Procedural justice: Introduction and overview

Procedural Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 1-35

  Röhl, Klaus F ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082436018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429444524-2     Document Type: Editorial

References (137)

1. Adams, J. Stacy. 1963. Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 42.2-36.
2. Alexander, L. 1987. The Relationship Between Procedural Due Process and Substantive Constitutional Rights. University of Florida Law Review 39: 323-43.
3. Alexander, Sheldon, and Marian Ruderman. 1987. The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice Research 1: 177-98.
4. Alexy, Robert. 1978. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
5. Alexy, Robert. 1981. Die Idee einer prozeduralen Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Rechtstheorie Beiheft 2: 177-88.
6. Aubert, Vilhelm. 1963. Competition and Conflict Discussions: Two Types of Conflict and Conflict Resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 7: 26-42.
7. Austin, William, and Neil C. McGinn. 1977. Sex Differences in Choice of Distribution Rules. Journal of Personality 45: 379-94.
8. Barrett, Edith J., and Helmut Lamm. 1989. The Role of Procedural Justice in the Allocation of Limited Resources: A West German Perspective. Social Justice Research 3: 21-30.
9. Barrett-Howard, Edith, and Tom R. Tyler. 1986. Procedural Justice As a Criterion in Allocation Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 296-304.
10. Bayles, Michael D. 1990. Procedural Justice: Allocation to Individuals. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Berkemann, Jörg. 1989. Fairneß als Rechtsprinzip. Juristische Rundschau: 221-28.
12. Berkowitz, Leonard, and Elaine Walster, eds. 1976. Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
13. Bierbrauer, Günter. 1982. Gerechtigkeit und Fairness im Verfahren. In Alternativen in der Ziviljustiz, edited by E. Blankenburg et al. Köln. Bundesanzeiger.
14. Bierbrauer, Günter, Walther Gottwald, and Beatrix Birnbreier-Stahlberger, eds. 1995. Verfahrensgerechtigkeit. Rechtspsychologische Forschungsbeiträge für die Justizpraxis: Köln. Verlag Otto Schmidt.
15. Bierbrauer, Günter, Kwok Leung, E. Allan Lind, et al. 1994. Cultural and Situational Determinants of Disputing Preferences and Disputing Behavior. Working paper, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.
16. Bierhoff, Hans Werner. 1986. Sozialer Kontext als Determinante der wahrgenommenen Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 13: 66-78.
17. Bierhoff, Hans Werner. 1992. Prozedurale Gerechtigkeit: Das Wie und Warum der Fairneß. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 23: 163-78.
18. Bierhoff, Hans Werner, Ernst Buck, and Renate Klein. 1989. Attractiveness and Respectability of the Offender As Factor in the Evaluation of Criminal Cases. In Criminal Behavior and the Justice System, edited by H. Wegener, F. Lösel, and J. Haisch. New York: Springer Verlag.
19. Bies, R. J., and J. S. Moag. 1986. Interactional Justice—Communication Criteria of Fairness: In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. M. Sheppard, and H. M. Bazermann. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
20. Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
21. Blau, Peter M. 1968. Interaction—Social Exchange. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7, edited by D. L. Sills. New York: Macmillan.
22. Bora, Alfons. 1993. Gesellschaftliche Integration durch Verfahren—Zur Funktion von Verfahrensgerechtigkeit in der Technikfolgenabschätzung und bewertung. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 14: 55-79.
23. Bora, Alfons. 1995. Procedural Justice As a Contested Concept: Sociological Remarks on the Group Value Model. Social Justice Research 8: 175-95.
24. Brett, Jeanne. 1986. Commentary on Procedural Justice Papers. In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. Lewicki, B. M. Sheppard, and H. M. Bazermann. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
25. Capelletti, Mauro. 1988. Trends of 'Procedural Justice' in Contemporary Europe. In Festschrift für Werner Maihofer zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Arthur Kaufmann, E.-M. Mestmäcker, and H. Zacher. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.
26. Casper, Jonathan D. 1978. Having Their Day in Court: Defendant Evaluations of the Fairness of Their Treatment. Law and Society Review 12: 237-51.
