Sustainable use and conservation of the environmental resources of the etna park (unesco heritage): Evaluation model supporting sustainable local development strategies

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2020, Pages

  Sturiale, Luisa ^a   Scuderi, Alessandro ^a   Timpanaro, Giuseppe ^a   Matarazzo, Benedetto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Rough sets; Agriculture; Evaluation; Landscape management; Multi criteria decision aide (MCDA); Multifunctionality

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LANDSCAPE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PROTECTED AREA; RURAL AREA; SUSTAINABILITY; UNESCO;

CATANIA [SICILY]; ETNA; ITALY; SICILY;

EID: 85081279381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su12041453     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bresso, M. Per un'Economia Ecologica; NIS: Roma, Italy, 1993.
2. Fusco Girard, L. I beni ambientali: Valutazioni e strategie di conservazione tra conflitto e cooperazione. Genio Rural. 1994, 5, 35-44.
3. Peano, A. Aree protette e governo del territorio. In Parchi D'Europa. Verso Una Politica Europea per Le Aree Protette; Gambino, R., Talamo, D., Thomasset, F., Eds.; Edizioni ETS: Pisa, Italy, 2008.
4. Shmelev, E.S.; Rodriguez-Labajos, B. Dynamic Multidimensional Assessment of Sustainability at the Macro Level: The Case of Austria. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2560-2573. [CrossRef]
5. Tempesta, T. La stima del valore ricreativo del territorio: Un'analisi comparata delle principali metodologie. Genio Rurale. 1995, 12, 15-34.
6. Salberini, G. L'evoluzione della legislazione italiana in materia di aree protette. In Codice Delle Aree Protette; Marchisio, S., Salberini, G., Della Fina, V., Ferrajolo, O., Eds.; Giuffrè Editore: Milan, Italy, 1999; pp. 177-194.
7. Pappalardo, G.; Pilato, M.; Bracco, S. To what extent are local communities involved in the governance of protected areas? Experiences from a case study in Sicily (Italy). Qual. Access Success 2015, 16, 102-109.
8. Scuderi, A.; Sturiale, L.; Bellia, C.; Foti, V.T.; Timpanaro, G. The redefinition of the role of agricultural areas in the city in relation to social, environmental, and alimentary functions: The case of Catania. Riv. Studi Sulla Sostenibilità 2017, 2, 1-10.
9. Gallenti, G.; Troiano, S.; Marangon, F.; Bogoni, P.; Campisi, B.; Cosmina, M. Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials' preferences for wine purchasing: Evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy. Agric. Food Econ. 2019, 7, 12. [CrossRef]
10. Munaretto, S.; Siciliano, G.; Turvani, M. Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: A framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 74. [CrossRef]
11. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economia Delle Risorse Naturali e Dell' Ambiente; II Mulino: Bologna, Italy, 1991.
12. Romano, D.; Carbone, F. La valutazione economica dei benefici ambieniali: Un confronto fra approcci non di mercato. Riv. Econ. Agrar. 1993, 48, 19-62.
13. Torrieri, F.; Concilio, G.; Nijkamp, P. Decision Support Tools for Urban Contingency Policy. A Scenario Approach to Risk Management of the Vesuvio Area in Naples-Italy. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2002, 10, 95-112. [CrossRef]
14. Van Der Berghr, J.M.; Buttonn, K.J.; Nijkamp, P.; Pepping, G. Meta-Analysis in Environmental Economics; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
15. Tempesta, T.; Vecchiato, D. The value of a properly maintained hiking trail network and a traditional landscape for mountain recreation in the Dolomites. Resources 2018, 7, 86. [CrossRef]
16. Timpanaro, G.; Scuderi, A.; Foti, V.T.; Lo Giudice, V. The Social Relationships' effectiveness of "agrisocial" farms: A model of sustainable local development. Riv. Studi Sulla Sostenibilità 2015, 1, 99-116.
