Using cognitive interviewing to construct facial composites

Interviewing and Deception

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 41-63

  Koehn, Christine E ^a   Fisher, Ronald P ^b   Cutler, Brian L ^b  

^a Children's Services Council   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082255720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429428517-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Anderson, R.C. and Pichert, J.W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.
2. Aspley Limited. (1993). E-Fit. Aspley Limited, United Kingdom.
3. Bekerian, D.A. and Dennett, J.L. (1993). The Cognitive Interview. Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 275-298.
4. Berman, G. L., Cutler, B. L., and Foos, P. W. (1991). Attempts to improve face recognition accuracy by inducing holistic processing at retrieval. In D. F. Ross and M. P. Toglia (Chairs), Current trends in research on adult eyewitness memory and identification accuracy. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, D.C.
5. Chance, J. E., and Goldstein, A. G. (1976). Recognition of faces and verbal labels. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 384-386.
6. Christie, D. F. M. and Ellis, H. D. (1981). Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 358-363.
7. Cutler, B. L., Stocklein, C J. and Penrod, S.D. (1988). Empirical examination of a computerized facial composite production system. Forensic Reports, 1, 207-218.
8. Davies, G. and Milne, A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production: a function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 209-220.
9. Davies, G., Ellis, H. and Shepherd, J. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.
10. Davies, G., Milne, A. and Shepherd, J. (1983). Searching for operator skills in face composite reproduction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11, 405-409.
11. Duggal, S., Mickus, L., Daneker, E. and Kassin, S. (1992). Computerized facial composites and eyewitness recognition. Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston. Williams College.
12. Ellis, H. D. (1986). Face recall: A psychological perspective. Human Learning, 5, 189-196.
13. Ellis, H. D., Davies, G. M. and Shepherd, J.W.(1978). A critical examination of the Photofit technique for recalling faces. Ergonomics, 21, 297-307.
14. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. and Davies, G. (1975). An investigation of the use of the Photofit technique for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 29-37.
15. Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, 111: Charles C. Thomas.
16. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E. and Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 1-6.
17. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E. and Raymond, D. S. (1987a). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 177-185.
18. Fisher, R. P., McCauley, M. R. and Geiselman, R. E. (1994). Improving eyewitness testimony with the cognitive interview. In D. Ross, J. D. Read and M. Toglia (eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current Trends and developments. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., Raymond, D. S., Jurkevich, L. M. and Warhaftig, M. L. (1987b). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 291-297.
20. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., and Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412.
21. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P. and Holland, H. L. (1986). Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385-401.
22. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, E., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V. and Prosk, A. L. (1984).Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 130-138.
23. George, R. (1991). A field and experimental evaluation of three methods of interviewing witnesses/victims of crime. Unpublished manuscript. Polytechnic of East London, London.
24. InfoTec. (1991). FaceKit. InfoTec, Virginia.
25. Kohnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. and Bull, R. (1992). A meta-analysis on the effects of the cognitive interview. Paper presented at the European Conference of Psychology and Law. Oxford, England.
26. Laughery, K. R. and Fowler, R. H. (1980). Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 307-316.
27. Luu, T. N. and Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Cognitive retrieval techniques and order of feature construction in the formation of composite facial images. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 9, 34-39.
28. Mauldin, M.A. and Laughery, K.R. (1981). Composite production effects on subsequent facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 351-357.
29. McKelvie, S. J. (1976). The effects of verbal labeling on recognition memory for schematic faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 459-474.
30. Mueller, J. H., Carlomusto, M., and Goldstein, A. G. (1978). Orienting task and study time in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 313-316.
31. Penrod, S., Pappas, C. and Bull, M. (1992a). Preparation and recognition of known targets using the Mac-A-Mug Pro composite production system. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
32. Penrod, S. and Stocklein, J. (1992). Assessing the impact of production methods on the recognizability of computer-generated facial composites Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
33. Penrod, S., Thill, D. L. and Bull, M. (1992b). Identification of facial composites from a sequentially presented photographic lineup. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
34. Philips. (1992). CD-Fit. Philips Interactive Media Systems, United Kingdom.
35. Schooler, J. W. and Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
36. Shaherazam (1986). The Mac-A-Mug Pro Manual. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Shaherazam.
37. Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
38. Visatex Corporation. (1991). Compusketch. California: Campbell.
39. Wells, G. L. and Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12, 338-344.