Overview: Markets, offshore sovereignty and onshore legitimacy

Global Financial Crime: Terrorism, Money Laundering and Offshore Centres

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 7-59

  Gilligan, George Peter ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082492583     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315254241-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Banks, A. (2002), ITIO Accuses OECD Of Double Standards, Tax-News.com, 15 February.
2. Beetham, D. (1991), The Legitimation of Power, Macmillan, London.
3. Braithwaite, J. (1989), Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Brauner, Y. (2002), An International Tax Regime in Crystallization-Realities, Experiences and Opportunities, NYU Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 43, New York.
5. Brinkley, J. (1999), Behind the Banking Bill, Years of Intense Lobbying, The New York Times, 23 October.
6. Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995), The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Agreements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Cobb, S.C. (1998), Global Finance and the Growth of Offshore Financial Centers: The Manx Experience, Geoforum, Vol.29, No.l.
8. Commonwealth Secretariat (2000), The Implications of the OECD Harmful Tax Competition Initiative for Offshore Finance Centres, London, 2000.
9. Dezelay, Y. (1993), Professional Competition and the Social Construction of Transnational Regulatory Expertise in Corporate Control and Accountability, J. McCahery, S. Picciotto and C. Scott (eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2003a), The Forty Recommendations, Paris.
11. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2003b), FATF withdraws countermeasures with respect to Ukraine and decides on date for counter-measures to Philippines, 14 February.
12. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2002a), FATF acts against terrorist financing, money laundering and non-cooperative jurisdictions, 1 February.
13. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2002b), Review to Identify NonCooperative Countries or Territories: Increasing the Worldwide Effectiveness of AntiMoney Laundering Measures, June, Paris.
14. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2002c), FATF decides to impose counter-measures on Ukraine: No counter-measures to apply against Nigeria at this time, 26 December, Paris.
15. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2002d), Russia, Dominica, Niue and Marshall Islands removed from FATF’s list of non-cooperative countries and territories, 11 October.
16. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2001a), FATF decides to impose counter-measures on Nauru, Paris.
17. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2001b), Review to Identify NonCooperative Countries or Territories: Increasing the Worldwide Effectiveness of AntiMoney Laundering Measures, June, Paris.
18. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2001c), Developments in NonCooperative Countries and Territories, September, Paris.
19. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2001d), Review of Anti-Money Laundering Systems and Mutual Evaluation Procedures 1992-1999, Paris.
20. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2000a), Review to Identify NonCooperative Countries or Territories: Increasing the Worldwide Effectiveness of AntiMoney Laundering Measures, June, Paris.
21. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2000b), Report on Non-Cooperative Countries and Territories, Paris.
22. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (2000c), Report on Money Laundering Typologies 1999-2000, Paris.
23. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (1998), 1997-1998 Report on Money Laundering Typologies, Paris.
24. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (1996), The Forty Recommendations, Paris.
25. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (1990), The Forty Recommendations, Paris.
26. Financial Stability Forum (2000), Report of the Working Group on Offshore Centres, 5 April.
27. Financial Stability Forum (2000), Financial Stability Forum Releases Grouping of Offshore Financial Centres (OFCs) to Assist in Setting Priorities for Assessment, May.
28. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998), Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
29. Franck, T.M. (1990), The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Franck, T.M. (1988), Legitimacy in the International System, American Journal of International Law, 82 (4).
31. Fukuyama, F. (1999), The Great Disruption, The Atlantic Monthly, 283.
32. Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self Identity, Self and Society in the Late Modem Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.
33. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
34. Gilligan, G.P. (2002), International trends in the regulation of the financial services sector, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 14.
35. Gilligan, G.P. (2001), Going Underground-The Not So New Way to Bank?, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol.9, No.2.
36. Gilligan, G.P. (1999), Regulating the Financial Services Sector, Kluwer Law International, London.
37. Greenslade, R. (1992), Maxwell’s Fall, Simon & Schuster, London.
38. Hampton, H.M. and Levi, M. (1999), Fast spinning into oblivion? Recent developments in money-laundering policies and offshore finance centres, Third World Quarterly, Vol.20, No.3.
39. Hampton, M.P. and Christensen, J. (1999), The British Isle Offshore Finance Centers of Jersey, Guernsey, and the Isle of Man: Should the Onshore State Act?, Tax Notes International, January 11.
40. Hampton, M. (1996), The Offshore Interface, Tax Havens in the Global Economy, Macmillan, London.
41. Hampton, M.P. (1994), Treasure islands or fool’s gold: Can and should small island economies copy Jersey?, World Development, 22.
42. Hartcher, P. (2003), ‘Bush vows to go it alone on Iraq’, The Australian Financial Review, 30 January.
43. Hawkins, K. (1984), Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
44. International Monetary Fund, (2000), Offshore Finance Centers, International Monetary Fund Background Paper, June 23 2000.
45. Janeba, E. and Schjelderup, G. (2002), Why Europe Should Love Tax Competition-and the U.S. Even More So, NBER Working Paper No. 9334, Cambridge MA.
46. Johnson, J. and Desmond Lim, Y.C. (2002), Money Laundering: Has the Financial Action Task Force Made a Difference?, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 10, No. 1.
