Automated classification of mouse pup isolation syllables: From cluster analysis to an excel based 'mouse pup syllable classification calculator'

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue DEC, 2012, Pages

  Grimsley, Jasmine ^a   Gadziola, Marie ^a,b   Wenstrup, Jeff James ^a,b  

^a Northeast Ohio Medical University   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Communication call; Isolation calls; Mouse pup calls; Mouse song; Vocalization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CBA MOUSE; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ELECTRONIC SPREADSHEET; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEALTH STATUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; PUP (RODENT); SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND RELATED PHENOMENA; SYLLABLE; TIME; VOCALIZATION;

EID: 85081761373     PISSN: 16625153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00089     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Berryman, J.C. (1976). Guinea-pig vocalizations: their structure, causation and function. Z Tierpsychol 41, 80-106.
2. Branchi, I., Santucci, D., Vitale, A., and Alleva, E. (1998). Ultrasonic vocalizations by infant laboratory mice: a preliminary spectrographic characterization under different conditions. Dev Psychobiol 33, 249-256.
3. Brudzynski, S.M., Kehoe, P., and Callahan, M. (1999). Sonographic structure of isolation-induced ultrasonic calls of rat pups. Dev Psychobiol 34, 195-204.
4. Chabout, J., Serreau, P., Ey, E., Bellier, L, Aubin, T., Bourgeron, T., and Granon, S. (2012). Adult male mice emit context-specific ultrasonic vocalizations that are modulated by prior isolation or group rearing environment. PLoS ONE 7, e29401.
5. Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., and Jeris, C. (2001). A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment, in: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. (San Francisco, California: ACM).
6. D'amato, F.R., Scalera, E., Sarli, C, and Moles, A. (2005). Pups call, mothers rush: does maternal responsiveness affect the amount of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse pups? Behav Genet 35, 103-112.
7. Elleithy, K. (ed.). (2010). Advanced Techniques in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. New York: Springer.
8. Grimsley, J.M., Monaghan, J.J., and Wenstrup, J.J. (2011). Development of social vocalizations in mice. PLoS ONE 6, e17460.
9. Hahn, M.E., Hewitt, J.K., Schanz, N., Weinreb, L, and Henry, A. (1997). Genetic and developmental influences on infant mouse ultrasonic calling. I. A diallel analysis of the calls of 3-day olds. Behav Genet 27, 133-143.
10. Hahn, M.E., and Schanz, N. (2002). The effects of cold, rotation, and genotype on the production of ultrasonic calls in infant mice. Behav Genet 32, 267-273.
11. Hammerschmidt, K., Reisinger, E., Westekemper, K., Ehrenreich, L, Strenzke, N., and Fischer, J. (2012). Mice do not require auditory input forthe normal development of their ultrasonic vocalizations. Bmc Neuroscience 13.
12. Holman, S.D., and Seale, W.T. (1991). Ontogeny of sexually dimorphic ultrasonic vocalizations in Mongolian gerbils. Dev Psychobiol 24, 103-115.
13. Holy, T.E., and Guo, Z. (2005). Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol 3, e386.
14. Keller, M., Douhard, Q., Baum, M.J., and Bakker, J. (2006). Destruction of the main olfactory epithelium reduces female sexual behavior and olfactory investigation in female mice. Chem Senses 31, 315-323.
15. Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Hoffman, H.S., and Griffith, B.C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 54, 358-368.
16. Liu, R.C., Miller, K.D., Merzenich, M.M., and Schreiner, C.E. (2003). Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations. J Acoust Soc Am 114, 3412-3422.
17. Mcallister, B.B., Kiryanova, V., and Dyck, R.H. (2012). Behavioural outcomes of perinatal maternal fluoxetine treatment. Neuroscience 226, 356-366.
