Annotating anaphoric shell nouns with their antecedents

LAW 2013 and ID 2013 - 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 112-121

  Kolhatkar, Varada ^a   Zinsmeister, Heike ^b   Hirst, Graeme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

TRAINING DATA;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 85084336367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2006. Identifying reference to abstract objects in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, pages 56-63, Potsdam, Germany.
2. Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):555-596, December.
3. Simon Philip Botley. 2006. Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1):73-112.
4. Donna K. Byron. 2003. Annotation of pronouns and their antecedents: A comparison of two domains. Technical report, University of Rochester. Computer Science Department.
5. Jon Chamberlain, Udo Kruschwitz, and Massimo Poesio. 2009. Constructing an anaphorically annotated corpus with non-experts: Assessing the quality of collaborative annotations. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on The People's Web Meets NLP: Collaboratively Constructed Semantic Resources, pages 57-62, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Bin Chen, Jian Su, Sinno Jialin Pan, and Chew Lim Tan. 2011. A unified event coreference resolution by integrating multiple resolvers. In Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 102-110, Chiang Mai, Thailand, November.
7. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37.
8. Stefanie Dipper and Heike Zinsmeister. 2011. Annotating abstract anaphora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 69:1-16.
9. Karën Fort, Adeline Nazarenko, and Sophie Rosset. 2012. Modeling the complexity of manual annotation tasks: a grid of analysis. In 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 895-910.
10. Barbora Hladká, Jiří Mírovský, and Pavel Schlesinger. 2009. Play the language: Play coreference. In Proceedings of the Association of Computational Linguistics and International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 209-212, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Pei-Yun Hsueh, Prem Melville, and Vikas Sindhwani. 2009. Data quality from crowdsourcing: A study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing, pages 27-35, Boulder, Colorado, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Varada Kolhatkar and Graeme Hirst. 2012. Resolving “this-issue” anaphora. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1255-1265, Jeju Island, Korea, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Klaus Krippendorff. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, third edition.
14. Heeyoung Lee, Marta Recasens, Angel Chang, Mihai Surdeanu, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. Joint entity and event coreference resolution across documents. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 489-500, Jeju Island, Korea, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Nitin Madnani, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Philip Resnik. 2010. Measuring transitivity using untrained annotators. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, pages 188-194, Los Angeles, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Rebecca J. Passonneau. 1989. Getting at discourse referents. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 51-59, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Massimo Poesio and Ron Artstein. 2008. Anaphoric annotation in the ARRAU corpus. In Proeedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
18. Sameer S. Pradhan, Lance A. Ramshaw, Ralph M. Weischedel, Jessica MacBride, and Linnea Micciulla. 2007. Unrestricted coreference: Identifying entities and events in OntoNotes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing, pages 446-453, September.
19. Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2000. English Abstract Nouns As Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Topics in English Linguistics 34. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin.
20. Rion Snow, Brendan O'Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast - but is it good? evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 254-263, Honolulu, Hawaii, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Renata Vieira, Susanne Salmon-Alt, Caroline Gasperin, Emmanuel Schang, and Gabriel Othero. 2002. Coreference and anaphoric relations of demonstrative noun phrases in multilingual corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Conference (DAARC 2002), pages 385-427, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
22. Aobo Wang, Cong Duy Vu Hoang, and Min-Yen Kan. 2012. Perspectives on crowdsourcing annotations for natural language processing. In Language Resources and Evaluation, volume in press, pages 1-23. Springer.
23. Bonnie Lynn Webber. 1991. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis. In Language and Cognitive Processes, pages 107-135.