Inferring scheduling behavior with hourglass

Proceedings of the 2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Regehr, John ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCHEDULING;

DATA VALUES; EXECUTION MODEL; FINE GRAINED; OPERATING SYSTEM KERNEL; REAL TIME PROGRAMS; REAL-TIME APPLICATION; SCHEDULING BEHAVIOR; TIME VALUES;

PROGRAM DEBUGGING;

EID: 85084164742     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. George Anzinger. The Linux High Resolution Timers Project. http://high-res-timers.sourceforge.net.
2. Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau and Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau. Information and control in gray-box systems. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Banff, Canada, November 2001.
3. Neil Audsley, Alan Burns, Mike Richardson, Ken Tindell, and Andy Wellings. Applying new scheduling theory to static priority pre-emptive scheduling. Software Engineering Journal, 8(5):284–292, September 1993.
4. Stephen Childs and David Ingram. The Linux-SRT integrated multimedia system: Bringing QoS to the desktop. In Proc. of the 7th Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2001), Taipei, Taiwan, May 2001.
5. Matthew Dillon. Design elements of the FreeBSD VM system. Daemon News, January 2000. http://www.daemonnews.org/200001/freebsd_vm.html.
6. Ashvin Goel and Jonathan Walpole. Gscope: A visualization tool for time-sensitive software. In Proc. of the 2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conf. FREENIX Track, Monterey, CA, June 2002.
7. Raj Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. Wiley, 1991.
8. Michael B. Jones and John Regehr. CPU Reservations and Time Constraints: Implementation experience on Windows NT. In Proc. of the 3rd USENIX Windows NT Symposium, pages 93–102, Seattle, WA, July 1999.
9. Michael B. Jones, John Regehr, and Stefan Saroiu. Two case studies in predictable application scheduling using Rialto/NT. In Proc. of the 7th Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2001), pages 157–164, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2001.
10. Michael B. Jones and Stefan Saroiu. Predictability requirements of a soft modem. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMETRICS Conf. on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Cambridge, MA, June 2001.
11. Linux/RK: A Resource Kernel for Linux. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/∼rajkumar/linux-rk.html.
12. Robert Love. Preemptible kernel and lock-breaking patches for Linux. http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux.
13. Andrew Morton. Low Latency Linux. http://www.zip.com.au/∼akpm/linux/schedlat.html.
14. Ragunathan Rajkumar, Kanaka Juvva, Anastasio Molano, and Shuichi Oikawa. Resource Kernels: A resource-centric approach to real-time and multimedia systems. In Proc. of the SPIE/ACM Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Networking, pages 150–164, San Jose, CA, January 1998.
15. John Regehr. SPAK: a static priority analysis kit. http://www.cs.utah.edu/∼regehr/spak.
16. John Regehr. Using Hierarchical Scheduling to Support Soft Real-Time Applications on General-Purpose Operating Systems. PhD thesis, University of Virginia, May 2001. http://www.cs.utah.edu/∼regehr/papers/diss.
17. John Regehr and John A. Stankovic. Augmented CPU reservations: Towards predictable execution on general-purpose operating systems. In Proc. of the 7th Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2001), pages 141–148, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2001.
18. John Regehr and John A. Stankovic. HLS: A framework for composing soft real-time schedulers. In Proc. of the 22nd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 2001), London, UK, December 2001.
19. Benno Senoner. Latencytest. http://www.gardena.net/benno/linux/audio.
20. David A. Solomon and Mark E. Russinovich. Inside Microsoft Windows 2000. Microsoft Press, third edition, 2000.
21. Amitabh Srivastava and Alan Eustace. ATOM: A system for building customized program analysis tools. In Proc. of the SIGPLAN’94 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 196–205, Orlando, FL, June 1994.
22. Vijay Sundaram, Abhishek Chandra, Pawan Goyal, Prashant Shenoy, Jasleen Sahni, and Harrick Vin. Application performance in the QLinux multimedia operating system. In Proc. of the 8th ACM Conf. on Multimedia, Los Angeles, CA, November 2000.
23. TimeSys Linux/GPL. http://www.timesys.com/products.
24. Ken Tindell, Alan Burns, and Andy J. Wellings. An extendible approach for analysing fixed priority hard real-time tasks. Real-Time Systems Journal, 6(2):133–151, March 1994.
25. Yu-Chung Wang and Kwei-Jay Lin. Implementing a general real-time scheduling framework in the RED-Linux real-time kernel. In Proc. of the 20th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 246–255, Phoenix, AZ, December 1999.
26. Karim Yaghmour and Michel R. Dagenais. Measuring and characterizing system behavior using kernel-level event logging. In Proc. of the USENIX 2000 Annual Technical Conf., pages 1–14, San Diego, CA, June 2000.