17. Soderberg, H.; Karman, E. MIKA: Methodologies for Integration of Knowledge Areas-The Case of Sustainable Urban Water Management; Dept. of Built Environment & Sustainable Development, Chalmers Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology: Goeteborg, Sweden, 2003.
18. Sturiale, L. Possibili modelli di valutazione. della compatibilité tra sviluppo. e tutela con particolare attenzione alle aree protette. In Proceedings of the Atti del XXX Incontro di Studio CeSET. Gestione delle risorse naturali nei territori rurali e nelle aree protette: Aspetti economic, giuridici ed estimativi, Potenza, Italy, 5-6 October 2000; pp. 161-195.
19. Simoncini, A. Quadro giuridico e amministrativo. In The Ministry of the Environment and Ced-Ppn (European Centre for Documentation on the Planning of Natural Parks, Department of Territorial, of the Politecnic of Turin), Il Sistema Nazionale Delle Aree Protette Nel Quadro Europeo: Classificazione, Pianificazione E Gestione; Altra linea edizioni: Turin, Italy, 2002; pp. 22-34.
20. Vargas Isaza, O.L. La evaluaciön multicriterio social y suaporte a la conservation de los bosques social multicriteria. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin 2005, 58, 2665-2683.
21. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
22. Sturiale, L. Criteri di valutazione per la fruizionesostenibiledellerisorsenaturali in areeprotette. In Pagine Di Estimo, Allegato N. 19-20 Quaderni Del Dipartimento Patrimonio Architettonico Ed Urbanistico; Gangemi Editore: Roma, Italy, 2000; pp. 9-14.
23. Casini, L.; Bernetti, L.; Menghini, S. Teoria delle "liberté" e metodi multicriterio per l'analisi delle condizioni di sviluppo rurale. Riv. Econ. Agrar. 1997, 52, 29-59.
24. Maestrelli, S. I parchi: Una risorsa nazionale per lo sviluppo di qualité. Geogr. Ital. Rev. 2001, 2, 219-225.
25. Scuderi, A.; Sturiale, L. Analysis of social network applications for organic agrifood products. Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 2014, 10, 176-189.
26. Carbone, F. La pianificazionemultifunzionaledelleforeste: l'applicazione di un modellointegrato MCDM-GIS. Aestimum 1999, 37, 67-101.
27. Nicoletti, A. Parchi e areeprotette. La Nuova Ecol. 1999, 2, 18.
28. Ferretti, V.; Bottero, M.; Mondini, G. A spatial decision support tool to study risk and opportunities of complex environmental systems. J. Environ. Account. Manag. 2015, 3, 197-212. [CrossRef]
29. MIPAAF. Le Aree Protette in Italia; MIPAAF: Roma, Italy, 2019.
30. Scuderi, A.; Sturiale, L.; Foti, V.T. The challenges and opportunity of protected natural areas in Italy: The case study of "Simeto oasis". Qual. Access Success 2017, 18, 401-408.
31. Foti, V.T.; Scuderi, A.; Stella, G.; Sturiale, L.; Timpanaro, G.; Trovato, M.R. The integration of agriculture in the politics of social regeneration of degraded urban areas. Green Energy Technol. 2018, 99-111.
32. Timpanaro, G.; Sturiale, L.; Foti, V.T. Sustainability as a business strategy in sicilian viniculture. Qual. Access Success 2016, 17, 186-191.
33. Scuderi, A.; Sturiale, L. Multi-criteria evaluation model to face phytosanitary emergencies: The case of citrus fruits farming in Italy. Agric. Econ. (Czech Republic) 2016, 62, 205-214. [CrossRef]
34. Papale, F.; Sturiale, C. Analisi del Settore Agro-Zootecnico; Parco dell'Etna: Nicolosi, Italy, 1994.
35. Calabrô, F.; Cassalia, G.; Tramontana, C. Evaluation Approach to the Integrated Valorization of Territorial Resources: The Case Study of the Tyrrhenian Area of the Metropolitan City of Reggio Calabria. In New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISHT 2018, Proceedings of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies-SIST, Reggio Calabria, 22-25 May 2018; Calabrô, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 101, pp. 3-12.