18. Mercado, E., 3rd, Orduna, I., and Nowak, J.M. (2005). Auditory categorization of complex sounds by rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 119, 90-98.
19. Mooi, E., and Sarstedt, M. (2011). A concise guide to market research the process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. (Berlin; New York: Springer).
20. Nagy, CM., and Rockwell, R.F. (2012). Identification of individual Eastern Screech-Owls Megascops asio via vocalization analysis. Bioacoustics 21, 127-140.
21. Panksepp, J.B., Jochman, K.A., Kim, J.U., Koy, J.J., Wilson, E.D., Chen, Q., Wilson, C.R., and Lahvis, G.P. (2007). Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice. PLoS One 2, e351.
22. Portfors, C.V. (2007). Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 46, 28-34.
23. Pozzi, L., Gamba, M., and Giacoma, C. (2010). The use of Artificial Neural Networks to classify primate vocalizations: A pilot study on black lemurs. Am J Primatol 72, 337-348.
24. Ren, Y., Johnson, M., Clemins, P., Darre, M., Glaeser, S.S., Osiejuk, T., and Out-Nyarko, E. (2009). A Framework for Bioacoustic Vocalization Analysis Using Hidden Markov Models. Algorithms 2, 1410-1428.
25. Ricceri, L., Moles, A., and Crawley, J. (2007). Behavioral phenotyping of mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders: relevant social behavior patterns across the life span. Behav Brain Res 176, 40-52.
26. Rupniak, N.M., Carlson, E.C., Harrison, T., Oates, B., Seward, E., Owen, S., De Felipe, C, Hunt, S., and Wheeldon, A. (2000). Pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of substance P (NK(1)) receptors attenuates neonatal vocalisation in guinea-pigs and mice. Neuropharmacology 39, 1413-1421.
27. Sales, G.D., and Smith, J.C. (1978). Comparative studies of the ultrasonic calls of infant murid rodents. Dev Psychobiol 11, 595-619.
28. Scattoni, M.L., Gandhy, S.U., Ricceri, L., and Crawley, J.N. (2008). Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse model of autism. PLoS One 3, e3067.
29. Spss, I. (2001). The SPSS Twostep Cluster. Component. SPSS white papers/technical report. Chicago: TSCPWP-0101, SPSS.
30. Sugimoto, H., Okabe, S., Kato, M., Koshida, N., Shiroishi, T., Mogi, K., Kikusui, T., and Koide, T. (2011). A role for strain differences in waveforms of ultrasonic vocalizations during male-female interaction. PLoS ONE 6, e22093.
31. Takahashi, N., Kashino, M., and Hironaka, N. (2010). Structure of rat ultrasonic vocalizations and its relevance to behavior. PLoS ONE 5, e14115.
32. Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Boston, Mass.; London: Pearson Addison Wesley.
33. Theodoridis, S., and Koutroumbas, K. (1999). Pattern Recognition. San Diego: Academic Press.
34. Wesson, D.W., Donahou, T.N., Johnson, M.O., and Wachowiak, M. (2008). Sniffing behavior of mice during performance in odor-guided tasks. Chem Senses 33, 581-596.
35. Wetzel, W., Wagner, T., Ohl, F.W., and Scheich, H. (1998). Categorical discrimination of direction in frequency-modulated tones by Mongolian gerbils. Behav Brain Res 91, 29-39.
36. Wohr, M., Dahlhoff, M., Wolf, E., Holsboer, F., Schwarting, R.K., and Wotjak, C.T. (2008). Effects of genetic background, gender, and early environmental factors on isolation-induced ultrasonic calling in mouse pups: an embryo-transfer study. Behav Genet 38, 579-595.
37. Wohr, M., Roullet, F.I., and Crawley, J.N. (2011a). Reduced scent marking and ultrasonic vocalizations in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse model of autism. Genes Brain Behav 10, 35-43.
38. Wohr, M., Roullet, F.I., Hung, A.Y., Sheng, M., and Crawley, J.N. (2011b). Communication impairments in mice lacking Shank1: reduced levels of ultrasonic vocalizations and scent marking behavior. PLoS ONE 6, e20631.
39. Young, D.M., Schenk, A.K., Yang, S.B., Jan, Y.N., and Jan, LY. (2010). Altered ultrasonic vocalizations in a tuberous sclerosis mouse model of autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 11074-11079.
40. Zorrilla, E.P. (1997). Multiparous species present problems (and possibilities) to developmentalists. Dev Psychobiol 30, 141-150.