PSNR-based estimation of subjective time-variant video quality for mobiles

5th International Conference MESAQIN 2006: Measurement of Audio and Video Quality in Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Nemethova, Olivia ^a   Ries, Michal ^a   Zavodsky, Matej ^a   Rupp, Markus ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER TERMINALS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ESTIMATION QUALITY; HUMAN PERCEPTION; MEAN OPINION SCORES; OBJECTIVE PARAMETERS; PEAK-TO-SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIOS; QUALITY ESTIMATION; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY; VIDEO APPLICATIONS;

PACKET NETWORKS;

EID: 85083946415     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. ITU-R,”Recommendation BT.500-8: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures,” September 1998.
2. Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG),”Final Report from The VQEG on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment”, March 2000, available in http://www.vqeg.org/.
3. O. Nemethova, M. Ries, E. Siffel, M. Rupp,”Quality Assessment for H.264 Coded Low-Rate and low-Resolution Video Sequences,” Proc. of Conf. on Internet and Inf. Technologies (CIIT), St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, pp. 136-140, 2004.
4. A.J. Seyler, Z.L. Budrikis,”Detail perception after scene changes in television image presentations,” IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 31-42, Jan. 1965.
5. D. Pearson,”Viewer response to time-varying video quality,” Proc. of SPIE Human and Electronic Imaging III, vol. 3299, Apr. 1998.
6. ANSI T1.801.03,”American National Standard for Telecommunications: Digital Transport of One-Way Video Signals. Parameters for Objective Performance Assessment,” 2003.
7. S. Winkler”Digital Video Quality: vision models and metrics”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., The Atrium, Chichester, England, 2005.
8. M.H. Pinson, S. Wolf,”Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies,” Proceedings of SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing, Lugano, Switzerland, July, 2003.
9. A. Hanjalic,”Content-Based Analysis of Digital Video,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
10. O. Nemethova, M. Ries, A. Dantcheva, S. Fikar, M. Rupp,”Test Equipment for Time-Variant Subjective Perceptual Video Quality Testing with Mobile Terminals,” in Proc. of International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (HCI 2005), Phoenix, USA, November, 2005.
11. L. Gros, N. Chateau,”Instantaneous and Overall Judgements for Time-Varying Speech Quality: Assessments and Relationships,” Acta Acustica, vol. 87, pp. 367-377, 2001.