36. Sturiale, C. L'esercizio dell'agricoltura nei Parchi e Riserve. In Proceedings of the Atti del Convegno Provincialesu"Parchi e Riserve: Quale modello per un corretto sviluppo del territorio locale", Castiglione di Sicilia, Italy, 18 October 1997; pp. 34-48.
37. Pawlak, Z. Rough set approach to knotoledge-based decision support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1997, 99, 48-57. [CrossRef]
38. Greco, S.; Lo Cascio, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. A new rough set approach to evaluation of bankrupcty risk. In New Operational Tools in the Management of Financial Risks; Zopounidis, C., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
39. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. Rough approximation of a preference relation by fuzzy dominance relations. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Preferences and decision, Trento, Italy, 5-7 June 1997; pp. 70-72.
40. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. In ICS Research Report; Warsaw University of Technology: Varsavia, Poland, 1996.
41. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 129, 1-47. [CrossRef]
42. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. Dominance-based Rough Set Approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Ann. Oper. Res. 2010, 176, 41-75. [CrossRef]
43. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 138, 247-259. [CrossRef]
44. Matarazzo, B. L'approccio dei rough sets all'analisi delle decisioni. In Proceedings of the Atti del XXI Convegno Annuale, A.M.A.S.E.5., Roma, Italy, 10-13 September 1997.
45. Matarazzo, B.; Greco, S.; Slowinski, R. La teoria degli insiemi approssimati. In Strategie, Introduzione Alla Teorie Dei Giochi e Delle Decisioni; Stach, B.G., Ed.; Editore Giappichelli: Torino, Italy, 2019.
46. Chinnici, G.; Pecorino, B.; Scuderi, A. Environmental and economic performance of organic citrus growing. Qual. Access Success 2013, 14, 106-112.
47. Foti, V.T.; Scuderi, A.; Timpanaro, G. Organic Social agricoltur: A tool for rural development. Calit. Access Success 2013, 14, 266-271.
48. Sturiale, L.; Scuderi, A. The evaluation of green investments in urban areas: A proposal of an eco-social-green model of the city. Sustainability 2018, 10, 12. [CrossRef]
49. Fandel, G.; Gal, T. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Theory and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980.
50. Borrini-Feyerabend, G.; Phillips, A. Politiche del paesaggio per la conservazione dellanatura. Diversità, equità e cambiamento. Urbanistica 2009, 139, 52.
51. Ferretti, V.; Bottero, M.; Mondini, G. Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 644-655. [CrossRef]
52. Sturiale, L.; Trovato, M.R. ICTs and smart territories. the knowledge and use of the UNESCO heritage by using the QR codes system. In Proceedings of the7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment, HAICTA 2015, Kavala, Greece, 17-20 September 2015; Volume 1498, pp. 946-956.
53. Bresso, M. Riflessioni per la costruzione di un paradigma economico-ecologico. Oikos 1991, 43, 201-220.
54. Sturiale, L.; Scuderi, A. The role of green infrastructures in urban planning for climate change adaptation. Climate 2019, 7, 119. [CrossRef]
55. Calabrô, F.; Mallamace, S.; Meduri, T.; Tramontana, C. Unused Real Estate and Enhancement of Historic Centers: Legislative Instruments and Procedural Ideas. In New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISHT 2018, Proceedings of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies-SIST, Reggio Calabria, 22-25 May 2018; Calabrô, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 101, pp. 464-474.
56. Sturiale, L.; Scuderi, A.; Timpanaro, G.; Foti, V.T.; Stella, G. Social and inclusive "value" generation in metropolitan area with the "urban gardens" planning. Green Energy Technol. 2020, 285-302.