An 'open clash between science and the church'?: Wilberforce, huxley and hooker on darwin at the British association, Oxford, 1860

Science and Beliefs: From Natural Philosophy to Natural Science, 1700-1900

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 171-193

  James, Frank A J L ^a  

^a DAVY FARADAY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084246798     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Stephen Jay Gould, 'Knight Takes Bishop?', Nat. Hist. (1986), 95(5), 18-33.
2. John Hedley Brooke, 'The Wilberforce-Huxley Debate: Why did it happen?', Sci. Christian Belief (2001), 13, 127-41 is excellent on the background contexts.
3. Janet Browne, 'The Charles Darwin-Joseph Hooker correspondence: an Analysis of manuscript resources and their use in biography', J. Soc. Bibliog. Nat. Hist. (1978), 8, 351-66, 361-2. Browne (2002), 113-25.
4. Ruth Barton, 'John Tyndall, Pantheist: a Rereading of the Belfast address', Osiris (1987), 3, 111-34.
5. Leonard Huxley, Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2 vols, London, 1900, 1, 181.
6. Frederick Temple, The Present Relations of Science to Religion. A sermon, Oxford, 1860.
7. R.G. Wilberforce, Life of... Samuel Wilberforce, 3 vols, London, 1880-82, 2, 450-51.
8. F. Darwin, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols, London, 1887, 2, 179-204.
9. A. Newton, 'Early Days of Darwinism', Macmillan's Magazine (1888), 58, 241-9, 248-9.
10. Frank M. Turner, 'The Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion: a Professional dimension', Isis (1978), 69, 356-76.