The new creationism: Its philosophical dimension

The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-Evolutionism in English-Speaking Countries

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 175-192

  Ruse, Michael ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85081919895     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781351147323-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Barth, K. (1949), Dogmatics in Outline, New York: Harper and Row.
2. Behe, M. (1996), Darwins Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, New York: Free Press.
3. Bonhoeffer, D. (1979), Letters from Prison. Bethge, E. (ed.), enlarged edn., New York: Macmillan.
4. Buber, M. (1937), I and Thou. Edinburgh: Clark.
5. Bultmann, R. (1958), Jesus Christ and Mythology, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
6. Doolittle, R.F. (1997), ‘A Delicate Balance’, Boston Review, 22, (1), 28-29.
7. Gilkey, L.B. (1985), Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock, Minneapolis: Winston Press.
8. Gish, D. (1973), ‘Creation, Evolution, and the Historical Evidence’, American Biology Teacher, 35, 132-140.
9. Haldane, J.B.S. (1927), Possible Worlds, and Other Papers, London: Chatto and Windus.
10. Haught, J.F. (1995), Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation, New York: Paulist Press.
11. Johnson, PE. (1991), Darwin on Trial. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
12. Johnson, PE. (1993), Darwin on Trial, 2nd edn, Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
13. Johnson, PE. (1995), Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law and Education. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press.
14. Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Laudan, L. (1982), ‘Science at the Bar - Causes for Concern’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 7, 16-19.
16. McMullin, E. (1986), ‘Introduction’, in McMullin, E. (ed.), Evolution and Creation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1-58.
17. Morris, H.M. et al. (1974), Scientific Creationism, San Diego, CA: Creation-Life Publishers.
18. Overton, W.R. ([1982] 1988), ‘United States District Court Opinion: McLean versus Arkansas’, in Ruse, M. (ed.), But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 307-331.
19. Plantinga, A. (1991a), ‘When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible’, Christian Scholars Review, 21, (1), 8-32.
20. Plantinga, A. (1991b), ‘Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: A Reply to Van Till and McMullin’, Christian Scholars Review, 21, (1), 80-109.
21. Plantinga, A. (1991c), ‘An Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism’, Logos, 12, 27-49.
22. Plantinga, A. (1993), Warrant and Proper Function, New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Putnam, H. (1981), Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Quinn, P. L. (1984), ‘The Philosopher of Science as Expert Witness’, in Cushing, J.T., Delaney, C.F. and Gutting, G.M. (eds), Science and Reality: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Science, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 32-53.
25. Ruse, M. (1982), Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Ruse, M. (1984), ‘A Philosopher’s Day in Court’, in Montagu, A. (ed.), Science and Creationism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 311-342.
27. Ruse, M. (ed.) (1988), But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
28. Ruse, M. (1994), ‘Darwinism: Philosophical Preference, Scientific Inference, and Good Research Strategy’, in Buell, J. and Hearn, V (eds), Darwinism: Science or Philosophy? Foundation for Thought and Ethics, Richardson, Texas.
29. Schmidt, K. (1996), ‘Creationists Evolve New Strategy’, Science, 273, 420-422.
30. Stich, S. (1990), The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.