Perceived video streaming quality under initial buffering and rebuffering degradations

5th International Conference MESAQIN 2006: Measurement of Audio and Video Quality in Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Tan, Xiangchun ^a   Gustafsson, Jörgen ^a   Heikkilä, Gunnar ^a  

^a ERICSSON RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Quality model; Rebuffering interruption; Subjective quality; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEASUREMENT;

BUFFERING EFFECT; FRAME RATE; MOBILE USERS; PERCEIVED QUALITY; QUALITY MODELING; RADIO CONDITIONS; REBUFFERING INTERRUPTION; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY;

VIDEO STREAMING;

EID: 85083946027     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Video streaming to the mobile phone, http://www.ericsson.com/mobilityworld/sub/countries/croatia/news_en/n_2004_Video_streaming.shtml.
2. Cingular 3G streaming launched, http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/March2006/2735.htm, March, 2006.
3. th IEEE inter. symp. personal, indoor & mobile radio comm. (PIMRC 2000), pp.1032-1036, London, UK, Sept. 18-21, 2000.
4. Testing user perceived streaming video quality, http://www.eurescom.de/~public-webspace/P800series/P807/index.html, June, 1999.
5. M. Clarkpool, J. Tanner, “The effects of jitter on the perceptual quality of video”, Proc. of the 7th ACM inter. conf. on multimedia, pp. 115-118, Orlando, Florida, USA, Oct. 30 - Nov. 5, 1999.
6. S. Winkler and R. Campos, “Video quality evaluation for internet streaming application”, Proc. SPIE/IS&T, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging Vol 5007, pp. 104-115, Santa Clara, CA, Jan. 20-24, 2003.
7. Z. Wang, et. al., “Study streaming video quality: from an application point of view”, Proc. of the 11th ACM inter. conf. on multimedia, pp. 327-330, Berkeley, CA, USA, Nov. 02-08, 2003.
8. A. C. Dalal, E. Perry, “A new architecture for measuring and assessing streaming media quality”, Passive and Active Measurement Workshop Proceedings, La Jolla, CA, USA, pp. 223-231, Apr. 2003.
9. Multimedia group Test plan, draft ver.1.11, VQEG MM-190304002, Feb. 2006.
10. S. Winkler and F. Dufaux, “Video quality evaluation for mobile application”, Proc. SPIE/IS&T, Visual communication and Imaging processing, Vol. 5150, pp. 593-603, Lugano, Switzland, July 8-11, 2003.
11. Streamcheck, http://www.streamcheck.com, Oct. 2003.
12. ITU-T P.910, Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications
13. M. P. Hollier, et. al, “Multimodal perception”, BT Technol. J., vol. 17, pp. 35-46, 1999.
14. D. S. Hands, “A basic multimedia quality model”, IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 6, pp. 806-816, Dec. 2004.
15. S. Winkler, C. Faller, “Audiovisual quality evaluation of low-bit rate video”, Proc. SPIE/IS&T, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, pp. 139-148, San Jose, CA, Jan., 2005.
16. R. M. Hollier, “The significance of Cross-Modal Interaction in Audio-Visual quality perception”, IEEE Signal Processing Society, Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 13-15, 1999.