Victims’ rights and restorative justice: Piecemeal reform of the criminal justice system or a change of paradigm?

Crime, Victims and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 63-79

  Groenhuijsen, Marc ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082507099     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315094335-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. M. Brienen, M. Groenhuijsen & E. Hoegen, ‘Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Victim-Oriented Legal Reform in Europe’ Criminologie (vol. 33, no. 1, 2000), pp. 121-144.
2. United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, Centre for International Crime Prevention, New York 1999.
3. D. Miers, An International Review of Restorative Justice (Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 10, London, 2001).
4. J. Dig-nan & M. Cavadino, ‘Towards a framework for conceptualising and evaluating models of criminal justice from a victims’ perspective’ International Review of Victimology (1996), pp. 153-182.
5. E. Fattah, Trom a Guilt Orientation to a Consequence Orientation: A Proposed New Paradigm for the Criminal Law in the 21st Century in W. Küper & J. Welp ed., Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft: Festschrift für Walter Stree und Johannes Wessels zum 70. Geburtstag (Müller, Heidelberg, 1993), pp. 771-792.
6. E. Fattah, ‘Some reflections on the paradigm of restorative justice and its viability for juvenile justice’ in L. Walgrave ed., Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Potentialities, Risks and Problems (Leuven University Press, Leuven, 1998), pp. 389-401.
7. R.E. Barnett, ‘Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice’ Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political and Legal Philosophy (87/1, 1977), pp. 279-301.
8. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970).
9. H. Zehr, Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice (Scottdale, Pennsylvania/Waterloo, Ontario 1990), p. 82.
10. N. Christie, ‘Conflicts as property’ British Journal of Criminology (1771, 1977), pp. 1-15.
11. M. Young, ‘Restorative community justice in the United States: A new paradigm’ International Review of Victimology (1999), pp. 265-277.
12. M. Masterman, ‘The Nature of a Paradigm’ in I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave ed., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970), pp. 59-89.
13. K. Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies, Part II, The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath (5th edition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1966), p. 260.
14. J.O. Wisdom, ‘The Nature of "Normal" Science’ in P. Arthur Schilpp ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. 14 in The Library of Living Philosophers (Open Court Publishing Company, La Salle, Illinois, 1974), p. 829.
15. B.-D. Meier, ‘Restorative Justice: A New Paradigm in Criminal Law?’ European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (6/2, 1998), pp. 125-139.
16. European Forum for Victim Services, Statement of Victims’ Rights in the Process of Criminal Justice (London, 1996), p. 5.
17. J.J.M. van Dijk, Strafrechtshervormingen ten behoeve van het slachtoffer in international perspectief Justitiële Verkenningen (9, 1988), pp. 7-27.
18. J. Shapland & ai, Victims in the Criminal Justice System (Hants, Gower, Cambridge, 1985).
19. D. Moxon, J.M. Corkery & C. Hedderman, Developments in the use of compensation orders in magistrates’ courts since October 1988 (London: HMSO 1992).
20. M.E.I. Brienen & E.H. Hoegen, Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems, (Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, 2000), ch. 26, pp. 1057-1101.
21. J.W. De Keijser, Punishment and Purpose: From Moral Theory to Punishment in Action (Thela Thesis, Amsterdam/Leiden, 2000).
22. H.-J. Albrecht, ‘Kriminologische Perspektiven der Wiedergutmachung: Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde’ in A. Eser & al. ed., Neue Wege der Wiedergutmachung im Strafrecht (MaxPlanck-Institut, Freiburg i.Br., 1990), pp. 43-72.
23. M. Cavadino & J. Dignan, ‘Reparation, Retribution and Rights’ International Review of Victimology (1997), pp. 233-253.
24. M. Löschnig-Gspandl, Die Wiedergutmachung im österreichischen Strafrecht: Auf dem Weg zu einem neuen Kriminalrechtl (Verlag Österreich, Vienna, 1996), pp. 71.
25. K. Roach, ‘Changing punishment at the turn of the century: Restorative justice on the rise’ Canadian Journal of Criminology (2000), pp. 249-280.
26. E.GM. Weitekamp, ‘The Paradigm of Restorative Justice: Potentials, Possibilities and Pitfalls’ in J.J.M. van Dijk & al. ed., Caring for Crime Victims: Selected Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Victimology (Monsey, New York, 1999), pp. 122-123.
27. L. Zedner, ‘Victims’ in M. Maguire & al. ed., The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994), p. 1239.
28. M. Wright, ‘Can Mediation be an Alternative to Criminal Justice?’ in B. Galaway & J. Hudson ed., Restorative Justice: International Perspectives (Monsey, New York & Amsterdam, 1996), pp. 227-237.
29. C. Pelikan, ‘UN draft resolution on restorative justice programmes in criminal matters’ Newsletter of the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (Vol. 3, Issue 1, February 2002), p. 7.