How rational is rational lawmaking?

The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 93-103

  Cyrul, Wojciech ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082460512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315236841-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Aarnio, A. (1987), The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
2. Frank, J. (1932), ‘Mr. Justice Holms and Non -Euclidanian Legal Thinking’, Cornell Law Quarterly, Vol.17, pp. 568-603.
3. Goodnight, G.T. (1993), '“A New Rhetoric” for a “New Dialectic”: Prolegomena to a Responsible Public Argument’, Argumentation, Vol. 7, pp. 329-342.
4. Grzybowski, K. (1968), Historia doktryn politycznych i prawnych (The History of Legal and Political Doctrines), PWN, Warszawa.
5. Habermas, J. (1970a), ‘Toward a Theory of Communicative Competences’ in H. S. Dreitzel (ed.), Recent Sociology, nr. 2., Macmillan, New York.
6. Habermas, J. (1970b), Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
7. Habermas, J. (1981), Theory of Communicative Actions. Reason and Rationalisation of Society, Bacon Press, Boston.
8. Habermas, J. (1997), ‘Pojęcie racjonalności komunikacyjnej w świetle teorii aktów mowy’ in T. Buksiński (ed.), Rozumność i racjonalność (The Communicative Rationality in the Light of the Speech -Act Theory), Wydawnictwo Naukowe IF UAM, Poznań.
9. Habermas, J. (1999), ‘What is Universal Pragmatics’ in M. Cook (ed.), On the Pragmatics of Communication, Polity Press, Cambridge.
10. Hohmann, H. (2000), ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives’, Argumentation, Vol. 14, pp. 223-234.
11. Kubes, V. (1987), Theorie der Gesetzgebung, Springer-Verlag, Vienna/New York.
12. Kuhn, T.S. (2001), ‘Struktura rewolucji naukowych’(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions), Aletheia, Warszawa.
13. Kustra, E. (1994), Polityczne problemy tworzenia prawa (The Political Problems of Lawmaking), Wydawnictwo UMK, Toruń.
14. Leff, M. (2000), ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century’, Argumentation, Vol.14, pp. 241-254.
15. Mill, J.S. (1962), System logiki (A System of Logic), PWN, Warszawa.
16. Nonet, Ph. and Selznick, Ph. (1978), Law and Society in Transition, Towards Responsive Law, Harper and Row, New York (NY).
17. Piotrowski, R. (1988), Spór o model tworzenia prawa (A Dispute About the Model of Lawmaking), PWN, Warszawa.
18. Popper, K. R. (1971), The Open Society and Its Enemies, Princetown University Press, Princetown. Volume I
19. Rescher, N. (1977), Dialectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, State University of New York Press, Albany.
20. Sady, W. (2000), Spór o racjonalność naukową. Od Poincarégo do Laudana,(A Dispute about the Scientific Rationality. From Poincaré to Laudan, Wydawnictwo Funna, Wrocław.
21. Sarkowicz, R. and Stelmach, J. (1996), Teoria prawa, Monografie Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UJ, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków.
22. Skarga, B. (1983), ‘Trzy idee racjonalności’, Ruch filozoficzny, Vol. 5-6, pp. 87-117.
23. Stump, E. (1978), Boethius’s De topicis differentiis, Cornell University Press, Itaca, New York.
24. Thompson J.B. (1982), ‘Universal Pragmatics’ in J.B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas Critical Debates, The Macmillan Press, London/Basingstoke.
25. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1993), Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, London.
26. Van Der Poel, M. (2000), ‘Comments on ‘Meeting in the House of Callais’, Rhetoric and Dialectic’, Argumentation, Vol. 14, pp. 219-222.
27. Wróblewski, J. (1985), Teoria racjonalnego tworzenia prawa, Ossolineum, Wrocław