메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-287

Whistleblower Law: A Guide to Legal Protections for Corporate Employees

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85081066456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book
Times cited : (21)

References (137)
  • 2
    • 85183281190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • July 26
    • Congressional Record, pp. S7412-21 (July 26, 2002)
    • (2002) Congressional Record , pp. S7412-S7421
  • 3
    • 85183215651 scopus 로고
    • 87-ERA-38, Order Rejecting in Part, etc., by SOL, at 2-3, July 18
    • Polizzi v Gibbs & Hill, Inc., 87-ERA-38, Order Rejecting in Part, etc., by SOL, at 2-3 (July 18,1989).
    • (1989) Polizzi v Gibbs & Hill, Inc.
  • 4
    • 85183221719 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2004-SOX-2, D&O of ALJ, January 28
    • Morefield v Exelon Services, Inc., 2004-SOX-2, D&O of ALJ, p. 2 (January 28, 2004)
    • (2004) Morefield v Exelon Services, Inc. , pp. 2
  • 5
    • 85183210056 scopus 로고
    • of SOL, at 3, March 17
    • DSzO of SOL, at 3 (March 17,1995).
    • (1995) DSzO
  • 7
    • 85183240732 scopus 로고
    • 858 F.2d 957, 4th Cir
    • English v Whitfield, 858 F.2d 957, 961 (4th Cir. 1988).
    • (1988) English v Whitfield , pp. 961
  • 12
    • 85183229686 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 96-ERA-6, Order Denying Stay by ARB, October 16
    • McCafferty v Centerion, 96-ERA-6, Order Denying Stay by ARB (October 16, 1996).
    • (1996) McCafferty v Centerion
  • 13
    • 85183226318 scopus 로고
    • 82-ERA-5, slip op. of ALJ, at 1, May 3
    • Batts v TVA, 82-ERA-5, slip op. of ALJ, at 1 (May 3,1982).
    • (1982) Batts v TVA
  • 14
    • 85183266293 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 96-ERA-33, D&O of ARB, at 1 n. 1, August 1
    • Majors v Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., 96-ERA-33, D&O of ARB, at 1 n. 1 (August 1,1997).
    • (1997) Majors v Asea Brown Boveri, Inc.
  • 21
    • 85183231366 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 98-CAA-16, D&O of ARB, June 25
    • Moore v DOE, 98-CAA-16, D&O of ARB, p. 4 (June 25, 2001).
    • (2001) Moore v DOE , pp. 4
  • 22
    • 85183259222 scopus 로고
    • 93-CAA-4, D&O of SOL, at 32, April 3
    • Reid v Methodist Medical Center, 93-CAA-4, D&O of SOL, at 32 (April 3, 1995).
    • (1995) Reid v Methodist Medical Center
  • 23
    • 85183225643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 94-TSC-7, D&O of ARB, at 4, September 23
    • Robinson v Martin Marietta Services, 94-TSC-7, D&O of ARB, at 4 (September 23,1996).
    • (1996) Robinson v Martin Marietta Services
  • 24
    • 85183223653 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-WPC-l, D&O of ARB, at 5 n. 6, November 6
    • Tracanna v Arctic Slope Inspection Svc, 97-WPC-l, D&O of ARB, at 5 n. 6 (November 6,1997).
    • (1997) Tracanna v Arctic Slope Inspection Svc
  • 26
    • 85183270188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 94-SCA-14, D&O of ARB, September 30
    • In the Matter ofSupervan, Inc., 94-SCA-14, D&O of ARB, p. 5 (September 30, 2002)
    • (2002) In the Matter ofSupervan, Inc. , pp. 5
  • 27
    • 85183235385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 95-ERA-40, D&O or Remand by ARB, at 5-6, June 21
    • Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services, 95-ERA-40, D&O or Remand by ARB, at 5-6 (June 21, 1996)
    • (1996) Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services
  • 29
    • 85183250454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-SDW-6, Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration by ALJ, May 31
    • Beliveau v Naval Undersea Warfare Center, 97-SDW-6, Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration by ALJ (May 31,2000)
    • (2000) Beliveau v Naval Undersea Warfare Center
  • 30
    • 85183282546 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-SOX-15, Order of ALJ requiring In Camera Inspection, August 1, and Order Compelling Discovery (August 15, 2003)
    • Welch v Cardinal Bankshares Corp., 2003-SOX-15, Order of ALJ requiring In Camera Inspection (August 1, 2003) and Order Compelling Discovery (August 15, 2003).
