An assessment of published evaluations of requirements management tools

13th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Rainer, Austen ^a   Beecham, Sarah ^b   Sanderson, Cei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Literature Review; Requirements Management Tool; Scoping study; Systematic Mapping

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COSTS; PUBLISHING; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STUDENTS;

EVALUATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT TOOL; SCOPING; SYSTEMATIC MAPPING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 85083937193     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Arksey, H. and O'Malley, L. (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1): p. 19-32.
2. Dybå, T., Kitchenham, B.A., and Jorgensen, M. (2005), Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE Software, 22(1): p. 58-65.
3. nd (revised printing) edition, London: PWS Publishing Company.
4. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L. and Glass, R.L. (1994) Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers. IEEE Software, 11(4): p. 86-95.
5. Herceg, P. (2007), Defining Useful Technology Evaluations, Report number MTR070061R1, MITRE Corporation.
6. Kitchenham, B.A., Linkman, S. and Law, D. (1997) DESMET: a methodology for evaluating software engineering methods and tools. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 8(3): p. 120-126.
7. th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'08). University of Bari, Italy, 26 - 27 June 2008.
8. Rainer, A. and Beecham, S. (2008) A comparison of three literature searches for evaluations of requirements management tools, Technical Report UH-CS-TR-480, University of Hertfordshire: Hatfield, U.K.
9. th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'08), University of Bari, Italy, 26-27 June 2008.
10. Rainer, A. and Beecham, S. (2008) Supplementary Guidelines and Assessment Scheme for the use of Evidence Based Software Engineering, Technical Report CS-TR-469, University of Hertfordshire: Hatfield, U.K.
11. Rainer, A., Beecham, S., Veneziano, V., and Sanderson, C. (Submitted) An investigation of the literature review as a method of tool evaluation. IET Software.
12. Sanderson, C.B., (Submitted) A DESMET-based evaluation of commercial requirements management tools in an industrial setting, MSc thesis, School of Computer Science. University of Hertfordshire: Hatfield, UK.
13. Wohlin, C., Gustavsson, A., Höst, M., Mattsson, C. (1996) A Framework for Technology Introduction in Software Organizations. in Software Process Improvement Conference (SPI'96), Brighton, UK, 1996.
14. Zelkowitz, M.V., D. R. Wallace, and D. Binkley. The culture clash in software engineering technology transfer. in 23rd NASA/GSFC Software Engineering Workshop. 1998. Greenbelt, MD, (December, 1998). .
15. Zelkowitz, M.V., Wallace, D.R. and D. Binkley, D. (2003) Evaluation of new software engineering technologies in Software Engineering Empirical Validation, N. Juristo and A.M. Moreno, (eds), World Scientific Publishing. p. 229-263.