The contemporary “Crisis” of masculinity in historical perspective

The Making of Masculinities: The New Men's Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 121-153

  Kimmel, Michael S ^a  

^a Rutgers University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084560091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315738505-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. J. Gerson and К. Peiss, “Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconcep-tualizing Gender Relations,” Social Problems 32, no. 4(April 1985):317-331.
2. M. Gould and R. Kern-Daniels, “Toward a Sociological Theory of Gender and Sex,” American Sociologist 12(1977):182-189.
3. H. Z. Lopata and B. Thorne, “On the Term 'Sex Roles',” Signs 3(1978):718-721.
4. J. Shapiro, “'Women's Studies': A Note on the Perils of Markedness,” Signs 7(1982):717-721.
5. J. Stacey and B. Thorne, “The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology,” Social Problems 32, no. 4(1985):301-316.
6. D. Tresemer, “Assumptions Made about Gender Roles” in Another Voice: Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social Science, ed. M. Millman and R. Von Kanter (Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor), pp. 308-339.
7. С. Smith-Rosenberg, Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America (New York: Knopf, 1985), pp. 268, 90.
8. D. Riesman, The Lonely Crowd (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), p. 18.
9. С. Hill, The Century of Revolution, 1603-1714 (New York: Norton, 1961), p. 308.
10. J. H. Plumb, The Growth of Political Stability in England, 1675-1725 (Har-mondsworth, England: Penguin, 1967), p. 136.
11. R. Lockyer, Tudor and Stuart Britain, 1471-1714 (New York: St. Martin's, 1964), p. 435.
12. L. Stone and J. F. Stone, An Open Elite? England, 1540-1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 402.
13. R. S. Schofield and E. A. Wrigley, The Population History of England, 1541-1871 (Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press), p. 176.
14. N. McKendrick, “Home Demand and Economic Growth: A New View of the Role of Women and Children in the Industrial Revolution,” in Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J. H. Plumb (London: Europa, 1974), p. 167.
15. F. Nussbaum, The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women, 1660-1750 (Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 1983), p. 9.
16. P. Laslett, The World We Have Lost (New York: Scribner's, 1965), p. 4.
17. A. Fraser, The Weaker Vessel (New York: Knopf, 1984), p. 467.
18. A. MacFarlane, Marriage and Love in England, 1300-1840 (New York: Blackwell, 1986), p. 162.
19. M. Rogin, Fathers and Children (New York: Pantheon, 1975), p. 162.
20. J. Dubbert, “Progressivism and the Masculinity Crisis,” in The American Man, ed. E. Pieck, and J. Pieck (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980), p. 307.
21. G.J. Barker-Benfield, The Horrorsof the Half Known Life: Male Attitudes Toward Women and Sexuality in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Harper & Row, 1976), p. 13.
22. T.J. Lears, No Place of Grace (New York: Pantheon 1982), p. 230.
23. J. Higham, Strangers in the Land: Pattern of American Nativism, 1860-1925 (New York: Atheneum 1971), p. 81.
24. W. L. Bowers, The Country Life Movement in America 1900-1920 (Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press, 1974).
25. W. Leach, True Love and Perfect Union: The Feminist Reform of Sex and Society (New York: Basic Books, 1980), p. 334.
26. F. L. Wright, The Future of Architecture (New York: Dover, 1970).
27. D. Pugh, Sons of Liberty: The Masculine Mind in Nineteenth Century America (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1983), p. 150.
28. D. Macleod, BuildingCharacterin the American Boy: The Boy Scouts, YMCA, and Their Forerunners, 1870-1920 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983), p. 32.
29. E. A. Rotundo, “Body and Soul: Changing Ideas of American Middle Class Manhood, 1770- 1920,” Journal of Social History 16, no. 4(1983):30.
30. C. Degler, At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 26-27.
31. A. Douglas, The Feminization of American Culture (New York: Knopf, 1977).
32. M. Hartman, “Sexual Crack-Up: The Role of Gender in Western History” (unpublished paper, Rutgers University, 1984), p. 13.
33. P. Gardella, Innocent Ecstacy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 116.
34. W. McKeever, Training the Boy (Nevi York: Macmillan, 1913).
35. H. James, The Bostonians (New York: Modern Library, 1965), p. 343.
36. P. Filene, “Between a Rock and a Soft Place: A Century of American Manhood” (ms., University of North Carolina, 1984), p. 10.
37. R. Bellah et al, Habits of the Heart (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 210.
38. M. Thompson, “Vigorous Men, a Vigorous Nation,” Independent, September 1, 1898, p. 610.
39. T. Roszak and B. Roszak, Masculine I Feminine (New York: Harper & Row, 1975), p. 92.
40. J. P. Hantover, “The Boy Scouts and the Validation of Masculinity,” in The American Man, ed. E. Pieck and J. Pieck (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980), p. 299.
41. M. Rosenthal, “Recruiting for Empire: Baden-Powell's Boy Scout Law,” Raritan 4, no. 1 (Summer 1984):46.
42. H. L. Horowitz, Alma Mater: Design and Experience in the Women's Colleges from Their Nineteenth Century Beginnings to the 1930s (New York: Knopf, 1984), p. 44.
43. S. Strauss, Traitors to the Masculine Cause: The Men's Campaign for Women's Rights (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1983), p. 229.
44. M. Forster, Significant Sisters: The Grassroots of Active Feminism (New York: Knopf, 1985), p. 252.
45. C. Falk, Love, Anarchy, and Emma Goldman (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1985), p. 254.
46. E. K. Trimberger, “Feminism, Men, and Modern Love: Greenwich Village, 1900-1925,” in Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1984), p. 136.