27. Casper, Jonathan D., Tom R. Tyler and Bonnie B. Fisher. 1988. Procedural Justice in Felony Cases. Law and Society Review 22: 483-507.
28. Cohen, Ronald L. 1985. Procedural Justice and Participation. Human Relations 38: 643-63.
29. Cohen, Ronald L. 1987. Distributive Justice: Theory and Research. Social Justice Research 1: 19-40.
30. Connolly, Paul R. J., and Saundra Smith. 1983. The Litigant's Perspective on Delay: Waiting for the Dough. Justice System Journal 8: 271-86.
31. Cook, Karen S., ed. 1987. Social Exchange Theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
32. Damaska, M. 1975. Presentation of Evidence and Fact-Finding Precision. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123, 1083-1106.
33. van den Daele, Wolfgang. 1991. Zum Forschungsprogramm der Abteilung 'Normbildung und Umwelt'. Veröffentlichungsreihe der Abteilung Normbildung und Umwelt des Forschungsschwerpunkts Technik, Arbeit, Umwelt des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung Nr. FS II: 91-301.
34. Diamond, Stanley, and H. Zeisel. 1977. Book Review. Duke Law Journal: 1289-96.
35. Eder, Klaus. 1990. Prozedurales Recht und Prozeduralisierung des Rechts. Einige begriffliche Klärungen. In Wachsende Staatsaufgaben, sinkende Steuerungsfähigkeit des Rechts, edited by Dieter Grimm. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
36. Elster, John. 1990. Local Justice, Archives Européennes de Sociologie 31: 117-40.
37. Emerson, Richard M. 1972. Exchange Theory. In Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, edited by J. Berger, M. Zelditch, and B. Anderson. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
38. Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process is the Punishment. New York: Sage.
39. Fischer, Karla, Neil Vidmar, and René Ellis. 1993. The Culture of Battering and the Role of Mediation in Domestic Violence Cases. Southern Methodist University Law Review 46: 2117-74.
40. Folger, Robert. 1977. Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of 'Voice' and Improvement on Experienced Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 108-19.
41. Folger, Robert. 1987. Distributive and Procedural Justice in the Workplace. Social Justice Research 1: 143-59.
42. Folger, Robert, and Jerald Greenberg. 1985. Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personal Systems. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, edited by K. M. Rowland and G. R. Ferris. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
43. Fry, W. R. and Cheney, G. 1981. Perceptions of Procedural Fairness As a Function of Distributive Preferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit.
44. Fry, W. R., and G. S. Leventhal. 1979. Cross-Situational Procedural Preferences: A Comparison of Allocation Preferences and Equity Across Different Social Settings. Paper presented at the annua! meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington, D. C.
45. Gibson, James L. 1989. Understanding of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance. Law and Society Review 23: 469-96.
46. Gibson, James L. 1991. Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality. Law and Society Review 25: 631-5.
47. Gilles, Peter. 1981. Zum Bedeutungszuwachs und Funktionswandel des Prozeßrechts. Juristische Schulung: 402-09.
48. Gilles, Peter. 1992. Material vs. Formal View of Procedure and Legitimation of Judicial Decisionmaking Through Procedural Norms. Paper prepared for an Onati workshop on procedural justice, 8-11 June, Onati, Spain.
49. Gouldner, Alvin W, and J. Timothy Sprehe. 1965. The Study of Man.
50. Greenberg, Jerald, and Robert Folger. 1983. Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effects in Groups and Organizations. In Basic Group Processes, edited by P. B. Paulus. New York: Springer Verlag.
51. Greenberg, Jerald, and Tom R. Tyler. 1987. Why Procedural Justice in Organizations? Social Justice Research 1: 127-42.
52. Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
53. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität möglich? Kritische Justiz 20: 1-16.
54. Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
55. Haller, Volkmar. 1987. Zum Einfluß von Urteilshöhe und empfundender distributiver und prozeduraler Gerechtigkeit auf die Urteilszufriedenheit sowie auf die Beurteilung von Richter und Gerichtsbarkeit bei jugendlichen Strafgefangenen. Diss., Faculty of Psychology, Philips-Universität Marburg.