47. Labaton, S. (1999), Agreement Reached on Overhaul of U.S. Financial System, The New York Times, 23 October.
48. Macdonald, R. (1998), Metaphors of Multiplicity: Civil Society, Regimes and Legal Pluralism, 15 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law.
49. Masciandaro, D. and Portolano, A. (2003)., It takes two to tango: International financial regulation and off-shore centres, Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. 6, Num. 4, pp 311-330.
50. Meidinger, E. (1987), Regulatory Culture: A Theoretical Outline, 9, Law and Policy.
51. Mitchell, D. (2002), Death of the EU Savings Tax Directive, Center for Freedom and Prosperity Strategic Memorandum, August 26.
52. Mitnick, B.M. (1980), The Political Economy of Regulation, Columbia University Press, New York7.
53. Moscarino, G.J. and Shumaker, M.R. (1997), Beating the shell game: Bank secrecy laws and their impact on civil recovery in international fraud actions, The Company Lawyer, Vol. 18, No.6.
54. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002a), OECD Says Barbados Will not Appear on its Forthcoming List of Uncooperative Tax Havens, 31 January, Paris.
55. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002b), Antigua and Barbuda commit to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 20 February, Paris.
56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002v), Grenada and St Vincent and the Grenadines commit to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 21 February, Paris.
57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002d), Guernsey and Jersey commit to Co-operate with OECD to address Harmful Tax Practices, 27 February, Paris.
58. Organisation for Economie Co-operation and Development (2002e), St Lucia Commits to the Principles of Transparency and effective Exchange of Information, 5 March, Paris.
59. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002f), Dominica Commits to the Principles of Transparency and effective Exchange of Information, 6 March, Paris.
60. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002g), Anguilla and Turks and Caicos Islands Commit to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 8 March, Paris.
61. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002h), US Virgin Islands Commits to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 11 March, Paris.
62. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002i), The Bahamas Commits to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 18 March, Paris.
63. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002j), Belize Commits to Cooperate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 20 March, Paris.
64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002k), Cook Islands Commits to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 27 March, Paris.
65. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002l), British Virgin Islands Commits to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 3 April, Paris.
66. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002m), Niue Commits to Cooperate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 15 April, Paris.
67. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002n), Panama Commits to Co-operate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 17 April, Paris.
68. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002o), Samoa Commits to Cooperate with OECD to Address Harmful Tax Practices, 18 April, Paris.
69. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002p), The OECD Issues The List of Unco-operative Tax Havens, 18 April, Paris.
70. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001), The OECD’s Project on Harmful Tax Practices: The 2001 Progress Report, November, Paris.
71. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000), Towards Global Tax Co-operation, Report to the 2000 Ministerial Council Meeting and Recommendations by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs, Progress in Identifying and Eliminating Harmful Tax Practices, Paris.
72. Parker, G. (2002), France and Germany call for EU tax accord, New York Times, 1 December.
73. Poser, N. (1991), International Securities Regulation-London’s 'Big Bang' and the European Securities Markets, Little, Brown & Co., Boston.
74. Putnam, R. (1996), The Strange Disappearance of Civil America, Policy (Autumn).
75. Raustalia, K. and Slaughter, A.M. (2002), International Law. International Relations and Compliance, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons and T. Risse-Kappen (eds), Handbook of International Relations, Sage Publications, London.
76. Reichman, N. (1992), Moving Backstage, Uncovering the Role of Compliance Practices in Shaping Regulatory Policy in White Collar Crime Reconsidered, K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds), Northeastern University Press, Boston.
77. Sanders, R. (2002), The Fight Against Fiscal Colonialism: The OECD and Small Jurisdictions, The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 365, London.
78. Sansonetti, R. (1999), The Mutual Evaluation Process: A Methodology of Increasing Importance at International Level, Journal of Financial Crime Vol.7, No.3.
79. Sieker, S. (2001), Offshore Financial Centers and “Harmful Tax Competition”: The Year 2000 in Review, Tax Notes International, 29 January.
80. Smith, A. (1884), The Wealth of Nations, T. Nelson and Sons, London.
81. Sorensen, P.B. (2001), International Tax Coordination: Regionalism Versus Globalism, CESIFO Working Paper No.483, Munich.
82. Stikeman, E. (2000), Towards A Level Playing Field-Regulating Corporate Vehicles in Cross-Border Transactions, ITIO and STEP, London.
83. Sumner, C.S. (1990), Rethinking deviance: towards a sociology of deviance, in C. Sumner (ed), Censure politics and criminal justice, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
84. Teubner, G. (1992), The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism, 13 Cardozo Law Review.
85. Tyler, T.R. (1990), Why People Obey the Law, Yale University Press, New Haven.
86. Underhill, G.R. (2000), The Public Good Versus Private Interests in the Global Monetary and Financial System’, International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal, Vol.2, No.3.
87. Walker, J. (1999), How Big is Global Money Laundering? Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol.3, No.l.
88. Wilkinson, M. (2003), ‘Bush makes case for war’, The Age, 30 January.
89. Wishart, D. (1994), Company Law in Context, Oxford University Press.
90. th International Cambridge Symposium on Economic Crime, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol.7 No.4.