A coupling between internal flow and primary breakup simulations - Case of a compound nozzle

11th International Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems 2009, ICLASS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Berlemont, A ^a   Cousin, J ^a   Doring, M ^a   Menard, T ^a  

^a Unitéde Recherche Associée au Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 230   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIZATION; TURBULENCE;

FLOW CHARAC-TERISTICS; INITIAL CONDITIONS; INTERNAL FLOWS; NUMERICAL APPROACHES; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PRIMARY BREAKUPS; TURBULENCE LEVEL; VELOCITY PROFILES;

NOZZLES;

EID: 85084166486     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Heyse J, Schatz F, Ader B, Schlerfer J, Haubold S. Electroformed multilayer orifice plate for improved fuel injection characteristics. SAE Paper 971070, 1997.
2. Ren WM, Sayar H. Influence of nozzle geometry on spray targeting and atomization for port fuel injector. SAE Paper 2001-0608, 2001.
3. Nagasaka K, Takagi T, Koyanagi K, Yamauchi T. The development of fine atomization injector. JSAE 2000;21:309-13.
4. Triballier K, Cousin J., Dumouchel C. Relations between internal flow structures and disintegration processes in spray formation. Proc. of the ILASS-Europe 2002, Zaragoza, Spain, 2002.
5. Chen JL, Wells M, Creehan J. Primary atomization and spray analysis of compound nozzle gasoline injectors. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 1998;120:237-43.
6. Dumouchel C, Cousin J, Triballier K. On the role of the liquid flow characteristics on low-Weber number atomization processes. Exp. in Fluids 2005;38:637-47.
7. Glodowski ML, Michalek DJ, Evers LW. The use of results from computational fluid dynamic fuel injector modeling to predict spray characteristics. SAE Paper 961191, 1996.
8. Menard, T., Tanguy, S. and Berlemont, A., 2007. Coupling level set/VOF/ghost fluid methods: Validation and application to 3D simulation of the primary break-up of a liquid jet. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 33 (5), 510-524
9. Fluent User’s Guide, Fluent Inc., Lebanon, New Hampshire, 2004.
10. Nobari M.R., Jan Y.J., Tryggvason G., 1996: Head-on collision of drops – a numerical investigation. Physics of Fluids Vol 8, 1.
11. Gueyffier D., Li J., Nadim A., Scardovelli S., Zaleski S., 1999, Volume of Fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows J. Comp. Phys., 152, 423-456.
12. Sethian J A, Level Set Method and fast marching methods. Cambridge Univ.Press. 1999
13. Sussman M., Puckett E.G., 2000, A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows, J. Comp. Phys. 162, 301-337
14. Fedkiw R., Aslam T., Merriman B., Osher S., 1999, A non-oscillatory eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (The Ghost Fluid Method)J. Comp. Phys. 152, 457-492
15. Liu X D Fedkiw R Kang M, A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Poisson equation on irregular domains, J. Sci. Phys., 151-178 (2000)
16. Klein R., Sadiki S., Janicka T. 2003: A digital filter based genration of inflow data for spatially