    • (2003) Welch v Cardinal Bankshares Corp.
  • 31
    • 85183228286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-AIR-27, Order Granting Motion to Compel by ALJ, September 24
    • Diego v United Parcel Service Co., 2003-AIR-27, Order Granting Motion to Compel by ALJ, p. 2 (September 24, 2003).
    • (2003) Diego v United Parcel Service Co. , pp. 2
  • 32
    • 85183269226 scopus 로고
    • 92-ERA-44, D&O of Remand by SOL, at 8, April 14
    • Holden v Gulf States Utilities, 92-ERA-44, D&O of Remand by SOL, at 8 (April 14,1995).
    • (1995) Holden v Gulf States Utilities
  • 33
    • 85183239473 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 98-STA-2, Order of ARB, at 4, January 29
    • Madonia v Dominicki Finer Food, 98-STA-2, Order of ARB, at 4 (January 29,1999)
    • (1999) Madonia v Dominicki Finer Food
  • 34
    • 85183287092 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-ERA-56, Order of ARB, at 4, February 2
    • Foley v Boston Edison Co., 97-ERA-56, Order of ARB, at 4 (February 2,1999)
    • (1999) Foley v Boston Edison Co.
  • 38
    • 85183252124 scopus 로고
    • 88-ERA-27, recommended order by ALJ, at 14-15, March 10
    • Ridings v Commonwealth Edison, 88-ERA-27, recommended order by ALJ, at 14-15 (March 10,1989).
    • (1989) Ridings v Commonwealth Edison
  • 39
    • 85183250376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-ERA-17, D&O of ARB, March 30
    • Cox v Lockheed Martin, 97-ERA-17, D&O of ARB, pp. 5-6 (March 30, 2001)
    • (2001) Cox v Lockheed Martin , pp. 5-6
  • 40
    • 85183233733 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 1998-ERA-37, Order of recusal by ALJ, April 28
    • Grafv Wackenhut Services, 1998-ERA-37, Order of recusal by ALJ (April 28, 2000).
    • (2000) Grafv Wackenhut Services
  • 42
    • 85183286426 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 99-STA-5, D&O of ARB, December 30
    • Johnson v Roadway Express, 99-STA-5, D&O of ARB, p. 8 (December 30, 2003)
    • (2003) Johnson v Roadway Express , pp. 8
  • 43
    • 85183230574 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-CAA-2/9, D&O of ARB, February 29
    • Berkman v U.S. Coast Guard, 97-CAA-2/9, D&O of ARB, p. 15 (February 29, 2000).
    • (2000) Berkman v U.S. Coast Guard , pp. 15
  • 44
    • 85183221237 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 99-ERA-17, D&O of ARB, December 28
    • Hasan v Commonwealth Edison, 99-ERA-17, D&O of ARB, p. 3 (December 28, 2000).
    • (2000) Hasan v Commonwealth Edison , pp. 3
  • 45
    • 85183241712 scopus 로고
    • 89-ERA-19, D&O of SOL, at 22 n. 10, September 17
    • Thomas v APS, 89-ERA-19, D&O of SOL, at 22 n. 10 (September 17,1993).
    • (1993) Thomas v APS
  • 46
    • 85183244867 scopus 로고
    • 85-TSC-2, D&O of SOL, at 14, August 17
    • Crosby v Hughes Aircraft Co., 85-TSC-2, D&O of SOL, at 14 (August 17,1993).
    • (1993) Crosby v Hughes Aircraft Co.
  • 47
    • 85183260744 scopus 로고
    • 87-STA-9, D&O of Deputy SOL, at 3-4, December 2
    • Boyd v Belcher Oil Co., 87-STA-9, D&O of Deputy SOL, at 3-4 (December 2, 1987).
    • (1987) Boyd v Belcher Oil Co.
  • 48
    • 85183230793 scopus 로고
    • 88-ERA-15, Final D&O of SOL, at 4-5, April 7
    • Bartlik v TVA, 88-ERA-15, Final D&O of SOL, at 4-5 (April 7,1993).
    • (1993) Bartlik v TVA
  • 49
    • 85183222642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 96-ERA-6, Order of ARB, at 16, September 24
    • McCafferty v Centerion, 96-ERA-6, Order of ARB, at 16 n. 23 (September 24, 1997).
    • (1997) McCafferty v Centerion , Issue.23
  • 50
    • 85183242578 scopus 로고
    • 86-ERA-33, D&O of SOL, at 3-4, October 24
    • Spencer v Hatfield Elec Co., 86-ERA-33, D&O of SOL, at 3-4 (October 24, 1988)
    • (1988) Spencer v Hatfield Elec Co.
