The social management of genetic engineering: An introduction

The Social Management of Genetic Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 1-27

  Wheale, Peter ^a   McNally, Ruth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082473262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429423499-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Archer, M. (1996) ‘Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction’, Sociology, vol. 30, pp. 225-32.
2. Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
3. Beyertz, K. (1994) (ed.) The Concept of Moral Consensus: The Case of Technological Interventions into Human Reproduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Butler, D. (1997) ‘Bioethics needs better input from public’, Nature, vol. 389, p. 775.
5. Butler, D. et al. (1998) ‘Last chance to stop and think on risks of xenotransplants’, Nature, vol. 391, pp. 320-24.
6. COM (88) 424 final -SYN 146 Proposal for a Council Decision Adopting a Specific Research Programme in the Field of Health: Predictive Medicine: Human Genome Analysis (1989-1991), European Commission, Brussels.
7. Consumers’ Association (1997) Gene Cuisine: A Consumers’ Agenda for Genetically Modified Food, Policy Report, Consumers’ Association, London.
8. Cronberg, T. (1995) ‘Do marginal voices shape technology’, in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, Science Museum, London, pp. 125-33.
9. Davison, A. et al. (1997) ‘Problematic publics: a critical review of surveys of public attitudes to biotechnology’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 317-48.
10. DE, EN, FR (1997) Ethical Aspects of Cloning Techniques, EC, SG, Brey 7/320, Brussels.
11. Desmond, A. (1997) Huxley: Evolution’s High Priest, Michael Joseph, London.
12. Dietz, T. (1995) ‘Preface: Democracy and Science’, in Renn, O. et al., Huxley: Evolution’s High Priest,, pp. xvii-ix.
13. Durant, J. (1995) ‘An experiment in democracy’, in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds), Huxley: Evolution’s High Priest, pp. 75-80.
14. Ellis, N. (1997) ‘Towards a new social politics: citizenship and reflexivity in late modernity’, Sociology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 687-717.
15. European Commission (1993) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europeans Think About It In 1993: Eurobarometer 39.1, Report for the European Commission by INRA (Europe) European Coordination Office Unit Xii/E/1, Brussels.
16. European Commission (1997) The Europeans and Modern Biotechnology: Eurobarometer 46.1, Report for the European Commission by INRA (Europe) European Coordination Office Unit Xii/E/I, Brussels.
17. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997) The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Pinter, London and Washington, 3rd edition.
18. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1992) ‘Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science’, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 251-273.
19. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
20. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
21. Grundahl, J. (1995) ‘The Danish consensus conference model’, in Joss and Durant, Modernity and Self-Identity,, pp. 31-40.
22. Habermas, J. (1976) Legitimation Crisis, Heinemann, London.
23. Habermas, J. (1987a) ‘Questions and counterquestions,' in R.J. Bernstein (ed.) Hambermas and Modernity, Polity, Cambridge, (1987a), pp. 192-216.
24. Habermas, J. (1987b) The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and Rationalization of Society, Beacon, Boston.
25. Harris, J. (1997a) ‘Is cloning an attack on human dignity?', Nature, vol. 387, p. 754.
26. Harris, J. (1997b) ‘Cloning and bioethical thinking’, Nature, vol. 389, p. 433.
27. Hawkes, N. (1997) ‘Britain on alert as fears grow of new flu pandemic’, The Times, 20th December, p. 15.
28. HGAC & HFEA (1998) Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine: A Consultation Document, HGAC & HFEA, London.
29. Horlick-Jones, T. and De Marchi, B. (1995) ‘The crisis of scientific expertise in fin de siècle Europe’, Science and Public Policy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 139-45.
30. Hutchings, G. And Highfield, R. (1997) ‘Why bird flu threatens a way of life’. The Daily Telegraph, 18th December, p. 11.
31. Irwin, A. et al. (1994) ‘The social management of environmental change’, Futures, vol. 26, no.3, pp. 323-34.
32. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B (1996) (eds) Misunderstanding Science: Towards the Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Jasanoff, S. (1993) ‘Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis’, Risk Analysis, vol. 13, pp. 123-29.
34. Jorgensen, T. (1995) ‘Consensus conferences in the health care sector’, in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds), Risk Analysis,, pp. 17-29.
35. Joss, S. (1995) ‘Evaluating consensus conferences: necessity or luxury?', in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Risk Analysis,, pp. 89-108.
36. Joss, S. and Durant, J. (1995) ‘The UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 4, pp. 195-204.
37. Kant, I. (1948) Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, translated by H.J. Paton and published as The Moral Law, Hutchinson, London.
38. Kluver, L. (1995) ‘Consensus conferences at the Danish Board of Technology’, in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals,, pp. 41-49.
39. Magner, L.N. (1979) A History of the Life Sciences, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basle.
40. Mayer, I, et al. (1995) ‘An evaluation of the effects of participation in a consensus conference’, in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds), Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals,, pp. 109-24.
41. McClintock, B. (1978) ‘Mechanisms that rapidly reorganise the genome’, Stadler Genetics Symposium, vol. 10, pp. 25-48.