56. Haller, Volkmar, and Stefan Machura. 1995. Procedural Justice at German Courts As Seen by Defendants and Juvenile Prisoners. Social Justice Research 8: 197-215.
57. Hartmann, Michael. 1987. Reflexives Recht am Ende? Zum Eindringen materiellen Rechts in die Tarif autonomic Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16: 16-32.
58. Hayden, Robert M., and Jill K. Anderson. 1979. On the Evaluation of Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments: A Critique of Thibaut and Walker. Law and Human Behavior 3: 21-38.
59. Heinz, A. M. 1985. Procedure Versus Consequence: Experimental Evidence of Preferences for Procedural and Distributive Justice. In Courts and Criminal Justice: Emerging Issues, edited by S. Talarico. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
60. Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang. 1989. Konfliktmittlerin Verhandlungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.
61. Hofmann, Roland. 1992. Verfahrensgerechtigkeit. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
62. Homans, George C. 1960. Theorie der sozialen Gruppe. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
63. Homans, George C. 1972. Elementarformen sozialen Verhaltens. 2nd ed., Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
64. Houlden, Pauline. 1981. Impact of Procedural Modification on Evaluations of Plea Bargaining. Law and Society Review 15: 267-316.
65. Kahn, Arnold, Robin E. Nelson, and William P. Gaeddert. 1980. Sex of Subject and Sex Compositon of the Group as Determinants of Reward Allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 737-50.
66. Kahn, Arnold, V. E. O'Leary, J. E. Krulewitz, and Helmut Lamm. 1980. Equity and Equality: Male and Female Means to a Just End. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2: 173-97.
67. Kaufmann, Arthur. 1989. Prozedurale Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
68. Klein, Renate, and Hans Werner Bierhoff. 1991. Responses to Achievement Situations. The Mediation Function of Perceived Fairness.
69. Ladeur, Karl Heinz. 1990. Selbstorganisation sozialer Systeme und Prozeduralisierung des Rechts. In Wachsende Staatsaufgaben—sinkende Steuerungsfähigkeit des Rechts, edited by Dieter Grimm. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
70. Landis, Jean M., and Lynne Goodstein. 1987. When is Justice Fair? An Integrated Approach to the Outcome Versus Procedure Debate. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 7: 675-707.
71. Landy, Frank J., Janet Barnes-Farell, and Jeanette N. Cleveland. 1980. Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation: A Follow-Up. Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 355-56.
72. Lane, Robert E. 1988. Procedural Goods in a Democracy: How One Is Treated Versus What One Gets. Social Justice Research 2: 177-92.
73. Lerner, Melvin J., and Linad A. Whitehead. 1980. Verfahrensgerechtigkeit aus der Sicht der Gerechtigkeitsmotiv-Theorie. In Gerechtigkeit und soziale Interaktion, edited by G. Mikula. Bern: Huber.
74. Lerner, Melvin J., and Sally C. Lerner, eds. 1981. The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. New York: Plenum.
75. Leung, Kwok, and E. Allan Lind. 1986. Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1134-40.
76. Leventhal, Gerald S. 1980. What Should Be Done With Equity Theory? In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis. New York: Plenum.
77. Lind, E. Allan. 1994a. Procedural Justice, Disputing, and Reactions to Legal Authorities. Working paper, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.
78. Lind, E. Allan. 1994b. Justice and Authority in Organisations. Working paper, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.
79. Lind, E. Allan, Bonnie E. Erickson, Nehemia Friedland, and Michael Dickenberger. 1978. Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Resolution: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 22: 318-41.
80. Lind, E. Allan, Robert J. MacCoun, Patricia A. Ebener, William L. F. Felstiner, Deborah R. Hensler, Judith Resnik, and Tom R. Tyler. 1990. In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of their Experiences in the Civil Justice System. Law and Society Review 14: 953-96.
81. Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
82. Luhmann, Niklas. 1969. Legitimation durch Verfahren. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
83. Macdonald, R. A. 1981. A Theory of Procedural Fairness. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol. 1: 3-34.