  • 51
  • 52
    • 85183223201 scopus 로고
    • 87-STA-13, D&O of SOL, at 13-14, December 7
    • Perez v Guthmiller Trucking Co., Inc., 87-STA-13, D&O of SOL, at 13-14, 27 (December 7,1988).
    • (1988) Perez v Guthmiller Trucking Co., Inc. , pp. 27
  • 55
    • 85183286937 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2001-AIR-3, D&O of ARB, January 30
    • Peck v Safe Air International, 2001-AIR-3, D&O of ARB, p. 6 (January 30, 2004).
    • (2004) Peck v Safe Air International , pp. 6
  • 56
    • 85183283878 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-SOX-15, Recommended D&O of ALJ, January 28
    • Welch v Cardinal Bankshares Corp., 2003-SOX-15, Recommended D&O of ALJ, p. 36 (January 28, 2004)
    • (2004) Welch v Cardinal Bankshares Corp. , pp. 36
  • 57
    • 85183254315 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-SOX-8, D&O of ALJ, February 2
    • Getman v Southwest Securities, 2003-SOX-8, D&O of ALJ, p. 10 (February 2, 2004).
    • (2004) Getman v Southwest Securities , pp. 10
  • 58
    • 85183284661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • No. 01-10916, 11th Cir
    • Georgia Power Company v DOL, No. 01-10916, p. 15 (11th Cir. 2002)
    • (2002) Georgia Power Company v DOL , pp. 15
  • 59
    • 85183234344 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 96-STA-35, D&O of ARB, June 28
    • Poll v R.J. Trucking, 96-STA-35, pp. 6, D&O of ARB (June 28,2002)
    • (2002) Poll v R.J. Trucking , pp. 6
  • 60
    • 85183213058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-WPC-l, D&O of ARB, July 31
    • Tracanna v Arctic Slope, 97-WPC-l, D&O of ARB, p. 8 (July 31, 2001)
    • (2001) Tracanna v Arctic Slope , pp. 8
  • 61
    • 85183285675 scopus 로고
    • 85-ERA-37, recommended D&O of ALJ, at 18, October 20
    • Hale v Baldwin Assocs., 85-ERA-37, recommended D&O of ALJ, at 18 (October 20,1986).
    • (1986) Hale v Baldwin Assocs.
  • 64
  • 65
    • 85183252569 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 95-ERA-40, D&O of ARB, at 13 (collecting cases)
    • Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services, 95-ERA-40, D&O of ARB, at 13 (collecting cases).
    • Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services
  • 67
    • 85183257965 scopus 로고
    • CLI-93-23, M&O of NRC Commission, 38 NRC 169, October 21
    • In re Five Star Products, Inc., CLI-93-23, M&O of NRC Commission, 38 NRC 169 (October 21,1993).
    • (1993) In re Five Star Products, Inc.
  • 68
    • 85183235502 scopus 로고
    • 83-ERA-5, slip op. of ALJ at 5, adopted by SOL, September 9
    • Landers v Commonwealth-Lord Joint Venture, 83-ERA-5, slip op. of ALJ at 5, adopted by SOL (September 9,1983).
    • (1983) Landers v Commonwealth-Lord Joint Venture
  • 69
    • 85183277716 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2004-SOX-2, D&O of ALJ, January 28
    • Morefield v. Exelon Service, 2004-SOX-2, D&O of ALJ (January 28, 2004).
    • (2004) Morefield v. Exelon Service
  • 70
    • 85183229500 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2001-CAA-3, D&O of ALJ, December 30
    • Knox v U.S. Department of Interior, 2001-CAA-3, D&O of ALJ, p. 3 (December 30, 2002).
    • (2002) Knox v U.S. Department of Interior , pp. 3
  • 71
    • 85183267363 scopus 로고
    • 85-CAA-l, D&O of SOL, at 13, June 1
    • Willy v Coastal Corp., 85-CAA-l, D&O of SOL, at 13 (June 1, 1994)
    • (1994) Willy v Coastal Corp.
