70-85). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
173. Sugrue, B. (1994). Specifications for the design of problem-solving assessments in science (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 387). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
174. Tallmadge, G. K., & Wood, C. T. (1976, October). Users guide: ESEA Title I evaluation and reporting system. Mountain View, CA: RMC Research Corp.
175. Taylor, J. A, (1982). The infrastructure of innovation: The case of the National Diffusion Network. Andover, MA: NETWORK.
176. Thompson, H. L. (1993). Recharting the future of accreditation. Educational Record, 74(4), 39-42.
177. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: The psychology of learning (Vol. 2). New York: Columbia University.
178. Thorndike, E. L. (1926). The measure of intelligence. New York: Columbia University.
179. Thorndike, H. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvements in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261, 384-395, 553-564.
180. Tucker, M. (1991, April). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Select Education, Committee on Education and Labor. Hearing on the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Major R. Owens, Chairperson, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
181. Tyler, L. L., & Klein, M. F. (1976). Evaluating and choosing curriculum and instructional materials. Los Angeles: Educational Resource Associates.
182. Tyler, R. W. (1942, October). Some techniques used in the follow-up study of college success of graduates of the thirty schools participating in the Eight-Year Study of the Progressive Education Association. Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars, 18, 23-28.
183. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
184. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991, June). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills.
185. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
186. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
187. Weiner, N. (1948). Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.
188. Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
189. Weiss, C. H. (1973). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation, 1, 37-45.
190. Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531-45.
191. Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
192. Wholey, J. S. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management. Boston: Little, Brown.
193. Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.
194. Wildavsky, A. (1972). The self-evaluating organization. Public Administration Review, 32(5), 509-520.
195. Wiley, D. (1993). Opportunity to learn and mathematics achievement: Analyses of the CAP 1992 Springfield test. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, School of Education.
196. Willis, G. (Ed.). (1978). Qualitative education: Concepts and cases in curriculum criticism. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
197. Wolf, R. M. (1993, November). The National Assessment of Educational Progress: The nation’s report card. NASSP Bulletin, 77(556), 36-45.
198. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.
199. Worthen, B. R., & White, K. R. (1987). Evaluating educational and social programs: Guidelines for proposal review, onsite evaluation, evaluation contracts, and technical assistance. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.