84. Machura, Stefan. 1994a. Procedural and Distributive Justice as Seen by German Defendants. Paper presented at Law and Society annual meeting, 17 June, Phoenix, Arizona.
85. Machura, Stefan. 1994b. Trust and Procedural Fairness: How Are Lawyers, Judges, and Public Prosecutors Seen by German Defendants? Paper presented at the thirteenth World Congress of Sociology, 18 July, Bielefeld, Germany.
86. Martin, Guido, Heidemarie Renk, and Margaretha Sudhof. 1989. Maßstäbe, Foren, Verfahren: Das Prozeduralisierungskonzept Rudolf Wiethölters. Kritische Justiz 22: 244-57.
87. Matsamura, Yoshiyuki. 1991. Procedural Justice in Dispute Resolution— Japan and the West. Paper presented at the Law and Society annual meeting, 26-29 June, Amsterdam.
88. McEwen, Craig A., and Richard J. Maiman. 1986. The Relative Significance of Disputing Forum and Dispute Characteristics for Outcome and Compliance. Law and Society Review 20: 439-47.
89. Nahamowitz, Peter. 1987. Effektivität wirtschaftlicher Steuerung—ein Beitrag zur Autopoiesis-Debatte. Kritische Justiz 20: 411-33.
90. Nahamowitz, Peter. 1988. Autopoiesis oder ökonomischer Staatsinterventionismus? Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 9: 36-73.
91. Nelson, William. 1980. The Very Idea of Procedural Justice. Ethics 90: 502-11.
92. Neumann, Ulfrid. 1989. Materiale und prozedurale Gerechtigkeit im Strafverfahren. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 101: 52-74.
93. Nothdurft, Werner. 1987. Die Ordnung des Konflikts. Gesprächsanalyse der Konfliktbehandlung in einer Güteverhandlung vor dem Schiedsmann. In Das Güteverfahren vor dem Schiedsmann, edited by Klaus F. Röhl. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.
94. O'Barr, William M., and John M. Conley. 1985. Litigant Satisfaction Versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives. Law and Society Review 19: 661-701.
95. O'Barr, William M., and John M. Conley. 1988. Lay Expectations of the Civil Justice System. Law and Society Review 22: 137-61.
96. Peters, Bernhard. 1991. Rationalität, Recht, und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
97. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
98. Rie, Michael A. 1990. Ökonomische Grenzen der Lebensrettung? Zur Mikroallokation in der Gesundheitspolitik. In Sicherheit und Freiheit, edited by C. Sachsse and E. H. Tristam. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
99. Röhl, Klaus F. 1987. Rechtssoziologie. Köln: Heymanns.
100. Rottleuthner, Hubert. 1983. Befriedigungswirkung und Befolgung bei Vergleichen. In Der Prozeßvergleich, edited by W. Gottwald, W. Hutmacher, K. F. Röhl, and D. Strempel. Bonn: Bundesanzeiger.
101. Schmidt, Volker H. 1992. Lokale Gerechtigkeit. Perspektiven soziologischer Gerechtigkeitsanalyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 21: 3-15.
102. Schmidt, Volker H. 1993. Zum Verhältnis prozeduraler und distributiver Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 13: 80-96.
103. Sheppard, Blair H., and Neil Vidmar. 1980. Adversary Pretrial Procedures and Testimonial Evidence: Effects of Lawyer's Role and Machiavellianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 320-32.
104. Spittler, Gerd. 1967. Norm und Sanktion—Untersuchungen zum Sanktionsmechanismus. Ölten: Walter.
105. Teubner, Gunther. 1982. Reflexives Recht. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie: 14-59.
106. Teubner, Gunther. 1989. Recht als autopoietisches System. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
107. Teubner, Gunther., ed. 1986. Autopoiesis in Law and Society. Berlin: De Gruyter.
108. Teubner, Gunther, and Helmut Willke. 1984. Kontext und Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 6: 4-35.
109. Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Laurence Erlbaum.
110. Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker. 1978. A Theory of Procedure. California Law Review 66: 541-66.
