Research on selection in an international context: Current status and future directions

Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 107-123

  Lievens, Filip ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083021849     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Adler, N. J., Doktor, R., & Redding, S. G. (1986). From the Atlantic to the Pacific century: Cross-cultural management reviewed. Journal of Management, 12, 295-318.
2. Arthur, W., Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154.
3. Arvey, R. D., Bhagat, R. S., & Salas, E. (1991). Cross-cultural and cross-national issues in personnel and human resources management: Where do we go from here? In G. R. Ferrris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 9. pp. 367-407). Greenwich: JAI Press.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Bartram, D., & Coyne, I. (1998). The ITC/EFPPA survey of testing and test use within Europe. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society's Occupational Psychology Conference, 12-18.
6. Bartram, D., & Coyne, I. (1998). Variations in National Patterns of Testing and Test Use: The ITC/EFPPA International Survey. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 249-260.
7. Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478-494.
8. Briscoe, D. R. (1997). Assessment centers: Cross-cultural and cross-national issues. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 261-270.
9. Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. (1996). Some French studies in selection and assessment. In M. Smith and V. Sutherland (Eds.), International review of professional issues in selection and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 165-168). New York: Wiley.
10. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143-159.
11. Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (1988). The emic strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in a nonwestern culture: Rationale, steps, and a Philippine illustration. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 140-163.
12. Collins, J. M., & Gleaves, D. H. (1998). Race, job applicants, and the flve-factor model of personality: Implications for black psychology, I/O psychology, and the flve-factor model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 531-544.
13. De Corte, W. (1999). Weighing job performance predictors to both maximize the quality of the selected workforce and control the level of adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 695-702.
14. De Jong, A., & Visser, D. (1999). Black and white employees' fairness perceptions of personnel selection techniques (Unpublished manuscript).
15. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational flelds. American Sociological Review, 4, 147-160.
16. Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 500-509.
17. Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52, 335-358.
18. Eder, R. W., & Harris, M. M. (1999). Employment interview research: Historical update and introduction. In R. W. Eder and M. M. Harris (Eds.), The employment interview handbook (pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Furrer, O., Liu, B. S., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The relationship between culture and service quality perceptions: Basis for international market segmentation and resource allocation. Journal of Service Research, 2, 355-371.
20. Ghorpade, J., Hattrup, K., & Lackritz, J. R. (1999). The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 670-679.
21. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
22. Harris, M. M., Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2003). Privacy and attitudes towards Internet-based selection systems: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 230-236.
23. Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (1989). Fairness in employment testing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Hattrup, K., Rock, J., & Scalia, C. (1997). The effects of varying conceptualizations of job performance on adverse impact, minority hiring, and predictor performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 656-664.
25. Hattrup, K., Schmitt, N., & Landis, R. S. (1992). Equivalence of constructs measured by job-speciflc and commercially available aptitude tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 298-308.
26. Herriot, P., & Anderson, N. (1997). Selecting for change: How will personnel and selection psychology survive? In N. R. Anderson and P. Herriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment. London: Wiley.
27. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
28. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
29. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the futureremembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
30. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
31. Huo, Y. P., Huang, H. J., & Napier, N. K. (2002). Divergence or convergence: A cross-national comparison of personnel selection practices. Human Resource Management, 41, 31-44.
32. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big flve revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
33. Jansen, P. G. W., & Stoop, B. A. M. (2001). The dynamics of assessment center validity: Results of a 7-year study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 741-753.
34. Johns, G. (1993). Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: Lessons from organi-zational innovation. Personnel Psychology, 46, 569-592.
35. Koch, M., Nam, S. H., & Steers, R. M. (1995). Human resource management in South Korea. In L. F. Moore and P. D. Jennings (Eds.), Human resource management on the Pacific Rim (pp. 217-242). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
36. Kras, E. S. (1988). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
37. Levy-Leboyer, C. (1994). Selection and assessment in Europe. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 173-190). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
38. Lievens, F.(2006). International situationaljudgmenttests. pp. 279-300. InJ. A. Weekleyand R.E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational judgment tests (SIOP Frontier Series). Mahwah, NJ: LEA
39. Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Brysse, K. (2003). Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 67-77.
40. Lievens, F., Highhouse, S., & De Corte, W. (2005). The importance of traits and abilities in supervisors' hirability decisions as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 453-470.
41. Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H., & Janssens, M. (1995). A paradigm for conflrmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 167-214.
42. Morishima, M. (1995). The Japanese human resource management system: A learning bureaucracy. In L. F. Moore and P. D. Jennings (Eds.), Human resource management on the Pacific Rim (pp. 119-150). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
43. Murphy, K. R., & Shiarella, A. H. (1997). Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: multivariate framework for studying test validity. Personnel Psychology, 50, 823-854.
44. Newell, S. & Tansley, C. (2001) International uses of selection methods. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 195-213). Chichester: Wiley.
45. O'Neill, H. M., Pouder, R. W., & Buchholtz, A. K (1998). Patterns in the diffusion of strategies across organizations: Insights from the innovation diffusion literature. Academy of Management Review, 23, 98-114.
46. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1999). Relative importance of personality dimensions for expatriate selection: A policy capturing study. Human Performance, 12, 275-294.