  • 72
    • 85183259661 scopus 로고
    • 88-ERA-17, D&O of SOL, at, March 30
    • Mandreger v Detroit Edison Co., 88-ERA-17, D&O of SOL, at 13-14 (March 30, 1994)
    • (1994) Mandreger v Detroit Edison Co. , pp. 13-14
  • 74
    • 85183208963 scopus 로고
    • 87-ERA-35, SOL D&O of Remand, at, July 19
    • Pillow v Bechtel Construction, 87-ERA-35, SOL D&O of Remand, at 11 (July 19, 1993)
    • (1993) Pillow v Bechtel Construction , pp. 11
  • 75
  • 76
    • 85183210299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-ERA-15, D&O of ARB, at, August 27
    • Jarvis v Battelle Pacific Northwest, 97-ERA-15, D&O of ARB, at 8 (August 27, 1998).
    • (1998) Jarvis v Battelle Pacific Northwest , pp. 8
  • 77
    • 85183267030 scopus 로고
    • 89-ERA-7/17, SOL Remand Order, at, June 3
    • Saporito v Florida Power & Light Co., 89-ERA-7/17, SOL Remand Order, at 1 (June 3,1994).
    • (1994) Saporito v Florida Power & Light Co. , vol.1
  • 79
    • 85183230329 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 96-ERA-30, D&O of ARB, January 31
    • Phillips v Stanley Smith Security, 96-ERA-30, D&O of ARB, pp. 17-18 (January 31, 2001)
    • (2001) Phillips v Stanley Smith Security , pp. 17-18
  • 81
    • 85183209510 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-SOX-7, D&O of ALJ, March 4
    • Halloum v. Intel Corp., 2003-SOX-7, D&O of ALJ, p. 10 (March 4, 2004).
    • (2004) Halloum v. Intel Corp. , pp. 10
  • 83
    • 85183235385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 95-ERA-40, D&O of Remand by ARB, June 21
    • Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services, 95-ERA-40, D&O of Remand by ARB, p. 12 (June 21,1996)
    • (1996) Timmons v Mattingly Testing Services , pp. 12
  • 84
    • 85183209342 scopus 로고
    • 85-ERA-34, D&O of SOL, at, September 28
    • Bassett v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 85-ERA-34, D&O of SOL, at 4 (September 28, 1993).
    • (1993) Bassett v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. , pp. 4
  • 87
    • 85183247492 scopus 로고
    • 90-ERA-30, D&O of Remand by SOL, at, August 4
    • Hobby v Georgia Power Co., 90-ERA-30, D&O of Remand by SOL, at 27 (August 4,1995).
    • (1995) Hobby v Georgia Power Co. , pp. 27
  • 89
    • 85183269420 scopus 로고
    • 89-ERA-20, D&O of SOL, at, November 16
    • Samodurov v General Physics Corp., 89-ERA-20, D&O of SOL, at 9-10 (November 16,1993)
    • (1993) Samodurov v General Physics Corp. , pp. 9-10
  • 90
    • 85183259463 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2002 WL 734775, n. 2, 10th Cir
    • Hasan v DOL, 2002 WL 734775, p. 3 n. 2 (10th Cir. 2002).
    • (2002) Hasan v DOL , pp. 3
  • 91
    • 85183234014 scopus 로고
    • 92-STA-37, D&O of remand by SOL, at, January 17
    • Nolan v AC Express, 92-STA-37, D&O of remand by SOL, at 1 (January 17, 1995).
    • (1995) Nolan v AC Express , pp. 1
  • 92
    • 85183278313 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2003-SOX-7, D&O of ALJ, March 4
    • Halloum v Intel Corp., 2003-SOX-7, D&O of ALJ, p. 10 and n. 18 (March 4, 2004).
    • (2004) Halloum v Intel Corp. , Issue.18 , pp. 10
  • 93
    • 85183222820 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 90-ERA-30, R. D&O of ALJ, at, September 17
    • Hobby v Georgia Power Co., 90-ERA-30, R. D&O of ALJ, at 48 (September 17, 1998).
    • (1998) Hobby v Georgia Power Co. , pp. 48
  • 95
    • 85183262215 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 90-ERA-30, D&O on Damages by ARB, February 9
    • Hobby v Georgia Power Company, 90-ERA-30, D&O on Damages by ARB, pp. 12-13 (February 9, 2001)
    • (2001) Hobby v Georgia Power Company , pp. 12-13
  • 97
    • 85183262215 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 90-ERA-30, D&O of ARB on Damages, February 9
    • Hobby v Georgia Power Company, 90-ERA-30, D&O of ARB on Damages, p. 20 (February 9, 2001)
    • (2001) Hobby v Georgia Power Company , pp. 20
  • 98
    • 85183262215 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 90-ERA-30, D&O of ARB on Damages, February 9
    • Hobby v Georgia Power Company, 90-ERA-30, D&O of ARB on Damages, p. 20 (February 9, 2001)
    • (2001) Hobby v Georgia Power Company , pp. 20
  • 99
    • 85183218776 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 97-CAA-2, D&O of Remand by ARB, at, February 29
    • Berkman v U.S. Coast Guard Academy, 97-CAA-2, D&O of Remand by ARB, at 33 (February 29, 2000).
