Introduction to EIA follow-up

Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-21

  Morrison Saunders, Angus ^a   Arts, Jos ^b,c  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083178165     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849770507-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Arts, J (1994) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment: From Ex Ante to Ex Post Evaluation’, in Voogd, H (ed) Issues in Environmental Planning, London, Pion Limited, pp 145-163
2. Arts, J (1998) EIA Follow-up -On the Role of Ex Post Evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment, Groningen, Geo Press
3. Arts, J and Nooteboom, S (1999) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment Monitoring and Auditing’, in Petts, J (ed) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment Volume 1. Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential, Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp 229-251
4. Arts, J, Caldwell, P and Morrison-Saunders, A (2001) ‘EIA Follow-up: Good practice and future directions: Findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 Conference’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 19, pp 175-185
5. Au, E and Sanvicens, G (1995) ‘EIA Follow-up Monitoring and Management’, in Environment Protection Agency (ed) International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment: Report of the EIA Process Strengthening Workshop, Canberra, 4-7 April 1995, Environment Protection Agency, available at www.deh. gov.au/assessments/eianet/eastudy/aprilworkshop/paper5.html
6. Bailey, J and Hobbs, V (1990) ‘A proposed framework and database for EIA auditing’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol 31, pp 163-172
7. Bailey, J, Hobbs, V and Saunders, A (1992) ‘Environmental auditing: Artificial waterway developments in Western Australia’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol 34, pp 1-13
8. Baker, J (2002) ‘A Framework for Environmental Assessment Follow-up’, presented at Assessing the Impact of Impact Assessment: Impact Assessment for Informed Decision Making, 22nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 15-21 June 2002, The Hague, The Netherlands, published on CD ROM: IA Followup Workshop, Hull, Quebec, Environment Canada
9. Barker, A and Wood, C (1999) ‘An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 19, pp 387-404
10. Bass, R and Herson, A (1994) CEQA Compliance: A Step-by-step Approach, Point Area, California, Solano Press Books
11. Beanlands, G and Duinker, P (1984) ‘An ecological framework for EIA’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol 18, pp 267-277
12. Bisset, R (1980) ‘Problems and issues in the implementation of EIA audits’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 1, pp 379-396
13. Bisset, R (1984) ‘Post-development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions’, Umweltpolitik, vol 4, pp 463-484
14. Bisset, R and Tomlinson, P (1988) ‘Monitoring and Auditing of Impacts’, in Wathern, P (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment, Theory and Practice, London, Unwin Hyman, pp 117-128
15. Brew, D and Lee, N (1996) ‘Monitoring, environmental management plans and postproject analysis’, EIA Newsletter, vol 12, pp 10-11
16. Buckley, R (1991) ‘Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol 18, pp 1-23
17. Caldwell, L, Bartlett, D, Parker, D and Keys, D (1982) A Study of Ways to Improve the Scientific Content and Methodology of Environmental Impact Analysis, Advanced Studies in Science, Technology and Public Affairs, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, US, Indiana University
18. Canter, L (1985) ‘Impact prediction auditing’, The Environmental Professional, vol 7, pp 255-264
19. Canter, L (1993) ‘The role of environmental monitoring in responsible project management’, The Environmental Professional, vol 15, pp 76-87
20. Culhane, P, Friesema, H and Beecher, J (1987) Forecasts and Environmental Decision-Making, The Content and Predictive Accuracy of Environmental Impact Statements, Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press
21. Davies, M and Sadler, B (1990) Post-project Analysis and the Improvement of Guidelines for Environmental Monitoring and Audit, Environmental Protection Series EPS 6/FA/1, Ottawa, Beauregard Printers Ltd
22. Dipper, C, Jones, C and Wood, C (1998) ‘Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: A review’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 41, pp 731-748
23. Elkin, T and Smith, G (1988) ‘What is a good environmental impact statement? Reviewing screening reports from Canada’s national parks’ Journal of Environmental Management, vol 26, pp 71-89
24. EPD, Environmental Protection Department (1996) Generic Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Government
25. Gallardo, A and Sanchez, L (2004) ‘Follow-up of a road-building scheme in a fragile environment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 24, pp 47-58
26. Glasson, J (1994) ‘Life after the decision: The importance of monitoring in EIA’, Built Environment, vol 20, pp 309-320
27. Holling, C (ed) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Chichester, UK, John Wiley
28. Hulett, J and Diab, R (2002) ‘EIA follow-up in South Africa: Current status and recommendations’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, vol 4, pp 297-309
29. International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK (1999), Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, available at www.iaia.org/publications.htm
30. Lee, N, Walsh, F and Reeder, G (1994) ‘Assessing the performance of the EA process’, Project Appraisal, vol 9, pp 161-172
31. Marcus, L (1979) A Methodology for Post-EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) Monitoring, US Geological Survey Circular 782, Washington, DC, US Geological Survey
