Interleaved practice with multiple representations: Analyses with knowledge tracing based techniques

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Rau, Martina A ^a   Pardos, Zachary A ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual interference; Intelligent tutoring system; Knowledge tracing; Multiple representations; Practice schedules

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DATA MINING; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

HIGHER LEARNING; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTERFERENCE EFFECTS; KNOWLEDGE TRACINGS; LEARNING RATES; MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION; TASK TYPE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85084012474     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Aleven, V., Mclaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. 2009. A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 105-154.
2. Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. 2002. Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 25-61.
3. Baker, R. S. J. D., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. 2007. The difficulty factors approach to the design of lessons in intelligent tutor curricula. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(4), 341-369.
4. Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. 2007. Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students' Understandings of Fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293-316.
5. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. 1995. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
6. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Hadley, W. S. 2001. Cognitive tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change. (pp. 235-263). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
7. De Croock, M. B. M., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. 1998. High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 249-267.
8. Pardos, Z. & Heffernan, N. (2010) Navigating the parameter space of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing models: Visualizations of the convergence ofthe Expectation Maximization algorithm. In Baker et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 161-170).
9. Pardos, Z. A., Dailey, M. D., Heffernan, N. T. (2010) Learning what works in ITS from non-traditional randomized controlled trial data. In Aleven et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on ITS2010 (pp. 41-50).
10. Pardos, Z. & Heffernan, N. (2011) KT-IDEM: Introducing Item Difficulty to the Knowledge Tracing Model. In Konstant et al. (Eds.) In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on UMAP 2011 (pp. 243-254).
11. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Tunc-Pekkan, Z., Pacilio, L., & Rummel, N. (accepted). How to schedule multiple graphical representations? A classroom experiment with an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. To appear in the proceedings of ICLS 2012.
12. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. 2009. Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Multiple Representations and Self-Explanation Prompts Support Learning of Fractions. In Dimitrova et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on AIED (pp. 441-448).