111. Treiber, Hubert. 1975. Verfahren als Herrschaftsmechanismus: Zu Niklas Luhmanns 'Legitimation durch Verfahren'. Kriminalsoziologische Bibliographie 8: 19-24.
112. Tyler, Tom R. 1984. The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience. Law and Society Review 18: 51-74.
113. Tyler, Tom R. 1987a. Conditions Leading to Value Expressive Effects in Judgements of Procedural Justice: A Test of Four Models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 333-44.
114. Tyler, Tom R. 1987b. Procedural Justice Research. Social Justice Research 1: 41-65.
115. Tyler, Tom R. 1988. What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures. Law and Society Review 22: 103-35.
116. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
117. Tyler, Tom R., and Andrew Caine. 1981. The Influence of Outcomes and Procedures on Satisfaction with Formal Leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 642-55.
118. Tyler, Tom R., Jonathan D. Casper, and Bonnie Fisher. 1990. Maintaining Allegiance to Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures. American Journal of Political Science 33: 61228.
119. Tyler, Tom R., and Robert Folger. 1980. Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction with Citizen-Police Encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1: 282-92.
120. Tyler, Tom R., Yuen J. Huo, and E. Allan Lind. 1993. Preferring, Choosing, and Evaluating Dispute Resolution Procedures: The Psychological Antecedents of Feelings and Choices. Working paper, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.
121. Tyler, Tom R., and E. Allan Lind. 1990a. Intrinsic Versus Community-Based Justice Models: When Does Group Membership Matter? Journal of Society Issues 46: 83-94.
122. Tyler, Tom R., and E. Allan Lind. 1990b. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. American Bar Foundation Working Paper Series. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
123. Tyler, Tom R., and Kathleen McGraw. 1986. Ideology and the Interpretation of Personal Experience: Procedural Justice and Political Quiescence. Journal of Social Issues 42: 115-28.
124. Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth A. Rasinski. 1991. Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson. Law and Society Review 25: 621-30.
125. Tyler, Tom R., Kenneth A. Rasinski, and Eugene Griffin. 1986. Alternative Images of the Citizen: Implications for Public Policy. American Psychologist 41: 970-8.
126. Tyler, Tom R., Kenneth A. Rasinski, and Eugene Griffin. 1988. Fairness and Vote Choice in the 1984 Presidential Election. American Politics Quarterly 16: 5-24.
127. Tyler, Tom R., Kenneth A. Rasinski, and Nancy Spodick. 1985. The Influence of Voice on Satisfaction With Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 7281.
128. Vidmar, Neil. 1987. Assessing the Effects of Case Characteristics and Settlement Forum on Dispute Outcomes and Compliance. Law and Society Review 21: 155-64.
129. Vidmar, Neil. 1990. The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness. Law and Social Inquiry 15: 877-92.
130. Vidmar, Neil, and Nancy Laird. 1983. Adversary Social Roles: Their Effects on Witnesses' Communication of Evidence and the Assessments of Adjudicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 888-98.
131. Vidmar, Neil, and Jeffrey Rice. 1991. Jury-Determined Settlements and Summary Jury Trials: Observations About Alternative Dispute Resolution in an Adversary Culture. Florida State University Law Review 19: 89-104.
132. Wasserman, David. 1987. Pure Procedural Justice in Law, Sports, and Organ Transplants. Paper presented at a meeting of the New York Society for Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18 November, New York.
133. Wasserman, David. 1989. Procedural Justice and the Convicted Criminal Defendant. Paper presented at Law and Society annual meeting, June, Madison, Wisconsin.
134. Wasserman, David. 1992. The Procedural Turn: Social Heuristics and Neutral Values. Paper prepared for an Onati workshop on procedural justice.
135. Wells, Gary L. 1992. Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability: Is Subjective Probability Enough? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 739-52.
136. Wiethölter, Rudolf. 1986. Materialization and Proceduralization in Modern Law. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, edited by G. Teubner. Berlin: De Gruyter.
137. Wiethölter, Rudolf. 1989. Proceduralization of the Category of Law. In Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate, edited by C. Joerges and D. M. Trubek. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.