47. Peterson, N., Hough, L., Dunnette, M., Rosse, R., Houston, J., Toquam, J. L. & Wing, H. (1990). Project A: Specification of the predictor domain and development of new selection/classification tests. Personnel Psychology, 43, 247-276.
48. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2002). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 1186-1205.
49. Ployhart, R. E., Sacco, J. M., Nishii, L. H., & Rogg, K. L. (2004, April). The influence of culture on criterion-related validity and job performance. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
50. Ployhart, R. E., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., Sacco, J. M., & Rogg, K. L. (2003). The cross-cultural equivalence of job performance ratings. Human Performance, 16, 49-79.
51. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (3rd ed.). (2003). College Park, MD: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc.
52. Rowe, P., Williams, M., & Day, A. (1994). Selection procedures in North America. International Journal of Assessment and Selection, 2(2), 74-79.
53. Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-391.
54. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants' perception of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565-606.
55. Ryan, A. M., Wiechmann, D. & Hemingway, M. (2003). Designing and Implementing global staffing systems. Part II: Best practices. Human Resource Management, 42, 85-94.
56. Sackett, P. R., & Roth, L. (1996). Multistage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. Personnel Psychology, 49, 549-572.
57. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The flve-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
58. Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. R. (2002). Cognitive and GMA testing in the European Community: Issues and evidence. Human Performance, 15, 75-96.
59. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & De Fruyt, F. (2003a). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
60. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. P. (2003b). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068-1081.
61. Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2004). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187-196.
62. Saucier, G., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2000). Cross-language studies of lexical personality factors. In S. E. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
63. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human-Performance, 15, 187-211.
64. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1984). A within setting test of the situational specificity hypothesis in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 37, 317-326.
65. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
66. Schmitt, M. J., Kihm, J. A., & Robie, C. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153-193.
67. Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Schmitt, N., & Mills, A. E. (2001). Traditional tests and job simulations: Minority and majority performance and test validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 451-458.
69. Schmitt, N., Rogers, W., Chan, D., Sheppard, L., & Jennings, D. (1997). Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 719-730.
70. Schuler, R., Dowling, P., & DeCieri, H. (1993). An integrative framework of strategic international human resource management. Journal of Management, 19, 419-459.
71. Shackleton, V., & Newell, S. (1997). International assessment and selection. In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment. New York: Wiley.
72. Smith, H. J. (2001). Information privacy and marketing: What the U.S. should (and shouldn't) learn from Europe. California Management Review, 43, 8-33.
73. Smith, M., & Abrahamsen, M. (1992). Patterns of selection in six countries. The Psychologist, 5, 205-207.
74. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., Peterson, M. F., & Leung, K. (1998). Individualism/collectivism and the handling of disagreement: A 23-country study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 351-368.
75. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Schwartz, S. H., Ahmad, A. H., Akande, D., Andersen, J. A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., Davila, C., Ekelund, B., Francis, P.-H., Graversen, G., Harb, C., Jesuino, J., Kantas, A., Karamushka, L., Koopman, P., Leung, K., Kruzela, P., Malvezzi, S., Mogaji, A., Mortazavi, S., Munene, J., Parry, K., Punnet, B. J., Radford, M., Ropo, A., Saiz, J., Savage, G., Setiadi, B., Sorenson, R., Szabo, E., Teparakul, P., Tirmizi, A., Tsvetanova, S., Viedge, C., Wall, C., & Yanchuk, V. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 188-208.
76. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
77. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2001). Procedural justice in personnel selection: International and cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 124-137.
78. Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., & Brancart, S. (1999). Les ractions des candidats envers les techniques de slection du personnel: Une tude dans un contexte francophone (Reactions of job applicants to personnel selection techniques: An investigation in a French-speaking context). Le Travail Humain, 62, 347-361.
79. Stone, E. F., & Stone, D. L. (1990). Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 8, 349-411.
80. Such, M. J., & Hemingway, M. A. (2003, April). Examining the usefulness of empirical keying in the cross-cultural implementation of a biodata inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
81. Such, M. J., & Schmidt, D. B. (2004, April). Examining the effectiveness of empirical keying: A cross-cultural perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
82. Terpstra, D. E., & Rozell, E. J. (1997). Why some potentially effective staffing practices are seldom used. Public Personnel Management, 26 (4), 483-495.
83. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
84. Triandis, H. C., & Vassiliou, V. (1972). Interpersonal influence and employee selection in two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 140-145.
85. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978). Federal Register, 1978, 43, No. 166, 38290-38309.
86. Von Glinow, M. A., Drost, E. A., & Teagarden, M. B. (2002). Converging on IHRM best practices: Lessons learned from a globally distributed consortium on theory and practice. Human Resource Management, 41, 123-140.
87. Wiechmann, D., Ryan, A. M., & Hemingway, M. (2003). Designing and implementing global staffing systems. Part I: Leaders in global staffing. Human Resource Management, 42, 71-83.
88. Wilk, S. L., & Cappelli, P. (2003). Understanding the determinants of employer use of selection methods. Personnel Psychology, 56, 103-124.
89. Williamson, L. G., Campion, J. E., Malos, S. B., Roehling, M. A., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Employment interview on trial: Linking interview structure with litigation outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 900-912.