    • (2000) Berkman v U.S. Coast Guard Academy , pp. 33
  • 101
    • 85183237048 scopus 로고
    • 86-ERA-36, recommended supplemental D&O of ALJ, at, May 17
    • Goldstein v EBASCO Constr., Inc, 86-ERA-36, recommended supplemental D&O of ALJ, at 2 (May 17,1988).
    • (1988) Goldstein v EBASCO Constr., Inc , pp. 2
  • 103
    • 85183261941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 98-ERA-19, Order Awarding Attorney Fees by ARB, February 6
    • Gutierrez v Regents of the University of California, 98-ERA-19, Order Awarding Attorney Fees by ARB, p. 3 (February 6, 2004).
    • (2004) Gutierrez v Regents of the University of California , pp. 3
  • 105
    • 85183209045 scopus 로고
    • 90-STA-37, D&O of SOL, at, June 3
    • Clay v Castle Coal, 90-STA-37, D&O of SOL, at 7 (June 3,1994).
    • (1994) Clay v Castle Coal , pp. 7
  • 107
    • 85183280437 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • F.3d 1375, 4th Cir
    • Blackburn v Reich, 79 F.3d 1375 (4th Cir. 1996)
    • (1996) Blackburn v Reich, 79
  • 108
    • 85183279131 scopus 로고
    • 8 F.3d 369, 375, 6th Cir
    • Phelan v Bell, 8 F.3d 369, 375 (6th Cir. 1993).
    • (1993) Phelan v Bell
  • 112
    • 85183261832 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 95-ERA-ll, Supplemental Order of SOL, at, February 26
    • Johnson v Bechtel Construction, 95-ERA-ll, Supplemental Order of SOL, at 2 (February 26,1996).
    • (1996) Johnson v Bechtel Construction , pp. 2
  • 113
    • 85183213603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 92-SWD-2/93-STA-15, D&O of ARB, at, June 13
    • Faust v Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 92-SWD-2/93-STA-15, D&O of ARB, at 3 (June 13, 1996)
    • (1996) Faust v Chemical Leaman Tank Lines , pp. 3
  • 117
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 3 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 3
  • 118
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 3 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 3
  • 119
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 3 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 3
  • 120
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 7 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 7
  • 121
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 7 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 7
  • 122
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 9 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 9
  • 123
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 9 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 9
  • 124
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 31 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 31
  • 125
    • 85183235569 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, July 24
    • Hill v TVA, Case No. 87-ERA-23, RD&O of ALJ, p. 40 (July 24,1991).
    • (1991) Hill v TVA , pp. 40
  • 126
    • 85183271472 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, July 2
    • Mitchell v APS, Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, p. 9 (July 2,1992).
    • (1992) Mitchell v APS , pp. 9
  • 127
    • 85183271472 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, July 2
    • Mitchell v APS, Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, p. 9 (July 2,1992).
    • (1992) Mitchell v APS , pp. 9
  • 128
    • 85183271472 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, July 2
    • Mitchell v APS, Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, p. 9 (July 2,1992).
    • (1992) Mitchell v APS , pp. 9
  • 129
    • 85183271472 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, July 2
    • Mitchell v APS, Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, pp. 9-10 (July 2,1992).
    • (1992) Mitchell v APS , pp. 9-10
  • 130
    • 85183271472 scopus 로고
    • Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, July 2
    • Mitchell v APS, Case No. 91-ERA-9, RD&O of ALJ, pp. 9-10 (July 2,1992).
    • (1992) Mitchell v APS , pp. 9-10
  • 131
    • 85183232408 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • NRC eases rules at Northeast’s Millstone
    • March 11
    • “NRC eases rules at Northeast’s Millstone,” Reuters (March 11,1999).
    • (1999) Reuters
  • 133
    • 85183245620 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 705 F.2d at
    • National Acceptance, 705 F.2d at 929-932
    • National Acceptance , pp. 929-932
  • 137
    • 85183269441 scopus 로고
    • F.2d 578, 5th Cir
    • Hoover v Knight, 678 F.2d 578, 581-82 (5th Cir.1982)
    • (1982) Hoover v Knight, 678 , pp. 581-582


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.