Procedural justice and alternative dispute resolution

Procedural Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 121-136

  Vidmar, Neil ^a  

^a University School of Nursing   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082497019     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429444524-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Aubert, Vilhelm. 1963. Competition and Dissensus: Tow Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 7: 26-32.
2. Aubert, Vilhelm. 1967. Courts and Conflict Resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 11: 40-51.
3. Benjamin, Roger W. 1975. Images of Conflict Resolution and Social Control: American and Japanese Attitudes Toward the Adversary System. Journal of Conflict Resolution 19: 123-37.
4. Ellis, René, Geetha Ravindra, Neil Vidmar, and Thomas Davis. 1994. The Reversal Arbitration Board: An ADR Model for Resolving Intracorporate Disputes. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1994: 93-110.
5. Erlanger, Howard S., Elizabeth Chambliss, and Marygold Melli. 1987. Participation and Flexibility in Informal Process: Cautions From the Divorce Context. Law and Society Review 21: 585-604.
6. Felstiner, William L. F., Richard A. Abel, and Austin Sarat. 1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, and Claiming .. . Law and Society Review 15: 631-54.
7. Fischer, Karla, Rebecca M. Campbell, and Julian Rappaport. 1994. The Effect of Resource Availability on Battered Women's Decision to Follow Through with Court Orders of Protection.
8. Fischer, Karla, Neil Vidmar, and René Ellis. 1993. The Culture of Battering and the Role of Mediation in Domestic Violence Cases. Southern Methodist University Law Review 46: 2117-74.
9. Hamilton, V. Lee, and Joseph Sanders. 1992. Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Hans, Valerie, 1993. Attitudes Toward the Civil Jury: A Crisis of Confidence? In Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System, edited by Robert E. Litan. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
11. Hans, Valerie, and Neil Vidmar. 1986. Judging the Jury. New York: Plenum.
12. Houlden, Paulina, Stephen LaTour, Laurens Walker, and John Thibaut. 1978. Preferences for Modes of Dispute Resolution As a Function of Process and Decision Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14: 13-30.
13. Kressel, Kenneth, and Dean G. Pruitt. 1989a. Conclusion: A Research Perspective on the Mediation of Social Conflict. In Mediation Research, edited by K. Kressel and D. G. Pruitt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Kressel, Kenneth, and Dean G. Pruitt., eds. 1989b. Mediation Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Kritzer, Herbert M., William A. Bogart, and Neil Vidmar. 1991. The Aftermath of Injury: Cultural Factors in Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States. Law and Society Review 25: 449-543.
16. Leung, Kwok, and E. Allan Lind. 1986. Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status in Procedural Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1134-40.
17. Leventhal, Gerald S. 1976. Fairness in Social Relationships. In Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, edited by J. Thibaut, J. Spense, and R. Carson. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
18. Lind, E. Allan. 1990. Arbitrating High-Stakes Cases: An Evaluation of Court-Annexed Arbitration in a United States District Court. Santa Monica: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
19. Lind, E. Allan, Bonnie Erikson, Nehemia Friedland, and Michael Dickenberger. 1978. Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Resolution: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 22: 318-41.
20. Lind, E. Allan, Robert MacCoun, Patricia A. Ebener, William L. F. Felstiner, Deborah R. Hensler, Judith Resnick, and Tom R. Tyler. 1990. In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System. Law and Society Review 24: 953-96.
21. Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
22. MacCoun, Robert J., and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Basis of Citizens' Perceptions of the Criminal Jury: Procedural Fairness, Accuracy, and Efficiency. Law and Human Behavior 22: 333-52.
23. McEwen, Craig A., and Richard J. Maiman. 1984. Mediation in Small Claims Court: Achieving Compliance Through Consent. Law and Society Review 18: 11-50.
24. McEwen, Craig A., and Richard J. Maiman. 1986. In Search of Legitimacy: Toward an Empirical Analysis. Law and Policy 8: 257-74.
25. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1984. Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving. University of California Law Review 31: 754-842.
26. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1991. Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or 'The Law of ADR'. Florida State University Law Review 19: 1-46.
27. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, and Susan S. Silbey. 1984. What Do Plaintiffs Want? Reexamining the Concept of Dispute. Justice System Journal 9: 151-78.
28. Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1987. Taking Kawashima Seriously: A Review of Japanese Research on Japanese Legal Consciousness and Disputing Behavior. Law and Society Review 21: 219-42.
29. O'Barr, William M., and John M. Conley. 1985. Litigant Satisfaction Versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives. Law and Society Review 19: 661-701.
30. -. 1988. Lay Expectations of the Civil Justice System. Law and Society Review 22: 137-61.
31. Sarat, Austin, and William L. F. Felstiner. 1986. Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office. Law and Society Review 20: 93-134.
32. Sheppard, Blair H. 1985. Justice Is No Simple Matter: A Case for Elaborating Our Model of Procedural Fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 953-62.
33. Sheppard, Blair H., and Neil Vidmar. 1980. Adversary Pretrial Procedures and Testimonial Evidence: Effects of Lawyer's Role and Machiavellianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 320-32.
34. Starr, June, and Barbara Yngvesson. 1975. Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing in on Compromise Decisions. American Ethnologist 2: 553-66.
35. Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Laurence Erlbaum.
36. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37. Upham, Frank K. 1976. Litigation and Moral Consciousness in Japan: An Interpretive Analysis of Four Japanese Pollution Suits. Law and Society Review 10: 579-620.
38. Vidmar, Neil. 1984. The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization of Disputes and an Empirical Investigation. Law and Society Review 18: 515-50.
39. Vidmar, Neil. 1985. An Assessment of Mediation in a Small Claims Court. Journal of Social Issues 41: 127-44.
40. Vidmar, Neil. 1987. Assessing the Effects of Case Characteristics and Settlement Forum on Dispute Outcomes and Compliance. Law and Society Review 21: 155-64.
41. Vidmar, Neil. 1990. The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness. Law and Society Inquiry 15: 877-92.
42. Vidmar, Neil, and Nancy Laird. 1983. Adversary Social Roles: Their Effects on Witnesses' Communication of Evidence and the Assessment of Adjudicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 888-98.
43. Vidmar, Neil, and Jeffrey Rice. 1991. Jury-Determined Settlements and Summary Jury Trials: Observations About Alternative Dispute Resolution in an Adversary Culture. Florida State University Law Review 19: 89-104.
44. Vidmar, Neil, and Regina A. Schuller. 1987. Individual Differences and the Pursuit of Legal Rights: A Preliminary Inquiry. Law and Human Behavior 11: 299-317.