42. McClintock, B. (1984) ‘The significance of responses of the genome to challenge’, Science, vol. 226, pp. 792-801.
43. McNally, R. and Wheale, P.R. (1996) ‘Biopatenting and biodiversity: comparative advantages in the new global order’, The Ecologist, vol. 25, no. 5, September/October, pp. 222-28.
44. Melucci, A. (1985) ‘The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements’. Social Research, vol. 52, no. 4, Winter, pp. 789-816.
45. Melucci, A. (1989) Nomads of the Present, Hutchinson Radius, London.
46. Miller, D. (1988) ‘The ethical significance of nationality’, Ethics, vol. 98, pp. 647-62.
47. Mitchell, A. (1998) ‘Nuclear transplantation: the science of the lambs’, Nature, vol. 391, p. 21.
48. Nature (1997a) ‘Europe ambivalent on biotechnology’, vol. 387, pp. 845-47.
49. Nature (1997b) ‘After Dolly, meet Gene, the cloned calf, vol. 388, p. 611.
50. Nature (1997c) ‘Cloning for research “should be allowed’", vol. 388, p. 6.
51. Nature (1997d) ‘Republicans seek to widen cloning ban’, vol. 387, p. 748.
52. Nature (1997e) ‘US panel to back longer cloning ban, ducks thornier questions’, vol.387, p. 217.
53. Nature (1997f) ‘Short-circuit to be avoided by bioethics committees’, vol. 387, p. 321.
54. Nature (1998) ‘Hall the xeno-bandwagon: xenotransplantion’s risks make a moratorium essential’, vol. 391, p. 309.
55. Nelkin, D. (1977) Technological Decisions and Democracy, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
56. Nelkin, D. and Pollak, M. (1977) ‘The politics of participation in the nuclear debate in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Austria’, Public Policy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 333-57.
57. Partridge, P.H. (1963) ‘Some notes on the concept of power’, Political Studies, vol. XI, pp. 107-25.
58. Rayner, S. and Malone, E.L. ‘Zen and the art of climate maintenance’, Nature, vol. 390, pp. 332-34.
59. Renn, O. et al. (1995) (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston & London.
60. Rorty, R. (1994) Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. Sclove, R.E. (1995) Democracy and Technology, The Guildford Press, London & New York.
62. Scott, A. (1987) Pirates of the Cell: The Story of Viruses from Molecule to Microbe, Blackwell, Oxford.
63. Seale, J. (1988) '“Artificial” HIV?', Nature, vol. 335, p. 391.
64. Stent, G.S. (1971) Molecular Genetics: An Introductory Narrative, Freeman, San Francisco.
65. Tissier, P. Le and Stoye, P. (1997) ‘Two sets of human-tropic pig retrovirus’, Nature, vol.389, pp. 681-82.
66. Vig, N.J. (1992) ‘Parliamentary technology assessment in Europe: comparative evolution’, Impact Assessment Bulletin, vol. 10, p. 22.
67. Wadman, M. (1977a) ‘Backing for anti-cloning bill reopens embryo debate’. Nature, vol. 388, p. 505.
68. Wadman, M. (1997b) ‘EPA to be sued over gene-modified crops’, Nature, vol. 389, p. 317.
69. Wadman, M. (1998) ‘US ban would resist challenges in court’, Nature, vol. 391, p. 218.
70. Weiss, R.A. (1998) ‘Transgenic pigs and virus adaptation’, Nature, vol. 391, pp. 327-28.
71. Wheale, P.R. (1986) ‘Politics of Science and Technology’, in Wheale et al. People, Science and Technology, Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hampstead, pp. 44-58.
72. Wheale, P.R. (1995) ‘I’ve got you under my skin: ethical implications of the practice of xenografting’, in P.R. Wheale and R. McNally Animal Genetic Engineering: Of Pigs, Oncomice and Men, Pluto, London, pp. 211-25.
73. Wheale, P.R. (1996) The Social Management of Biotechnology, unpublished report to Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). NWO, The Hague, the Netherlands.
74. Wheale, P.R. and McNally R. (1988) Genetic Engineering: Catastrophe or Utopia?, Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
75. Wheale, P.R. and McNally, R. (1994) ‘What “bugs” genetic engineers about bioethics: the consequences of genetic engineering as post-modern technology’, in A. Dyson and J. Harris (eds) Ethics and Biotechnology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 179-201.
76. Wheale, P.R. and McNally, R. (1994) ‘What bugs genetic engineers about bioethics’, in A. Dyson and J. Harris (eds) Ethics and Biotechnology, Routledge, London, pp. 179-201.
77. Wheale, P.R. and McNally, R. (1996) ‘On how the people can become ‘The Prince’: Machiavellian advice to NGOs on GMOs’, in A. van Dommelen (ed.) Coping with Deliberate Release: The Limits of Risk-Assessment, ICHPA, Tilburg, pp. 177-94.
78. Wilmut, I. et al. (1997) ‘Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells, Nature, vol. 385, pp. 810-13.
79. Wright, S. (1997) ‘After Dolly, a slippery ban on human cloning’, GeneWatch, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 4-5.
80. Zimmerman, A.D. (1995) ‘Towards a more democratic ethic of technological governance’, Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 86-107.