32. Marshall, R (2001) ‘Application of mitigation and its resolution within Environmental Impact Assessment: an industrial perspective’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 19, pp 195-204
33. Marshall, R (2002) ‘Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow-up’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 20, pp 286-292
34. McCallum, D (1985) ‘Planned Follow-up, A Basis for Acting on EIAs’, presented at Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 27-28 June 1985
35. McCallum, D (1987) ‘Environmental Follow-Up to Federal Projects, a National Review’, in Sadler, B (ed) Audit and Evaluation in Environmental Assessment and Management. Canadian and International Experience Volume II. Supporting Studies Ottawa, Beauregard Press Ltd, pp 731-749
36. Morrison-Saunders, A and Bailey, J (1999) ‘Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship’, Environmental Management, vol 24, pp 281-295
37. Morrison-Saunders, A, Arts, J, Baker, J and Caldwell, P (2001) ‘Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 19, pp 289-296
38. Morrison-Saunders, A, Baker, J and Arts, J (2003) ‘Lessons from practice: Towards successful follow-up’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 21, pp 43-56
39. Munro, D, Bryant, T and Matte-Baker, A (1986) Learning From Experience, A State-ofthe-Art Review and Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment Audits, Canadian Environmental Assessment and Research Council (CEARC), Minister of Supply and Services, Canada
40. Noble, B (2003) ‘Auditing strategic environmental assessment practice in Canada’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, vol 5, pp 127-147
41. Noble, B (2004) ‘A state-of-practice survey of policy, plan, and program assessment in Canadian provinces’ Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 24, pp 351-361
42. Petts, J and Eduljee, G (1994) ‘Integration of monitoring, auditing and environmental assessment: Waste facility issues’, Project Appraisal, vol 9, pp 231-241
43. Ross, W (2000) ‘Reflections on an environmental assessment panel member’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 18, pp 91-98
44. Ross, W, Green, J and Croal, P (2001) ‘Follow-up Studies in Cumulative Effects: Management Implications in Developing Nations’, presented at Impact Assessment in the Urban Context, 21st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Cartagena, Colombia, 26 May-1 June 2001, published on CD ROM: IA Follow-up Workshop, Hull, Quebec, Environment Canada
45. Sadler, B (ed) (1987a) Audit and Evaluation in Environmental Assessment and Management, Canadian and Inter national Experience Volume I. Commissioned Research, Ottawa, Beauregard Press Ltd
46. Sadler, B (ed) (1987b) Audit and Evaluation in Environmental Assessment and Management. Canadian and International Experience Volume II. Supporting Studies, Ottawa, Beauregard Press Ltd
47. Sadler, B (1988) ‘Evaluation of Assessment: Post-EIS Research and Process Development’, in Wathern, P (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment, Theory and Practice, London, Unwin Hyman, pp 129-142
48. Sadler, B (1996) International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, Final Report, Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the International Association for Impact Assessment, Minister of Supply and Services, Canada
49. Sanvicens, G and Baldwin, P (1996) ‘Environmental monitoring and audit in Hong Kong’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 39, pp 429-441
50. Serafin, R, Nelson, G and Butler, R (1992) ‘Post hoc assessment in resource management and environmental planning: A typology and three case studies’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 12, pp 271-294
51. Shepherd, A (1998) ‘Post-project Impact Assessment and Monitoring’, in Porter, A and Fittipaldi, J (eds), Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, Fargo, ND, Army Environmental Policy Institute (AEPI), The Press Club, pp 164-170
52. Sippe, R (1997) ‘Establishing rules for environmental acceptability for reviewing EAs: The Western Australian experience’, Environmental Assessment, vol 5, pp 17-20
53. Storey, K and Jones P (2003) ‘Social impact assessment, impact management and follow-up: A case study of the construction of the Hibernia offshore platform’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 21, pp 99-107
54. Ten Holder, V and Verheem, R (1996) ‘Strategic EIA in The Netherlands’, in EIA Commission (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands, Experiences and Views Presented by and to the Commission for EIA, Utrecht, EIA Commission, pp 17-31
55. Therivel, R, Wilson, E, Thompson, S, Heaney, D and Pritchard, D (1992) Strategic Environmental Assessment, London, Earthscan
56. Therivel, R and Partidário, M R (1996) The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment, London, Earthscan
57. Thompson, D and Wilson, M (1994) ‘Environmental auditing: Theory and applications’, Environmental Management, vol 18, pp 605-615
58. Tomlinson, P and Atkinson, S (1987a) ‘Environmental audits, proposed terminology’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol 8, pp 187-198
59. Tomlinson, P and Atkinson, S (1987b) ‘Environmental audits, a literature review’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol 8, pp 239-261
60. UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1990) Post-project Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Series no 3, Geneva, United Nations
61. Wilson, L (1998) ‘A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 18, pp 59-71
62. Wood, C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment -A Comparative Review, 2nd edition, Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd
63. World Bank (1997) Environmental Perfor mance Monitor ing and Super vision, Environmental Assessment Sourcebook, Washington, DC, World Bank