Value and choice: Examining their roles in digital piracy

Cyber Criminology: Exploring Internet Crimes and Criminal Behavior

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 141-154

  Higgins, George E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083699191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Agnew, R. (1995). Testing the leading crime theories: An alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 363-398.
2. Arneklev, B. J., Cochran, J. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi's "low self-control" stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107-127.
3. Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law and Society Review, 26, 343-372.
4. Baron, J. N. (1988). The employment relation as a social relation. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2, 492-525.
5. Business Software Alliance. (2003). Software piracy fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bsa.org
6. Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives in offending. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
7. Deci, E. L., Eghari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.
8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
9. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Higgins, G. E. (2003). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 441-458.
10. Gopal, R., Sanders, G. L., Bahattacharjee, S., Agrawal, M., & Wagner, S. (2004). A behavioral model of digital music piracy. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14, 89-105.
11. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
13. Higgins, G. E. (2005). Can self-control theory help understand the software piracy problem? Deviant Behavior, 26, 1-24.
14. Higgins, G. E. (2007). Digital piracy: An examination of low self-control and motivation using short-term longitudinal data. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 523-529.
15. Higgins, G. E., & Makin, D. A. (2004a). Does social learning theory condition the effects of low self-control on college students' software piracy? Journal of Economic Crime Management, 2, 1-22.
16. Higgins, G. E., & Makin, D. A. (2004b). Self-control, deviant peers, and software piracy. Psychological Reports, 95, 921-931.
17. Higgins, G. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2005). Can the theory of planned behavior mediate the effects of low self-control on alcohol use? College Student Journal, 39, 90-103.
18. Higgins, G. E., Wilson, A. L., & Fell, B. D. (2005). An application of deterrence theory to software piracy. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 12, 166-184.
19. Hinduja, S. (2001). Correlates of Internet software piracy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 369-382.
20. Hinduja, S. (2003). Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 49-61.
21. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
22. Hollinger, R. C. (1988). Computer hackers follow a Guttman-like progression. Sociology and Social Research, 72, 199-200.
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
24. Husted, B. W (2000). The impact of national culture on software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 431-438.
25. Koen, C. M., & Im, J. H. (1997). Software piracy and its legal implications. Security Journal, 31, 265-272.
26. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27. Motivans, M. (2004, October). Intellectual property theft, 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report [Report No. NCJ 205800]. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
28. Nagin, D. S. (1998). Deterrence and incapacitation. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), Handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 345-368). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467-496.
30. Paternoster, R., & Piquero, A. (1995). Reconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32, 251-286.
31. Piquero, A. R., & Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders' decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
32. Pogarsky, G. (2002). Identifying "deterrable" offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19, 431-453.
33. Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 501-534.
34. Rahim, M. M., Seyal, A. H., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2001). Factors affecting soft-lifting intention of computing students: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 385-405.
35. Rao, S. S. (2003). Copyright: Its implications for electronic information. Online Information Review, 27, 264-275.
36. Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 24, 234-255.
37. Tibbetts, S. G., & Gibson, C. L. (2002). Individual propensities and rational decision-making: Recent findings and promising approaches. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
38. Tibbetts, S. G., & Myers, D. L. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
39. Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457-471.
40. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, selfcontrol, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 180-213.